Kingdom of Thailand - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability : Public Financial Management Assessment
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
ECONOMIC CLASSIFICATIONPUBLIC EXPENDITURE
TOTAL PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
INTEREST PAYMENTS
CASH POSITION
BUDGET CREDIBILITY
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
EXPENDITURE POLICY
MEDIUM-TERM PLANNING
DOMESTIC DEBT
TAX REVENUE
CASH BALANCE
INTERNAL CONTROLS
FISCAL DATA
INTERNAL AUDIT
FISCAL INFORMATION
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
FISCAL BALANCE
TAX PAYMENTS
FISCAL ENVELOPE
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
HEALTH SERVICES
BUDGETARY FUNDS
FISCAL REFORM
ALLOCATION
PENSION FUND
AUDITOR GENERAL
BUDGETARY RESOURCES
EXTERNAL BORROWING
ANNUAL REPORTS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE
UNCERTAINTY
MACRO-ECONOMIC FORECASTS
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
REFORM PROCESS
PUBLIC AGENCIES
BUDGETARY APPROPRIATIONS
EXTERNAL ASSISTANCE
BUDGET LAW
ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING
ANNUAL REPORT
BUDGET ESTIMATES
ANNUAL BUDGET
APPROPRIATION
DOMESTIC INVESTMENT
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE
GOVERNMENT GUARANTEES
AUDIT SYSTEM
ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
POVERTY REDUCTION
BUDGET SUBMISSIONS
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
BUDGET DATA
BUDGET PROPOSAL
DEBT SERVICE
PRIVATE SECTOR
AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT REVENUE
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPETENCE
ALLOCATION OF EXPENDITURE
TRANSPARENCY
HEALTH INSURANCE
BUSINESS PLANS
GOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
TAX CHANGES
FISCAL DEFICIT
FISCAL SIDE
REFORM PROGRAM
BUDGETARY IMPACT
DEBT INTEREST
TAX REVENUES
ACCOUNTING
DEBT MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL CRISIS
CASH BUDGET
MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK
MUNICIPALITIES
SOCIAL SECURITY CONTRIBUTIONS
DOMESTIC BORROWING
PUBLIC SERVICES
PUBLIC HEALTH
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
BUDGET PROPOSALS
SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
FISCAL DISCIPLINE
INTERNAL CONTROL
PUBLIC SECTOR
STATE ENTERPRISES
CASH MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL ASSETS
CHART OF ACCOUNTS
TAX COLLECTION
BUDGET DOCUMENTATION
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT BUDGET
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EXTERNAL AUDIT
BUDGET DOCUMENTS
FISCAL STANCE
EXPENDITURES
MUNICIPAL SERVICES
EXTERNAL DEBT
BUDGET DOES
COMPETITIVE PROCESS
BUDGET SURPLUSES
SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM
AUDITOR-GENERAL
AUDITORS
BUDGET YEAR
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
MEDIUM-TERM PROJECTIONS
BUDGETING PROCESS
PERFORMANCE AGREEMENTS
BUDGET SYSTEM
APPROPRIATIONS
BUDGET PREPARATION
REVENUE POLICY
BUDGET PROCESS
PUBLIC INTEREST
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
FINANCIAL REPORTS
PUBLIC SERVICE PROVIDERS
PUBLIC SERVICE
BUDGET CLASSIFICATION
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
GOVERNMENT FINANCE STATISTICS
SOCIAL SECURITY
EXCHANGE RATE
TREASURY BILL
FISCAL RISK
CIVIL SERVICE
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
ECONOMIC GROWTH
BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS
NET BORROWING
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
CIVIL SERVICE PAY
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT REVENUES
PUBLIC DEBT
PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENT
BUDGET FORMULATION
FISCAL YEARS
DOMESTIC REVENUE
GOVERNMENT BUDGET
RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
SERVICE DELIVERY
EXTERNAL LOANS
LEGISLATIVE SCRUTINY
FISCAL POSITION
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
APPROPRIATION PROCESS
BUDGETARY SYSTEM
FINANCIAL MARKETS
PUBLIC FUNDS
CORPORATE INCOME TAXES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
STRATEGIC ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
GOVERNMENT GRANTS
GROWTH RATE
PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING
BUDGET ALLOCATION
BUDGET EXECUTION
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
FISCAL POLICY
FISCAL RISKS
STRATEGIC ALLOCATION
AGGREGATE FISCAL
CENTRAL COORDINATION
CASH BALANCES
BUDGET CYCLE
NATIONAL TAXES
INFLATION
INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEMS
AUDIT FINDINGS
DEFICIT FINANCING
PUBLIC FINANCE
BUDGET EXPENDITURE
CASH FLOW
GOVERNMENT GUARANTEE
AGGREGATE REVENUE
ADMINISTRATIVE CLASSIFICATION
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
ECONOMIC FORECAST
TAX RATES
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS
BUDGET DEFICIT
PUBLIC SECTOR ENTITIES
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
CIVIL SERVANTS
FISCAL PERFORMANCE
DECENTRALIZATION
FOREIGN TRADE
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3193Abstract
The Government of Thailand has been
