Keywords
CONCESSION CONTRACTCAPITAL COSTS
PUBLIC PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE
COSTS OF DELAYS
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
URBAN WATER SUPPLY
SANITATION UTILITIES
ROAD NETWORK
PRODUCTIVITY
PROVISION OF WATER
POWER SHORTAGES
EXORBITANT TARIFFS
ACCESS TO SAFE WATER
SPEEDS
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
POPULATION CENTERS
SUPPLY COSTS
URBAN ROAD
REVENUE COLLECTION
WATER CONSUMPTION
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
RAIL SECTOR
TRANSPORT
LOCOMOTIVE
ALLOCATING WATER RIGHTS
ACCESS TO ELECTRICITY
INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING
RAIL OPERATOR
TRAFFIC LEVELS
RAIL TRANSIT
FINANCIAL DATA
WATER SERVICES
INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES
TRADE FLOWS
RAIL OPERATORS
SERVICE EXPANSION
JOURNEY
ABUSE OF MONOPOLY POWER
RAILWAYS
BALANCE
ROAD SECTOR
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE
COST RECOVERY
AIR TRANSPORT
ROAD TRAFFIC
TARIFF REGULATION
COST OF ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION
SANITATION
NATURAL RESOURCES
ROAD
RURAL ELECTRIFICATION
BOTTLENECKS
RAIL TRANSPORTATION
INVESTMENT DECISIONS
CABLE
ECONOMIC COSTS
TRAVEL TIME
ARTERIES
ELECTRICITY SUPPLY
TRAFFIC DENSITY
ELECTRICITY TARIFFS
RAIL
TRANSPARENCY
AVAILABILITY
FINANCIAL BURDEN
AIRWAYS
POWER PRODUCTION
TRANSPORTATION
ACCESSIBILITY
COST OF SERVICE
TRANSPORT MARKETS
CONSUMPTION OF ELECTRICITY
DISTRIBUTION LOSSES
WELLS
URBAN TRANSPORT
SURFACE WATER
INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS
SUBSIDIARY
GROWTH RATES
AIR TRAFFIC
STORAGE CAPACITY
URBAN WATER
POWER CONSUMPTION
COST SAVINGS
CAPITALS
MARGINAL COSTS
GENERATION CAPACITY
PRIVATE PARTICIPATION
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
PUBLIC SECTOR
MONOPOLY PROFITS
APPROACH
OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY
INTERCONNECTION SERVICES
PRIVATIZATION PROCESS
ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION
COST OF ELECTRICITY
ROUTES
BANDWIDTH
WATER TARIFFS
MARGINAL COST
NATIONAL UTILITY
INVESTMENT TARGETS
ROAD NETWORKS
WEALTH
AIR TRANSPORT SECTOR
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY
CAPITAL BUDGETS
POWER INVESTMENTS
POWER TRADE
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
O&M
TRANSIT
FINANCIAL VIABILITY
GENERATION
COUNTRY COMPARISONS
PRIVATIZATION
TRANSPORT INDUSTRY
AIR
KILOWATT-HOUR
RAIL SYSTEM
HYDROPOWER GENERATION
RAIL TRANSPORT
OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE
COSTS OF POWER
WATER SECTOR
URBANIZATION
BRIDGE
WATER STORAGE
ELECTRIFICATION
WATER SCARCITY
UTILITY BILL
INFRASTRUCTURE SPENDING
UTILITY SERVICES
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL
GENERATION OF ELECTRICITY
HYDROPOWER
SERVICE PROVISION
TRANSPORT QUALITY
WATER QUALITY
TRAFFIC FLOWS
SANITATION SOLUTIONS
WATER UTILITIES
ROAD TRANSPORT
DEFICITS
UTILITY BILLS
RAIL FREIGHT
DISTRIBUTION NETWORK
TRAFFIC
PERFORMANCE DATA
WATER SOURCE
RAIL NETWORK
ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
PORTS
WATER SUPPLY
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
ROADS
UTILITY REVENUES
WATER RESOURCES
POWER
WATER RESOURCE
CONCESSION
TRAFFIC PLANNING
AMOUNT OF POWER
RAILWAY
TRANSPORT POLICY
CASH FLOW
HOUSEHOLDS
JOINT VENTURE
POWER SECTOR
HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION
BORDER CROSSINGS
ENERGY RESOURCES
AIRCRAFT
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
QUALITY OF SERVICE
TRANSPORT SECTOR
ROUTE
DOMESTIC AIR TRANSPORT
POPULATION WITHOUT ACCESS
VEHICLES
BRIDGE BORDER CROSSING
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27758Abstract
Infrastructure improvements contributed
 0.6 percentage points to the annual per capita growth of
 Zambia's gross domestic product (GDP) over the past
 decade, mostly because of the exponential growth of
 information and communication technology (ICT) services.
