Keywords
EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC SPENDINGECONOMIC CLASSIFICATION
TAX PAYERS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
SECTOR MANAGERS
CONDITIONALITY
ACCOUNTABILITY
GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE
PUBLIC SECTOR CAPACITY BUILDING
FOREIGN LOAN
ALLOCATION OF EXPENDITURES
FISCAL SPACE
GRANT ALLOCATION
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
TAX REVENUE
MACROECONOMIC STABILIZATION
EXPENDITURE ASSIGNMENT
RAPID POPULATION GROWTH
CAPITAL BUDGET
REVENUE SOURCES
CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAM
PRIVATE INVESTMENT
POVERTY PROFILE
REVENUE COLLECTION
SUBNATIONAL
PUBLIC FINANCES
RESOURCE FLOWS
EXPENDITURE NEEDS
BUDGET FRAMEWORK
CAPITAL SPENDING
BASIC SERVICES
REGIONAL GOVERNMENT
HEALTH SERVICES
ALLOCATION
QUALITY OF SERVICES
CENTRALIZING
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
EXPENDITURE ASSIGNMENTS
TAX BASE
TAX POLICY
NATIONAL BUDGET
TRANSACTION
OPTIMAL TAXATION
FISCAL IMBALANCES
ANNUAL TARGETS
PROGRAMS
EXTERNAL ASSISTANCE
CAPACITY BUILDING
EXPENDITURE GROWTH
TOWN
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
COMPOSITION OF PUBLIC SPENDING
EQUITY OF PUBLIC SPENDING
ANNUAL BUDGET
MARKET FAILURES
RECURRENT EXPENDITURE
LOCAL REVENUE
SECTORAL PLANS
APPROPRIATION
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE
CAPITAL STOCK
NATURAL RESOURCES
TAX EFFORT
POVERTY REDUCTION
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
MASTER PLAN
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
PRIVATE SECTOR
COST OF SALARIES
ALLOCATION OF EXPENDITURE
FEDERAL LAWS
HEALTH OUTCOME
VERTICAL FISCAL IMBALANCE
POLICY OBJECTIVES
REGIONAL GOVERNMENTS
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
HEALTH CARE
REVENUE ASSIGNMENTS
GOVERNMENT POLICY
BUDGETARY INSTITUTIONS
NATIONAL BUDGETS
TOTAL SPENDING
DISTRICT
ACCOUNTING
ECONOMIC STABILITY
CIVIL SERVICE REFORM
HUMAN CAPITAL
VILLAGE
OUTCOME INDICATORS
MUNICIPALITIES
DOMESTIC BORROWING
DECENTRALIZATION STRATEGY
PUBLIC SERVICES
GOVERNMENT BUDGETING
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
DISTRICT LEVEL
PUBLIC SECTOR
TAX COLLECTION
ROAD FUND
TARGET SETTING
BUDGET DOCUMENTS
SUB-NATIONAL
BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
EXPENDITURES
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
HEALTH SECTOR
EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
SECTORAL ALLOCATION
SECTOR CEILINGS
ANNUAL PLANS
LEVEL OF POVERTY
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
HEALTH CENTERS
EFFICIENCY LOSSES
BUDGETING PROCESS
BUDGET PREPARATION
EXTERNAL AID
BLOCK GRANTS
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
BUDGET PROCESS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
RUNNING COSTS
PUBLIC SERVICE
EFFICIENT RESOURCE ALLOCATION
SAFETY NET
FISCAL FRAMEWORK
POVERTY LEVEL
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE
CIVIL SERVICE
ECONOMIC GROWTH
DELIVERY OF SERVICES
INVESTING
FEDERAL TREASURY
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURES
POLICY FRAMEWORK
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
TAX BASES
SECTOR MINISTRIES
STRATEGIC PLANS
BUDGET OUTTURN
INCOME TAX
DOMESTIC REVENUE
CAPITAL FORMATION
GOVERNMENT FINANCES
SERVICE DELIVERY
RECURRENT EXPENDITURES
EXPENDITURE LEVEL
LOCAL TAXES
DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
EXPENDITURE
REVENUE CAPACITY
RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION
GROWTH RATE
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
FINANCIAL FLOW
REVENUE ASSIGNMENT
REVENUE BASE
BUDGET ALLOCATION
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
EXPENDITURE DATA
EDUCATION SERVICES
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
REVENUE RAISING CAPACITIES
ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE
FISCAL POLICY
SOCIAL SERVICE
FISCAL TRANSFER
PERFORMANCE REPORTS
ARTICLE
BUDGETARY MANAGEMENT
BUDGET SUPPORT
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
TAX RATE
ACCOUNTABLE GOVERNMENT
BUDGET CYCLE
NATIONAL TAXES
FEDERALISM
BUDGET RESOURCES
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
DISTRICTS
NATIONAL RESOURCES
PUBLIC RESOURCES
GRANT PROGRAMS
MACROECONOMIC STABILITY
DEFICIT FINANCING
PUBLIC FINANCE
CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION
FISCAL PRUDENCE
TAX RATES
FEDERAL MINISTRIES
BUDGET REQUIREMENTS
EXPENDITURE ALLOCATION
FEDERAL CONSTITUTION
DECENTRALIZATION PROGRAM
PUBLIC SPENDING
CIVIL SERVANTS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12339Abstract
The objective of this study is explore
 in depth public finance issues and their impact on
 decentralized service delivery at the regional and woreda
 level in Amhara region. The study is carried out as part of
 the federal and some regional case studies designed to
 examine effectiveness of public finances of sub-national
 governments. This study was expected to (i) review the
 institutional arrangement for managing public finances at
 the regional level including policies, budgetary
 institutions, systems and processes; (ii) assess the level,
 trend, and composition of public spending (both functional
 and economic classification) in per capita terms over the
 past five years and identify key achievements and
 limitations; (iii) assess the level, trend, and, composition
 of revenue at the regional level and examine the financing
 framework, including ways to increase local revenue
 generation capacity; (iv) assess the role of external aid in
 supporting decentralized service delivery and the
 sustainability of the program in absence of external aid;
 (v) review the planning and budgeting process as well as the
 quality of PFM system; and (vi) data permitting, establish
