Capital Subsidies Implicit in Concessional Finance : How to Make Them More Transparent and Better Targeted
Keywords
BORROWERDEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
DEVELOPMENT BANKS
DISBURSEMENTS
USER FEES
INTEREST PAYMENTS
CREDIT RISKS
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
RISK PREMIUMS
ACCOUNTABILITY
EXPENDITURES
GRACE PERIOD
INTERNATIONAL BANK
CONSUMERS
POSITIVE EXTERNALITIES
BENEFICIARIES
EXPLICIT SUBSIDY
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
COMMERCIAL BANK
REPAYMENT PERIODS
MUNICIPAL BONDS
DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS
DEBT
COMMERCIAL LOAN
LOAN PRINCIPAL
TRANSPORT
MINISTRIES OF FINANCE
DEVELOPING COUNTRY
LOAN TERMS
CASH FLOWS
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
DISCOUNT RATE
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
LOAN PROCEEDS
LOAN REPAYMENTS
SUBSIDY PAYMENTS
IMPLICIT SUBSIDY
OPPORTUNITY COSTS
IMPLICIT SUBSIDIES
CAPITAL INVESTMENT
MATURITY
MATURITIES
LOAN REPAYMENT
DIRECT PAYMENTS
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
CAPITAL COST
REPAYMENT
FINANCE MINISTRIES
INTEREST RATES ON LOANS
DEVELOPMENT BANK
MDB
COMMERCIAL LENDERS
CAPITALIZATION
INCOME TAX
MULTILATERAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS
TAX-EXEMPT
DISBURSEMENT
BENCHMARKS
FIXED SUBSIDY
CREDITS
EXPENDITURE
LENDER
PUBLIC FUNDS
BANKS
DEBT SERVICE
PUBLIC POLICY
COMMERCIAL TERMS
RISK PROFILE
CAPITAL INVESTMENTS
BOND ISSUANCE
BENCHMARK
REPAYMENT PERIOD
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
COMMERCIAL BANKS
LOAN
FEDERAL TAX
FEDERAL GRANTS
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
OPPORTUNITY COST
GRACE PERIODS
REVOLVING FUNDS
FINANCING SOURCES
NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIES
GOVERNMENT BOND
PRESENT VALUE
PRIVATE SECTOR FINANCING
BORROWING
INTEREST RATES
CASH TRANSFERS
GOVERNMENT BONDS
BOND YIELD
BANKING RELATIONSHIPS
LOAN AGREEMENT
WATER SUPPLY
REVOLVING FUND
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
SUBSIDIARY
VALUE ADDED
TAX EXEMPTION
CROSS SUBSIDY
INVESTMENT PROJECTS
DONOR FUNDS
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY
PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
TRUST FUND
TARGETED SUBSIDY
CASH FLOW
INTEREST RATE
TAX EXEMPT MUNICIPAL BONDS
COMMERCIAL BANKING
AFFORDABILITY
HOUSEHOLDS
PRESENT VALUE OF DEBT
TARGETED SUBSIDIES
MUNICIPALITIES
ACTUAL COST
DOMESTIC CAPITAL
RETURN
COMMERCIAL LENDING
FUTURE RESEARCH
TAX EXEMPT
INSTRUMENT
LEVELS OF ACCESS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12977Abstract
Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs)
 finance a significant share of developing country water
 sector investments in Vietnam. Much of this financing is
 concessional and often on-lent by national governments, at
 similar concessional terms, to water utilities. This
 concessionality carries an implicit subsidy, i.e., the
 difference between MDB financing terms and commercial
 financing terms priced more in line with the underlying
 credit risks. As such concessional financing is most often
 used for capital investment projects, the implicit subsidy
 can be considered a capital subsidy. This working paper asks
 whether there is an opportunity to increase the value of
 concessional financing for water sector investments by
 making implicit capital subsidies more explicit and
 targeting them to a clearly defined public policy objective.
