Author(s)
World BankKeywords
RISK OF FRAUDINTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS COMMITTEE
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
FINANCIAL REPORTING
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
CAPITAL PROJECTS
BILLS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
EXTERNAL AUDITORS
SOCIAL INSURANCE
ENACTMENT
EXPENDITURES
PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
BUDGETARY PROCESS
DEBT RESTRUCTURING
BOOKKEEPING
MINISTERS
REGULATORY AGENCY
INTERNAL CONTROLS
BANK ACCOUNTS
EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
CITIZENS
AUDITORS
INTERNAL AUDIT
DEBT
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS
LEGISLATURE
AUTHORIZATION
APPROPRIATIONS
BUDGET SYSTEM
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
BUDGET PROCESS
FISCAL TRANSPARENCY
STAFF TRAINING
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
FINANCIAL REPORTS
BUDGET REVENUES
LEASED ASSETS
HUMAN RESOURCE
BUDGETARY FUNDS
CENTRALIZATION
PAYMENT SYSTEMS
INTERNAL SECURITY
BUDGET CLASSIFICATION
CASH FLOWS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS LAW
BUDGETARY RESOURCES
TAX
STATE CONTROL
HIRING PRACTICIES ACCOUNT
INTERNAL AUDITING
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
STATE BUDGET
CAPITAL BUDGETING
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
CIVIL SERVICE
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
EMPLOYMENT
AUDIT REPORTS
BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS
CAPITAL MARKETS
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
CAPACITY BUILDING
ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE
ACCOUNTANTS
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
BUDGETARY SPENDING
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
DEPOSITS
BUDGETARY SYSTEMS
WAGES
BUDGET ESTIMATES
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PROVISIONS
AUTHORITY
FOREIGN INVESTORS
LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT
DEMOCRACY
FISCAL YEAR
GOVERNMENT GUARANTEES
DECREE
COUNCILS
REPORTING SYSTEMS
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
AUDITING
DECISION-MAKERS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
CONTRACTORS
PRIVATE SECTOR
DEFICITS
SEPARATION OF POWERS
BANKING SYSTEM
TREASURY
LEGAL REFORM
LARGE CITIES
COMMERCIAL BANKS
CABINET OF MINISTERS
DECREES
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
FISCAL
PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING
AUDITING PROFESSION
BUDGET EXECUTION
CASH COLLECTIONS
MODERNIZATION
FINANCIAL AUDITS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE
ACCOUNTS
BORROWING
INVENTORY
BUDGETARY INSTITUTIONS
BUDGET LAW & LEGISLATION
INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
AUTOMATION
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
PUBLIC RESOURCES
ACCOUNTING & REPORTING
TAX REVENUES
ACCOUNTING
BUDGET SYSTEMS
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
PROGRAM BUDGETING
TAX ADMINISTRATION
POLITICAL CONSENSUS
INSURANCE
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT
CONSTITUTION
EXECUTIVE POWER
PENALTIES
LEGISLATIVE POWER
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
LAWS
IMPEACHMENT
STATE AGENCIES
PUBLIC SECTOR
CASH MANAGEMENT
STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES
ACCOUNTING RECORDS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15365Abstract
Ukraine has several strengths, such as
 an educated workforce, strong bookkeeping skills, and
 commitment to reforms, and a long-term vision of joining the
 European Union. In order to strengthen existing public
 financial accountability, Ukraine will need to build on its
 strength by undertaking several measures. Experience in many
 other countries shows that several required changes entail
 reaching political consensus, reforming existing
 institutions, or creating new institutions. This suggests
 that a realistic timetable for improvement in public
 financial accountability will have to stretch over several
 years and will depend on strong leadership from the top. The
 most important areas for action are: bringing revenues under
 the scope of independent external auditors; introducing the
 concept of internal audit; strengthening the capacity of the
 Accounting Chamber to conduct financial statement audits;
 strengthening the accountability of state owned enterprises;
 introducing international accounting standards for selected
 enterprises; adopting international best practices for
 licensing of audit professionals; and strengthening the
 disciplinary committee of the Chamber of Auditors to provide
 effective oversight. Other measures needed are to: train
 deparmtnetal staff in implementing program budgeting; fully
 implementing the Budget Code; expediting the implementing of
 the Treasury modernization project; and implementing
 standardized automated accounting and reporting systems.Date
2001-10-15Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/15365http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15365
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mongolia Public Financial Management Performance ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-04)This public financial management
 performance report (PFM-PR) is the first assessment of
 Mongolia’s PFM system using the public expenditure and
 financial accountability (PEFA) framework. The report aims
 principally to establish an objective baseline measure of
 current PFM performance, highlighting areas of absolute and
 relative strength and weakness, thereby enabling a
 stock-taking of over a decade of PFM reforms in Mongolia and
 guiding the government in its reform priorities. The
 assessment covers PFM at the budgetary central government
 level. The PEFA is an evidence-based methodology that
 measures the performance of a country’s PFM system at a
 particular point in time using a set of standardized
 indicators. The assessment is done on six dimensions of an
 open and orderly PFM system identified by the framework,
 which are: credibility of the budget; comprehensiveness and
 transparency; policy-based budgeting; predictability and
 control in budget execution; accounting, recording, and
 reporting; and external scrutiny and audit. This PEFA
 assessment will complement the considerable work that has
 already taken place on public expenditure management, which
 includes regular economic updates, public investment
 reviews, procurement reviews, analytic work conducted and
 supported by the World Bank funded technical assistance
 projects, as well as technical assistance mission reports of
 the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
-
Republic of Tajikistan : Health Sector Fiduciary Capacity Assessment ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-12)The Government of the Republic of
 Tajikistan (GOT), the World Bank, and international and
 bilateral partners agreed on the need for a fiduciary
 assessment for the health sector. The main objective of this
 assessment is to help the GOT take the necessary measures
 for fiduciary capacity building in the health sector with a
 view not only to dealing with the existing fiduciary
 capacity weaknesses in the sector for the management of
 public resources, but also to creating favorable fiduciary
 conditions in the Ministry of Health (MOH) to enable it to
 gradually assume implementation responsibility for
 donor-funded projects. Any fiduciary capacity improvements
 in the health sector will provide the additional comfort to
 the donor community, reassuring them that their funds will
 be used more economically and efficiently.
-
Peru - Public financial management
 performance report : based on the performance measurement
 framework (PEFA)World Bank (World Bank, 2012-03-19)The report based on the Public
 Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) methodology
 is to serve Peruvians authorities and officials as a
 baseline and reference for the monitoring of Management of
 Public Finances (GFP) in the country. Also, it feeds and
 updates the dialogue between the government and various
 agencies and bilateral development cooperation in the area
 of GFP, the achievements and shortcomings of reform
 processes that are underway or are proposed in the future.
 The report also helps these agencies to determine country
 eligibility for a new program budget support or, possibly,
 to verify compliance with general conditions or special
 disbursement of GFP linked to a program previously approved.
 In addition, the report fosters discussion on the
 formulation or revision of an integrated program of public
 finance or the development or revision of a support program
 for public finance and institutional coordination between
 different agencies.