Author(s)
World BankKeywords
ECONOMIC CLASSIFICATIONPUBLIC EXPENDITURE
INTEREST PAYMENTS
CONDITIONALITY
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS
BUDGET CREDIBILITY
PERSONAL INCOME
PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
CENTRAL BANK
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
TAX LAW
EXPENDITURE POLICY
DOMESTIC DEBT
TAX REVENUE
BUDGET CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
INTERNAL CONTROLS
REFORM STRATEGY
EXPENDITURE PROGRAMS
FISCAL DATA
INTERNAL AUDIT
FISCAL INFORMATION
DEBT
CAPITAL BUDGET
REVENUE SOURCES
BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION
FISCAL BALANCE
SOCIAL PROTECTION
TAX PAYMENTS
PUBLIC FINANCES
LOCAL CURRENCY
BUDGETARY EXPENDITURE
REGIONAL GOVERNMENT
OIL PRICES
AGGREGATE BUDGET
PREPARATION OF BUDGET SUBMISSIONS
INVESTMENT EXPENDITURE
TAX BASE
OIL RESOURCES
TAX EVASION
NATIONAL BUDGET
ANNUAL REPORTS
UNCERTAINTY
OIL PRODUCTS
BUDGET REQUEST
CAPITAL INVESTMENT
REFORM PROCESS
PROGRAMS
REVENUE FORECASTING
BUDGET LAW
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ANNUAL BUDGET
RECURRENT EXPENDITURE
TRANSFER TAXES
APPROPRIATION
ANNUAL BUDGETS
INVESTMENT BUDGETING
ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
BUDGET SUBMISSIONS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REPORT
BUDGET SURPLUS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
BUDGET DATA
BUDGET PROPOSAL
AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE
FISCAL AGGREGATES
TRANSPARENCY
GOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS
BUDGET BILL
FISCAL DEFICIT
PUBLIC GOODS
GOVERNMENT POLICY
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
REFORM PROGRAM
BUDGETARY IMPACT
ACCOUNTING
DONOR FINANCING
REALLOCATIONS
FINANCE MINISTRY
SALES TAX
CIVIL SERVICE REFORM
TAX ADMINISTRATION
DEBT SUSTAINABILITY
MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK
PUBLIC SERVICES
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
BUDGET PROPOSALS
SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
FISCAL DISCIPLINE
PUBLIC SECTOR
SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS
OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY
FINANCIAL ASSETS
CHART OF ACCOUNTS
TAX COLLECTION
BUDGET DOCUMENTATION
STRUCTURAL REFORMS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT BUDGET
FORWARD ESTIMATES
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EXTERNAL AUDIT
PUBLIC WORKS
DATA COLLECTION
BUDGET PREPARATION PROCESS
EXPENDITURES
EXTERNAL DEBT
BUDGET CIRCULAR
PERSONAL INCOME TAX
BUDGET SURPLUSES
BUDGET YEAR
BUDGETING PROCESS
DONOR ASSISTANCE
BUDGET PREPARATION
REVENUE POLICY
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
PUBLIC SERVICE PROVIDERS
NATIONAL ACCOUNTS
PUBLIC SERVICE
CORPORATE INCOME TAX
BUDGET CLASSIFICATION
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
FISCAL FORECASTS
EXCHANGE RATE
COST ESTIMATES
INVESTMENT BUDGET
STATE BUDGET
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE
FISCAL RISK
GOVERNMENT SPENDING
CIVIL SERVICE
HEALTH CLINICS
MULTILATERAL AGENCIES
ECONOMIC GROWTH
BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS
TAXPAYERS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT REVENUES
EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
PUBLIC DEBT
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
TAX COLLECTIONS
TAX ARRANGEMENTS
BUDGET FORMULATION
STRATEGIC PLANS
SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS
BUDGET OUTTURN
INCOME TAX
DOMESTIC REVENUE
GOVERNMENT BUDGET
SERVICE DELIVERY
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
FISCAL PERSPECTIVE
LEGISLATIVE SCRUTINY
RECURRENT EXPENDITURES
FISCAL POSITION
CAPITAL INVESTMENTS
STRATEGIC ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
COMMERCIAL BANKS
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
ACCOUNTING SYSTEM
BUDGET EXECUTION
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
FISCAL POLICY
FISCAL RISKS
STRATEGIC ALLOCATION
DONOR FUNDING
AGGREGATE FISCAL
DEBT SERVICING
CASH BALANCES
BUDGETARY OUTCOMES
BUDGET SUPPORT
BUDGET CYCLE
PUBLIC CORPORATIONS
BUDGET SUBMISSION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
INFLATION
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
PUBLIC RESOURCES
DEFICIT FINANCING
PUBLIC FINANCE
BUDGET PERIOD
CASH FLOW
BUDGET HOLDERS
AGGREGATE REVENUE
REAL ESTATE TAX
FISCAL REPORTING
BUDGET TRANSFERS
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS
BUDGET DEFICIT
PUBLIC SECTOR ENTITIES
FOREIGN CURRENCY
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
PUBLIC SPENDING
CIVIL SERVANTS
FISCAL PERFORMANCE
DECENTRALIZATION
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/28210Abstract
The public expenditure and institutional
 assessment (PEIA) were motivated by a number of factors.
