Albania Local Finance Policy Note : Programmatic Public Expenditure and Institutional Review
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
SALARIESVALUABLE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
UTILITIES
PAYMENT OF DEBT
GOVERNMENT FUNDING
BENEFICIARY
PERSONAL INCOME
GRANT ALLOCATION
TAX REVENUE
DEBT STOCK
INTERNATIONAL MARKETS
URBAN PLANNING
LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING
DEBT
GENERAL PUBLIC
REVENUE COLLECTION
SOCIAL PROTECTION
CALCULATION
VALUATION
DELINQUENT CUSTOMERS
LONG TERM DEBT
POVERTY RATES
NATIONAL INVESTMENT
INTERNATIONAL BORROWING
TRANSPORT
URBAN MIGRATION
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
VALUATIONS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUES
STRUCTURE OF GOVERNMENT
LAND MANAGEMENT
TAX
LOW INCOME
SMALL BUSINESS
LARGE COMPANIES
LOCAL SPENDING
SHAREHOLDERS
CAPITAL INVESTMENT
PUBLIC
CAPITAL MARKETS
RATES OF RETURN
MUNICIPAL REVENUE
PRIVATE FINANCIAL SECTOR
PENSION
WAGE
ARREARS
OPERATING REVENUE
BUSINESS TAX REVENUE
HOUSING
PROVISIONS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
CAPITAL ALLOCATION
BUDGETING
TARIFF REVENUE
GOVERNMENT GUARANTEES
CONTRIBUTIONS
SMALL BUSINESSES
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
INVESTMENT FUNDS
GRANT DISTRIBUTION
TAX ASSIGNMENT
OWNERSHIP DATA
INVESTMENT DECISIONS
GOVERNMENT SUPPORT
CASH PAYMENTS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BORROWING
DEBT SERVICE
EQUALIZATION
URBAN SERVICES
FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION
ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT GUARANTEES
LEGISLATION
TRANSPARENCY
GRACE PERIODS
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
SOCIAL ASSISTANCE
HEALTH INSURANCE
MIGRATION
ISSUANCE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE
GRANT ALLOCATIONS
URBAN POPULATION
SENIOR
TURNOVER
INTEREST RATES
CONTRIBUTION
AGGREGATE DEBT
TAX REVENUES
SEWERAGE SERVICES
INSURANCE
SUPERVISORY BOARD
MUNICIPALITIES
PUBLIC SERVICES
LAWS
PROPERTY TAX
CITIES
PUBLIC SECTOR
VARIABLE INTEREST RATES
PUBLIC WORKS
BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
EXPENDITURES
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES
SECURITIES
BENEFICIARIES
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
PRIVATE CAPITAL
CAPITAL GRANTS
GOVERNMENT INVESTMENTS
EXPENDITURE RESPONSIBILITIES
DEBT LIMITATIONS
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
SECONDARY EDUCATION
PUBLIC BORROWING
PROPERTY TAXES
CURRENT RATE
BLOCK GRANTS
PRIVATE BANKS
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
STAKEHOLDERS
GARBAGE COLLECTION
SOCIAL SECURITY
BUSINESS LICENSES
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
LICENSES
TAX SHARING
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
TAX COLLECTIONS
RECURRENT COSTS
TAXATION
CAPITAL MARKET
WAGES
INCOME TAX
GOVERNMENT BUDGET
GOVERNMENT BORROWING
GOVERNMENT DEBT
SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE
COMMUNITY SERVICES
RECURRENT EXPENDITURES
INFORMATION SYSTEM
LOCAL TAXES
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
STREETS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RAPID GROWTH
LOCAL AUTONOMY
DEFICITS
CAPITAL INVESTMENTS
TREASURY
LARGE CITIES
LIABILITY
LOAN
REVENUE ASSIGNMENT
SHORT TERM DEBT
DEPRECIATION
INVESTMENT FINANCING
WORTH
TAX RATE
OUTREACH PROGRAM
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
WATER SUPPLY
ROADS
PUBLIC RESOURCES
GRANT PROGRAMS
LOCAL FINANCE
LEVEL OF EDUCATION
SOCIAL SERVICES
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY
RECURRENT COST
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIES
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
MUNICIPAL
PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATION
LOCAL BUSINESS
PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
PUBLIC SPENDING
SALES
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS
REAL ESTATE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DECENTRALIZATION
PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18920Abstract
Albania has undertaken major reforms in
 its system of local government finance since 2000. What had
 been a system in which local functions were ambiguous and
 financing was largely provided through tightly controlled
 earmarked grants is now one in which functions are
 relatively clear and local governments have more autonomy
 over the allocation of funds. A new system of competitive
 grants for infrastructure investment has been introduced.