 Specifically, the paper (i) considers the extent to which
 implicit subsidies exist in MDB lending for the water
 sector; (ii) identifies a possible approach to quantify the
 amount of subsidies involved; (iii) outlines an emerging
 framework to make subsidies more explicit as a basis for
 improved targeting; and (iv) discusses operational
 implications. By investigating these issues, the paper
 intends to be a first step for governments and donors to
 evaluate how best to use the implicit capital subsidies
 provided by concessional financing in the water sector. The
 paper also suggests areas of future research.Date
2012-02Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/12977http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12977
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Lessons for the Urban Century : Decentralized Infrastructure Finance in the World BankPeterson, George E.; Huet, Gwénaelle; Clarke Annez, Patricia (Washington, DC : World Bank, 2008)This book takes a look at the past to
 gain insights for the future. Nearly 30 years ago, when the
 world urban population was only about half of the 3 billion
 that it is today, when most Less Developed Countries (LDCs)
 were primarily rural, and before the wave of
 decentralization of the 1980s and 1990s, the World Bank
 developed an instrument with great potential. The key
 characteristics of this instrument, the Urban Infrastructure
 Fund (UIF), are several. It provides finance for an array of
 urban services, not just one sector, such as water and
 sanitation, leaving flexibility for local beneficiaries to
 set their priorities. UIF projects operate in more than one
 city. Perhaps the most important distinctive feature is that
 these projects use local institutions to do the work of
 identifying, appraising and channeling finance to
 subnational entities (municipalities, local utilities, or
 community groups) on behalf of the World Bank. This
 arrangement makes it feasible to reach beyond the major
 capitals or business centers such as Chongqing, Mumbai, or
 Sao Paulo, or even regional capitals, to fund much smaller
 subprojects, suited to the needs and capacities of smaller
 cities and towns, because local agents are tasked with
 identifying and appraising these projects. Delegating these
 functions makes it practicable not only for a large
 International Financial Institution (IFI) such as the World
 Bank but also for national governments to reach small
 municipalities. Providing support to large numbers of
 municipalities with relatively small investment needs is a
 complex task, but it is fundamental to scaling up beyond
 small pilot projects to programs improving urban services countrywide.
-
Access to Finance in Output-Based AidLieberman, Ira; Kumar, Geeta; Mumssen, Yogita (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2017-08-15)Output-Based Aid (OBA) and other
 results-based financing mechanisms are gaining popularity in
 the development context for many reasons, in particular, the
 desire to link scarce public funding with actual results on
 the ground. But withholding disbursements until the delivery
 of 'results' or 'outputs' requires that
 the service providers delivering the results must have
 access to finance (A2F) to pay for the 'inputs' in
 the first place. Such finance is not always available or
 affordable. The purpose of this working paper is to outline
 some of the key issues related to OBA and A2F. The analysis
 focuses on the energy, water, and health sectors. Micro,
 small and medium enterprise (MSME) financing is the main
 topic; however, OBA is ultimately about poor households
 affording access to basic services, and many OBA schemes
 attempt to address A2F for households, so some of these
 innovations are also described. The working paper is
 expected to support a consultative process between experts
 dealing with A2F challenges and experts on OBA. This process
 should help raise awareness of the OBA approach among
 potential financiers, and help consider solutions
 (instruments, partnerships, capacity building) so that OBA
 and other similar results-based financing mechanisms can be
 brought to scale and integrated into broader sector policy,
 where appropriate.
-
Tunisia Agricultural Finance Study : Main Summary ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-05-07)The Tunisia agricultural finance study
 was carried out in response to a request made in December
 2009 by the Tunisian Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) for
 support for a study on the key constraints in agricultural
 finance. Technical and financial support was specifically
 requested for: (i) a comprehensive diagnostic analysis of
 the current mechanisms and problems of financing of the
 agricultural sector in Tunisia, including those by financial
 institutions and from budget resources, foreign direct
 investment, and insurance; (ii) a comparison of the Tunisian
 experience with successful experiences made in other
 comparable countries; and (iii) the formulation of concrete
 proposals. The diagnostic part was also requested to include
 the regulations pertaining to agricultural credit, other
 constraints impeding the development of agricultural
 finance, such as costs, profitability, professional
 organizations, extension services, research etc., and to
 look at the indebtedness of smallholders. It was also
 requested that the recommendations help to: (i) better
 define the objectives to be achieved in terms of financing
 of agriculture; (ii) increase the participation of the
 financial sector in financing agriculture; (iii) help
 identify need for support by different types of farmers;
 (iv) identify new instruments geared at qualitative and
 technological changes; (v) reduce the indebtedness of
 farmers; and (vi) help improve the subsidies for
 agricultural investment. There are two main written outputs
 of the Tunisia agricultural finance study. The experts
 working on the study have compiled a great deal of detailed
 background information diagnosing the current situation,
 describing practices in other countries, and providing
 recommendations on how to improve the situation in Tunisia.
 These details are provided in the accompanying full
 technical report, which should be of interest to
 technicians. The present report the main summary report
 provides a summary of the main findings and recommendations
 for policy makers.