 First, both the Government of Iraq (GoI) and its
 international development partners have recognized the
 critical importance of sound management of Iraq's
 substantial public financial resources. Both parties support
 the reform and modernization of public financial management
 (PFM), as articulated in the International Compact for Iraq
 (ICI). Secondly, international experience demonstrates the
 importance of establishing a baseline against which progress
 in PFM over time can be measured. This implies the need for
 an assessment which provides the information necessary to
 measure the performance of a country's PFM system.
 Thirdly, the devastating circumstances in Iraq during the
 past 5 years have made the institutional arrangements for
 PFM the subject of considerable uncertainty. The PEIA can
 help to shape and prioritize the necessary development
 program. The report is organized in two main parts. Volume
 one contains a summary of the main issues to emerge from the
 public expenditure and financial accountability (PEFA)
 assessment and a discussion of a number of specific PFM
 issues of current importance to Iraq, including: capital
 investment budgeting (CIB), oil revenue management, the Iraq
 financial management information system (IFMIS), public
 accounting and accountability, and payroll management.
 Volume two contains a detailed technical analysis behind the
 PEFA assessment.Date
2017-09-07Type
ReportIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/28210http://hdl.handle.net/10986/28210
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Iraq Public Expenditure and Institutional Assessment, Volume 1World Bank (Washington, DC, 2008-06)The public expenditure and institutional
 assessment (PEIA) were motivated by a number of factors.
 First, both the Government of Iraq (GoI) and its
 international development partners have recognized the
 critical importance of sound management of Iraq's
 substantial public financial resources. Both parties support
 the reform and modernization of public financial management
 (PFM), as articulated in the International Compact for Iraq
 (ICI). Secondly, international experience demonstrates the
 importance of establishing a baseline against which progress
 in PFM over time can be measured. This implies the need for
 an assessment which provides the information necessary to
 measure the performance of a country's PFM system.
 Thirdly, the devastating circumstances in Iraq during the
 past 5 years have made the institutional arrangements for
 PFM the subject of considerable uncertainty. The PEIA can
 help to shape and prioritize the necessary development
 program. The report is organized in two main parts. Volume
 one contains a summary of the main issues to emerge from the
 public expenditure and financial accountability (PEFA)
 assessment and a discussion of a number of specific PFM
 issues of current importance to Iraq, including: capital
 investment budgeting (CIB), oil revenue management, the Iraq
 financial management information system (IFMIS), public
 accounting and accountability, and payroll management.
 Volume two contains a detailed technical analysis behind the
 PEFA assessment.
-
Mongolia Public Financial Management Performance ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-04)This public financial management
 performance report (PFM-PR) is the first assessment of
 Mongolia’s PFM system using the public expenditure and
 financial accountability (PEFA) framework. The report aims
 principally to establish an objective baseline measure of
 current PFM performance, highlighting areas of absolute and
 relative strength and weakness, thereby enabling a
 stock-taking of over a decade of PFM reforms in Mongolia and
 guiding the government in its reform priorities. The
 assessment covers PFM at the budgetary central government
 level. The PEFA is an evidence-based methodology that
 measures the performance of a country’s PFM system at a
 particular point in time using a set of standardized
 indicators. The assessment is done on six dimensions of an
 open and orderly PFM system identified by the framework,
 which are: credibility of the budget; comprehensiveness and
 transparency; policy-based budgeting; predictability and
 control in budget execution; accounting, recording, and
 reporting; and external scrutiny and audit. This PEFA
 assessment will complement the considerable work that has
 already taken place on public expenditure management, which
 includes regular economic updates, public investment
 reviews, procurement reviews, analytic work conducted and
 supported by the World Bank funded technical assistance
 projects, as well as technical assistance mission reports of
 the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
-
Indonesia - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability : Public Financial Management Performance Report and Performance IndicatorsWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2007-10-31)The Public Expenditure and Financial
 Accountability (PEFA) assessment for Indonesia was
 undertaken by a team of World Bank staff and consultants
 with close involvement of counterparts from the Government
 of Indonesia. The PEFA measurement framework has been
 developed after wide consultations with a group of donors,
 client countries, and international professional
 organizations. It provides an integrated, standardized, and
 indicator-led methodology to measure and monitor Public
 Financial Management (PFM) performance over time. Its
 objective is to help assess the performance of PFM systems,
 processes, and institutions in each country and provides
 broad measures of PFM performance relative to system
 characteristics. The scoring methodology, covering a set of
 thirty one high level indicators, emphasizes empirical and
 observable scores for each PFM area based on internationally
 recognized good practice. The framework was not designed to
 rank countries by means of an overall aggregate score for
 each country. The PFM performance report which supports the
 scores and brings together an analytical summary is not
 meant to judge policy actions of government nor provide
 explicit recommendations, but instead to support a
 strengthened approach to PFM reforms by facilitating
 dialogue between government and other stakeholders on PFM reforms.