 Poor performance of the power sector reduced the per capita
 growth rate by 0.1 percentage point. Simulations suggest
 that if Zambia's infrastructure platform could be
 improved to the level of the African leader, Mauritius, per
 capita growth rates could increase by two percentage points
 per year. Zambia's high generation capacity and
 relatively high power consumption are accompanied by fewer
 power outages than its neighbors. But Zambia's power
 sector is primarily oriented toward the mining industry,
 while household electrification, at 20 percent, is about
 half that in other resource-rich countries. Zambia's
 power tariffs are among the lowest in Africa and are less
 than half the level needed to accelerate electrification and
 keep pace with mining sector demands. Meeting future power
 demands and raising electrification rates will be difficult
 without increasing power tariffs. Zambia's
 infrastructure situation is more hopeful than that of many
 other African countries. Infrastructure spending needs,
 though large, are not beyond the realm of possibility, and
 Zambia's resource wealth and relatively well-off
 population provide a more solid financing basis than is
 available to many other countries. Zambia's
 infrastructure funding gap, though substantial, can be
 dramatically reduced through measures to stem inefficiencies
 and lower costs.Date
2017-08-14Type
ReportIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/27758http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27758
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Zambia’s Infrastructure : A Continental PerspectiveDominguez, Carolina; Foster, Vivien (2011-03-01)Infrastructure improvements contributed
 0.6 percentage points to Zambia's annual per capital
 GDP growth over the past decade, mostly because of
 exponential growth in information and communication
 services. The power sector, by contrast, pulled the growth
 rate down by more than 0.1 percentage points. Improving
 Zambia's infrastructure endowment could boost growth by
 up to 2 percentage points per year. Zambia's relatively
 high generation capacity and power consumption are
 accompanied by fewer power outages than elsewhere in the
 region. But Zambia's power sector emphasizes the mining
 industry, while household electrification is about half that
 in other resource-rich countries. Zambia's power
 tariffs, among the lowest in Africa, are less than half the
 level needed to accelerate electrification and keep pace
 with mining sector demands. In power as in just about every
 other aspect of infrastructure, rural Zambians lag well
 behind their African peers. In a country where 70 percent of
 the population depends on agriculture for its livelihood,
 this represents a huge drag on the economy. Zambia would
 need to spend an average of $1.6 billion a year over the
 decade 2006-15 to develop the infrastructure found in the
 rest of the developing world. This is equivalent to 20
 percent of Zambia's GDP and about double the
 country's rate of investment in recent years. Closing
 the country's annual infrastructure funding gap of $500
 million requires raising more funds, looking for more
 cost-effective ways to meet infrastructure targets, and
 eliminating the inefficiencies that cause the loss of $300
 million annually.
-
Ghana's InfrastructureWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2017-08-14)Infrastructure contributed just over one
 percentage point to Ghana's improved per capita growth
 performance during the 2000s, though unreliable power
 supplies held growth back by 0.5 percentage points. Raising
 the country's infrastructure endowment to that of the
 region's middle-income countries could boost annual
 growth by more than 2.7 percentage points. Today, Ghana has
 a very advanced infrastructure platform when compared with
 other low-income countries in Africa. But as the country
 approaches the middle-income threshold, it will need to
 focus on upgrading its infrastructure indicators in line
 with this benchmark. The Africa Infrastructure Country
 Diagnostic (AICD) has gathered and analyzed extensive data
 on infrastructure in more than 40 Sub-Saharan countries,
 including Ghana. The results have been presented in reports
 covering different areas of infrastructure, including ICT,
 irrigation, power, transport, water, and sanitation, and
 different policy areas, including investment needs, fiscal
 costs, and sector performance. This report presents the key
 AICD findings for Ghana and allows the country's
 infrastructure situation to be benchmarked against its
 African peers. Given that Ghana is a relatively well-off
 low-income country well on its way to reaching middle-income
 status, two sets of African benchmarks will be used to
 evaluate Ghana's situation. Detailed comparisons will
 also be made with immediate regional neighbors in the
 Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). As on
 the rest of the continent, West Africa's growth
 performance improved markedly in the 2000s. The overall
 improvement in per capita growth rates has been estimated at
 around 2 percent, of which 1.1 percent is attributable to
 better structural policies and 0.9 percent to improved
 infrastructure. During the five years from 2003 to 2007,
 Ghana's economy grew at an average annual rate of 5.6
 percent, which accelerated to 7.3 percent in 2009.
 Ghana's infrastructure improvements added just over one
 percentage point to the per capita growth rate for the
 period 2003 to 2007.
-
Ghana’s Infrastructure : A Continental PerspectiveFoster, Vivien; Pushak, Nataliya (2011-03-01)Infrastructure contributed just over one percentage point to Ghana's annual per capital GDP growth during the 2000s. Raising the country s infrastructure endowment to that of the region's middle-income countries could boost the annual growth rate by more than 2.7 percentage points. Ghana has an advanced infrastructure platform when compared with other low-income countries in Africa. The country s coverage levels for rural water, electricity, and GSM signals are impressive. A large share of the road network is in good or fair condition. Institutional reforms have been adopted in the ICT, ports, roads, and water supply sectors. Ghana s most pressing challenges lie in the power sector, where outmoded transmission and distribution assets, rapid demand growth, and periodic hydrological shocks leave the country reliant on high-cost oil-based generation. Exceptionally high losses in water distribution leave little to reach end customers, who are thus exposed to intermittent supplies. Addressing Ghana's infrastructure challenges will require raising annual expenditures to $2.3 billion. The country already spends about $1.2 billion per year on infrastructure, equivalent to about 7.5 percent of GDP. A further $1.1 billion is lost each year to inefficiencies, notably underpricing of power.Ghana's annual infrastructure funding gap is about $0.4 billion per year, chiefly related to power and water. Following its recent oil discoveries, Ghana can raise additional public funding from increased tax receipts. The country has several strong areas on which to build and a solid economic base from which to fund incremental efforts.