The Relationship Between Theoretical Orientation and Countertransference Expectations: Implications for Ethical Dilemmas and Risk Management.

Abstract

Countertransference awareness is widely considered valuable for differential diagnosis and the proactive management of ethical dilemmas. We predicted that the more practitioners’ theoretical orientation (TO) emphasizes insight into the dynamics of subjective mental life, the better they will be at using their countertransference (CT) expectations in differential diagnosis with high risk patients. To test this hypothesis, we compared Psychodynamic Therapy practitioners (PDT) who emphasize insight into subjective mental life with practitioners who do not emphasize this epistemology. Results indicated that PDT expected significantly more CT than practitioners of CBT and Other practitioners (e.g., Family Systems, Humanistic/Existential, and Eclectic) to patients with Borderline Personality Organization (BPO) overall. PDT practitioners had a significantly more CT expectations to patients with Borderline-level pathologies as compared to Neurotic level patients and than
 both CBT and Other practitioners. PDT practitioners were significantly more expectant of CT issues than CBT practitioners with respect to the personality disorders most associated with acting out and risk-management problems (e.g., Paranoid, Psychopathic, Narcissistic,
 Sadistic, Sadomasochistic, Masochistic, Hypomanic, Passive-Aggressive, Counterdependent, and Counterphobic). The Other practitioners generally had CT expectations between PDT
 and CBT. These findings suggest that clinical training into CT may be useful in differential diagnoses and in helping to avoid ethical dilemmas regardless of one’s theoretical preference.