Accountability in Public
 Expenditures in Latin America and the Caribbean :
 Revitalizing Reforms in Financial Management and Procurement
Keywords
CASH RATIONINGPUBLIC EXPENDITURE
ACCOUNTABILITY
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
DOMESTIC FIRMS
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
HARD BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
INTERNAL CONTROLS
REFORM STRATEGY
INTERNAL AUDIT
PUBLIC HOSPITALS
DEBT
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
PUBLIC FINANCES
POLITICIANS
BUDGET FRAMEWORK
PUBLIC SECTOR EFFICIENCY
INTERNAL AUDIT FUNCTION
OIL PRICES
ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS
CASH FLOWS
BUDGETARY RESOURCES
FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS
TAX EVASION
NATIONAL BUDGET
ANNUAL REPORTS
HARD BUDGET CONSTRAINT
PROCUREMENT PROCESS
SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTION
BUDGET COMPREHENSIVENESS
CORRECTIVE ACTION
REVENUE ESTIMATES
CAPITAL MARKETS
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS
ANNUAL REPORTING
PROGRAMS
REVENUE FORECASTING
ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
NATIONAL ACCOUNTING
BUDGET EXECUTION REPORTING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ANNUAL BUDGET
CAPITAL FLIGHT
DEMOCRATIC SOCIETIES
GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
SANITATION
NATURAL RESOURCES
CIVIL SOCIETY PARTICIPATION
BUDGETARY MECHANISMS
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REPORT
COMMODITY PRICES
CREDIT RATINGS
SOCIAL SAFETY NETS
DEBT SERVICE
PRIVATE SECTOR
MULTIYEAR FRAMEWORK
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGERS
TRANSPARENCY
ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES
PERFORMANCE MONITORING
DEBT RELIEF
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
AGENCY MANAGERS
REFORM PROGRAM
NATIONAL BUDGETS
ROAD CONSTRUCTION
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS
ACCOUNTING
PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
FINANCIAL STABILITY
EFFECTIVENESS OF GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS
COUNTRY PROCUREMENT ASSESSMENT
MUNICIPALITIES
PERFORMANCE AUDITING
QUALITY CONTROL
FISCAL TRANSFERS
BUDGET PROPOSALS
INTERNAL CONTROL
PUBLIC SECTOR
OVERSIGHT CAPABILITIES
OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY
CHART OF ACCOUNTS
DEBT CRISES
EXTERNAL AUDIT
DEBT BURDEN
EXTERNAL AUDITORS
EXTERNAL DEBT
MEMBER COUNTRIES
FINANCIAL CRISES
EXTERNAL AUDITS
MINISTRY OF DEFENSE
TOTAL PUBLIC SPENDING
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
REGULATORY SYSTEM
APPROPRIATIONS
BUDGET SYSTEM
REGULATORY AUTHORITY
PUBLIC SECTOR PROCUREMENT SYSTEM
BUDGET PROCESS
PUBLIC INTEREST
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
FINANCIAL REPORTS
NATIONAL ACCOUNTS
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
PUBLIC SERVICE
BUDGET ACCOUNTS
BUDGET CLASSIFICATION
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
GOVERNMENT FINANCE STATISTICS
FISCAL FORECASTS
PUBLIC SECTOR PROCUREMENT
REGULATORY REGIMES
SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTIONS
BUDGET COVERAGE
GOVERNMENT SPENDING
CIVIL SERVICE
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
OVERSIGHT ARRANGEMENTS
DELIVERY OF SERVICES
IMPROVING BUDGET EXECUTION
SOCIAL PROGRAMS
GOVERNMENT REVENUES
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
PROCUREMENT FUNCTION
BUDGET FORMULATION
INFRASTRUCTURE SECTOR
LEGISLATIVE SCRUTINY
ACCOUNTABILITY ARRANGEMENTS
PROCUREMENT POLICY
FINANCIAL MARKETS
PUBLIC FUNDS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
CAPITAL INVESTMENTS
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING
COUNTRY PROCUREMENT
ACCOUNTING SYSTEM
BUDGET EXECUTION
BUDGET PLANNING
FISCAL POLICY
REGULATORY SYSTEMS
COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT
AGGREGATE FISCAL
EFFECTIVENESS OF GOVERNMENT
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
BUDGET CYCLE
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
INFLATION
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
PUBLIC RESOURCES
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
AUDIT FINDINGS
DIAGNOSTIC WORK
BUDGET SYSTEMS
PUBLIC FINANCE
STRATEGIC RESOURCE ALLOCATION
PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
PUBLIC SECTORS
DIAGNOSTIC INSTRUMENTS
FISCAL REPORTING
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET ACTIVITIES
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
EX ANTE CONTROLS
BUDGET TRANSFERS
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
AGGREGATE FISCAL DISCIPLINE
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
PUBLIC SECTOR ENTITIES
STRATEGIC POLICY
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
PUBLIC SPENDING
CIVIL SERVANTS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2647Abstract
Based on a sample of countries in Latin
 America and the Caribbean, this book sets out areas in which
 governments could focus to improve the quality of public
 expenditures. It seeks to identify, from a regional
 perspective, first, the cross-cutting strengths and
 weaknesses of public financial management and procurement
 systems, and second, the characteristics of and lessons that
 can be learned from reform programs. In undertaking this
 analysis, the authors have taken a particular interest in
 establishing what role civil society organizations may have