 undertaking wide ranging public financial management reforms
 since 1999 across the six core dimensions of Public
 Financial Management (PFM) performance identified in the
 performance measurement framework. Key reforms include: (i)
 the deployment of an integrated Government Fiscal Management
 Information System (GFMIS) for budget execution and
 reporting; (ii) implementation of Strategic Performance
 Based Budgeting (SPBB) framework; (iii) implementing the
 International Public Sector Accounting Standards for
 reporting; (iv) conducting financial, procurement,
 performance, and risk based audits; and (v) putting in place
 a system of key performance indicators (KPIs) to foster
 greater service delivery responsiveness by government
 agencies. This Public Expenditure and Financial
 Accountability (PEFA) report aims to assess the status of
 the PFM system in Thailand across the six core dimensions of
 PFM performance using the standard PEFA methodology of 28
 high level indicators, excluding the donor practices indicators.Date
2009-10-01Type
Economic & Sector Work :: Other Public Sector StudyIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/3193http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3193
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Pakistan, Sindh Province - Public
 financial management accountability assessmentWorld Bank (World Bank, 2009-09-18)This report presents the public
 financial management and accountability assessment (PFMAA)
 for Pakistan's Sindh province. The assessment uses the
 public expenditure and financial accountability (PEFA) 2005
 framework, which comprises 31 performance indicators to
 evaluate: (i) the six core public financial management (PFM)
 dimensions (credibility of the budget; transparency and
 comprehensiveness; policy-based budgeting; predictability
 and control in budget execution; accounting, recording, and
 reporting; and external scrutiny), and (ii) the extent to
 which donor practices and the management of donor funds
 affect the PFM systems in the country. This assessment
 report highlights the likely impact of PFM weaknesses on
 budgetary outcomes, aggregate fiscal discipline, the
 strategic allocation of resources, and efficient service delivery.
-
Mongolia Public Financial Management Performance ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-04)This public financial management
 performance report (PFM-PR) is the first assessment of
 Mongolia’s PFM system using the public expenditure and
 financial accountability (PEFA) framework. The report aims
 principally to establish an objective baseline measure of
 current PFM performance, highlighting areas of absolute and
 relative strength and weakness, thereby enabling a
 stock-taking of over a decade of PFM reforms in Mongolia and
 guiding the government in its reform priorities. The
 assessment covers PFM at the budgetary central government
 level. The PEFA is an evidence-based methodology that
 measures the performance of a country’s PFM system at a
 particular point in time using a set of standardized
 indicators. The assessment is done on six dimensions of an
 open and orderly PFM system identified by the framework,
 which are: credibility of the budget; comprehensiveness and
 transparency; policy-based budgeting; predictability and
 control in budget execution; accounting, recording, and
 reporting; and external scrutiny and audit. This PEFA
 assessment will complement the considerable work that has
 already taken place on public expenditure management, which
 includes regular economic updates, public investment
 reviews, procurement reviews, analytic work conducted and
 supported by the World Bank funded technical assistance
 projects, as well as technical assistance mission reports of
 the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
-
Peru - Public financial management
 performance report : based on the performance measurement
 framework (PEFA)World Bank (World Bank, 2012-03-19)The report based on the Public
 Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) methodology
 is to serve Peruvians authorities and officials as a
 baseline and reference for the monitoring of Management of
 Public Finances (GFP) in the country. Also, it feeds and
 updates the dialogue between the government and various
 agencies and bilateral development cooperation in the area
 of GFP, the achievements and shortcomings of reform
 processes that are underway or are proposed in the future.
 The report also helps these agencies to determine country
 eligibility for a new program budget support or, possibly,
 to verify compliance with general conditions or special
 disbursement of GFP linked to a program previously approved.
 In addition, the report fosters discussion on the
 formulation or revision of an integrated program of public
 finance or the development or revision of a support program
 for public finance and institutional coordination between
 different agencies.