 the link between the level of spending and the outputs and
 outcomes for selected sectors. The study used standard
 public financial process review methodologies used for
 undertaking PEFA assessments. The report reviewed the
 various studies, plans and performance reports of the
 various sectors in the regions between EFY 1997 and 2001. In
 addition, key informant interviews were carried out at
 bureaus levels and woreda offices of education, health,
 water, agriculture and rural development, finance and
 economic development, revenue, General Auditor, rural road
 and woreda administrations.Date
2013-02-13Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/12339http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12339
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Ethiopia : Public Finance Review 2010World Bank (Washington, DC, 2010-08)Ethiopia Public Finance Review (PFR) is an analytical input to the regular Government-Donor dialogue on public finance and aid effectiveness. It forms the basis for policy focused analyses and sustained dialogue that facilitate close partnership and enhanced mutual accountability between Government and the development partners. The PFR is also an important instrument for determining the level and quality of aid and it fulfills a due diligence requirement for operations like the Protection of Basic Services. The 2010 PFR analyzes the effectiveness of decentralized service delivery in Ethiopia. While the Government of Ethiopia (GoE) has pursued decentralization for the last two decades, neither a comprehensive documentation of the functioning of the system nor a thorough evaluation of its effectiveness is available. This study attempts to fill this gap by linking policy and institutional variables related to decentralization with service delivery outcomes at the sub-national level.
-
Agriculture Public Expenditure Review at the Federal and Subnational Levels in Nigeria (2008-12)Mogues, Tewodaj; Olofinbiyi, Tolulope; Olomola, Aderibigbe; Udoh, Edet; Onu, Justice; Woldeyohannes, Sileshi; Nwoko, Chinedum; Alabi, Reuben (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-08-22)Agricultural expenditure is critical to
 the transformation of the agricultural sector in Nigeria.
 Yet spending on agriculture remains at low levels in spite
 of the sector’s huge potential for wealth creation,
 employment generation, and poverty reduction. This report is
 a summary of the findings of the Nigeria agricultural public
 expenditure review (AgPER) at the federal and subnational
 levels. The main objectives of this review are to (1)
 examine the extent to which the size and composition of
 public spending on agriculture is consistent with national
 and subnational agricultural policies and development
 priorities, (2) analyze the efficiency and effectiveness of
 public resources allocated to agriculture, (3) understand
 the cross-tier fiscal and planning relationships between the
 federal government and subnational governments, (4) develop
 a database of public agricultural expenditures at the
 federal and subnational levels, and (5) provide
 recommendations on how to improve the efficiency and
 effectiveness of public agricultural spending to advance
 Nigeria’s Agricultural Transformation Agenda (ATA). In
 addition to the federal-level analysis, the review analyzes
 agricultural public expenditures in three case study states:
 (1) cross river, (2) Niger, and (3) Ondo, and three case
 study local government areas (LGAs): (1) Akamkpa, (2)
 Wushishi, and (3) Odigbo. The analysis at the federal level
 covers the period 2008-12, while the subnational-level
 analysis covers the period 2000-12.
-
Benishangul-Gumuz Regional State : Public Finance ReviewKidane, Chekol; Alemu, Getnet (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2010-05)The objective of this study is to
 explore in depth public finance issues and their impact on
 decentralized service delivery at the regional and woreda
 levels in Benishangul Gumuz (BG) region. The study is
 carried out as part of the federal and some regional case
 studies designed to examine effectiveness of public finances
 of sub-national governments. This study was expected to (i)
 review the institutional arrangement for managing public
 finances at the regional level including policies, budgetary
 institutions, systems and processes; (ii) assess the level,
 trend, and composition of public spending (both functional
 and economic classification) in per capita terms over the
 past five years and identify key achievements and
 limitations; (iii) assess the level, trend, and, composition
 of revenue at the regional level and examine the financing
 framework, including ways to increase local revenue
 generation capacity; (iv) assess the role of external aid in
 supporting decentralized service delivery and the
 sustainability of the program in absence of external aid;
 (v) review the planning and budgeting process as well as the
 quality of PFM system; and (vi) data permitting, establish
 the link between the level of spending and the outputs and
 outcomes for selected sectors. The study used standard
 public financial process review methodologies used for
 undertaking PFM assessments. The report reviewed the various
 studies, plans and performance reports of the various
 sectors in the regions between 1997 and 2001. In addition,
 key informant interviews were carried out at bureaus levels
 and woreda offices of education, health, water, agriculture
 and rural development, finance and economic development,
 revenue, General Auditor, rural road and woreda administrations.