 played, or could play, in promoting transparency and
 accountability in the public sector. More specifically, this
 book focuses on the specific institutional arrangements and
 the policy choices that underpin the management of public
 finances, which are set out primarily in a sample of
 publicly available Country Financial Accountability
 Assessments and Country Procurement Assessment Reports
 undertaken by the World Bank and its development partners.Date
2012-03-19Type
Publications & Research :: PublicationIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/2647978-0-8213-7984-4
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2647
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mongolia Public Financial Management Performance ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-04)This public financial management
 performance report (PFM-PR) is the first assessment of
 Mongolia’s PFM system using the public expenditure and
 financial accountability (PEFA) framework. The report aims
 principally to establish an objective baseline measure of
 current PFM performance, highlighting areas of absolute and
 relative strength and weakness, thereby enabling a
 stock-taking of over a decade of PFM reforms in Mongolia and
 guiding the government in its reform priorities. The
 assessment covers PFM at the budgetary central government
 level. The PEFA is an evidence-based methodology that
 measures the performance of a country’s PFM system at a
 particular point in time using a set of standardized
 indicators. The assessment is done on six dimensions of an
 open and orderly PFM system identified by the framework,
 which are: credibility of the budget; comprehensiveness and
 transparency; policy-based budgeting; predictability and
 control in budget execution; accounting, recording, and
 reporting; and external scrutiny and audit. This PEFA
 assessment will complement the considerable work that has
 already taken place on public expenditure management, which
 includes regular economic updates, public investment
 reviews, procurement reviews, analytic work conducted and
 supported by the World Bank funded technical assistance
 projects, as well as technical assistance mission reports of
 the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
-
Indonesia - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability : Public Financial Management Performance Report and Performance IndicatorsWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2007-10-31)The Public Expenditure and Financial
 Accountability (PEFA) assessment for Indonesia was
 undertaken by a team of World Bank staff and consultants
 with close involvement of counterparts from the Government
 of Indonesia. The PEFA measurement framework has been
 developed after wide consultations with a group of donors,
 client countries, and international professional
 organizations. It provides an integrated, standardized, and
 indicator-led methodology to measure and monitor Public
 Financial Management (PFM) performance over time. Its
 objective is to help assess the performance of PFM systems,
 processes, and institutions in each country and provides
 broad measures of PFM performance relative to system
 characteristics. The scoring methodology, covering a set of
 thirty one high level indicators, emphasizes empirical and
 observable scores for each PFM area based on internationally
 recognized good practice. The framework was not designed to
 rank countries by means of an overall aggregate score for
 each country. The PFM performance report which supports the
 scores and brings together an analytical summary is not
 meant to judge policy actions of government nor provide
 explicit recommendations, but instead to support a
 strengthened approach to PFM reforms by facilitating
 dialogue between government and other stakeholders on PFM reforms.
-
Serbia Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Performance ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-06-29)A Public Expenditure and Financial
 accountability (PEFA) repeat assessment was conducted in the
 Republic of Serbia (RoS) between November 2014 and May 2015
 by an independent team of experts, led by the World Bank
 (WB). The assessment was financed jointly by the
 Strengthening of Accountability and the Fiduciary
 Environment (SAFE) Trust Fund of the Swiss State Secretariat
 for Economic Affairs (SECO), the European Union Delegation
 to Serbia (EU Delegation) and WB. The period covered by this
 Assessment (2011-2013) was dominated by the challenges posed
 by the aftermath of the global economic recession which
 affected macro-fiscal performances. Notwithstanding these
 challenges PFM improvements can be observed in strengthening
 legislative framework, and Budget classification, multi-year
 fiscal planning, procurement and external audit. In other
 areas such as the composition of expenditure out-turn
 compared with originally approved budget, expenditures
 arrears, oversight of fiscal risk, and effectiveness of tax
 collection, predictability in the availability of funds,
 application of public sector accounting standards
 application and legislative scrutiny of annual budget law
 and final accounts, further work is needed to improve PFM performance.