 Parliament has enacted a new law on local borrowing. Within
 this framework, however, several controversies remain which
 are addressed in this policy note. In the long term Albania
 must also grapple with certain organizational issues. One is
 the role of regional governments, which now lack any major
 clearly defined function. While the Government's
 decentralization strategy proposes a range of possible
 functions for regional governments, most of these roles
 could be carried out through other means. The other
 organizational issue is the consolidation of small communes.
 The Government's decentralization strategy proposes the
 eventual consolidation of small local governments into
 larger units. International experience, however, suggests
 that the efficiency gains of consolidation are limited and
 may not be sufficient to justify the political costs of
 doing so. Efforts to consolidate local governments should
 consider alternative solutions such as inter-municipal
 agreements and joint service companies before proceeding.Date
2008-09-02Type
Economic & Sector WorkIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/18920http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18920
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia : Issues in Urban and Municipal DevelopmentWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-08-01)The present study examines the
 challenges facing municipal governments in FYR Macedonia.
 The introductory chapter provides some further context for
 these developments, in terms of the challenges they pose
 for urban areas and their governments. Chapter Two examines
 issues for financial management of municipalities under the
 decentralized regime, and the attendant need for improving
 local government capacity. The third chapter highlights
 questions in the area of communal services, where municipal
 governments retain overall provision and supervisory
 responsibilities of the local public enterprises. The fourth
 chapter focuses on urban planning and land management, an
 area critical to the efficient functioning of cities and for
 which municipalities have acquired new obligations. The
 approach of the report is to assemble existing data from
 many available studies, both by the World Bank and by other
 sources, and information obtained from interviews in the
 country to articulate ideas and recommendations for
 consideration by the Government elected in July 2006, by
 municipal governments, and by other stakeholders.
-
Tunisia Urban Development and Local Governance Program : Technical Assessment ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-09-09)In this context, the reform of the LG capital grants and municipal investment planning framework forms the main strategic actions undertaken by the government towards the implementation of its decentralization agenda recently anchored in the new Constitution adopted in January 2014. This grant system, which had operated under an ex ante system of controls, is being restructured through the revision of the Decree 97-1135 governing the LG capital grant system. Through the restructuring, the government intends to improve the efficiency of the state financial support to municipal investment, make the allocation of capital grants more transparent and predictable, strengthen the decision-making power of LGs on the use of their investment funding, and progressively introduce a performance based dimension to their capital grant system. Along with revision of the above decree, the government has also issued a Ministerial Decree to introduce participatory municipal investment planning and budgeting systems, hence promoting citizen engagement in identifying investment needs and priorities. Under the same reform, the government will progressively introduce an independent, annual assessment to measure the performance of LGs in line with the above amended decree. The performance assessment system, in addition to serving as a tool for monitoring LG s performance, has proven to be a very effective means of incentivizing LGs to strengthen their institutional performance, where access to grant funds is linked to results. The areas covered under the performance assessment will include governance, sustainability and management. The results of this performance assessment will be used to adjust the capital grant allocation starting the third year of the program.
-
City Finances of Ulaanbaatar, MongoliaLkhagvadorj, Ariunaa; Brhane, Meskerem; Garzón, Hernando (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-02-03)Ulaanbaatar's (UB) population has
 swollen from half a million in 2001 to approximately 1.2
 million in 2011, accounting for over 40 percent of the
 country's population. This trend is likely to continue
 as economic growth is increasingly concentrated in UB. With
 its growing population and concerns in rising inequality,
 the city is facing increasing pressure to maintain and
 expand service provision (especially infrastructure). The
 local tax on wages is expected to continue to provide
 substantial revenues to the UB government, which will assist
 the growing demand for services. Additionally, a new
 'capital city tax' is expected to come into effect
 in 2013. The decision of the central government (CG) to
 pursue further decentralization gives greater leadership to
 the UB government and its districts. It also provides local
 broader decision-making authority as well as opportunity for
 citizen's participation and for the improvement of
 governance and transparency. Therefore, a key challenge for
 UB and its districts is ensuring that the local fiscal
 system is sound and ready to handle a greater volume of
 revenues to achieve sustainable and inclusive growth. The
 city also needs to develop a robust and transparent fiscal
 management system if it is to make an effective use of new
 revenue sources. The main objective of this study is to
 understand the inner workings of the municipal finance
 system in Ulaanbaatar and its districts.