Calculative practices in higher education: a retrospective analysis of curricular accounting about learning
Author(s)
Dixon, K.Keywords
higher educationcredit accumulation and transfer
social and institutional accounting
genealogical methods
Field of Research::15 - Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services::1501 - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability
Field of Research::13 - Education::1302 - Curriculum and Pedagogy::130203 - Economics, Business and Management Curriculum and Pedagogy
Field of Research::13 - Education::1303 - Specialist Studies in Education::130313 - Teacher Education and Professional Development of Educators
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10092/4402http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18295/1/MPRA_paper_18295.pdf
Abstract
MPRA Paper No. 18295, uploaded 2 Nov 2009Purpose – Accounting has been shown to figure variously in New Higher Education.
 However, despite their infant precursors having been labelled curricular accounting
 (Theodossin, 1986), accounting researchers have overlooked a collection of calculative
 practices that has grown and spread internationally over the past two decades. The collection in question comprises credit points, levels of learning, level descriptors, learning outcomes, and related characteristics of student transcripts and diploma supplements, qualification frameworks and credit transfer systems. This paper extends coverage of the accounting
 literature to this particular variant of accounting.
 Design/Methodology/Approach – The subject is addressed both in a technical way and in
 the broader context of accounting in organisations and society. The former University of New Zealand and its affiliate in Christchurch, New Zealand, and the University of Canterbury, also of that city, are used as a case study. The credit point system in place at the University of
 Canterbury in 2009 and its antecedents back to 1873 are analysed genealogically. Participantobservation and related means are used to collect data. These data are analysed using ideas of representational schemes, path-dependent changes and negotiated orders among parties who
 have been associated with the case institutions.
 Findings – The analysis illuminates how and why learning (and teaching) at the University of Canterbury has come to be specified, recorded and controlled using curricular accounting; and why the accounting in use accords conceptually and, to an increasing degree, in practice
 to that in use across tertiary education in many countries. Among the social, economic and political issues that have spurred on this spread are international standards, quality and equivalence of tertiary education qualifications, study and learning; diversification of
 participation in tertiary education; changes to the levels and sources of funding tertiary
 education; and the many and varied ideas, etc. associated with New Higher Education. The spread has multifarious consequences for students, academics, alumni, universities and
 similar institutions, higher education, governments and others. There is much scope for further research.
 Research limitations/ implications – The findings are derived from an accounting
 perspective and there is scope for adding other perspectives.
 Practical Implications – A synopsis of curricular accounting and several of its facets are synthesised in this one paper, along with its history and with issues that are likely to with its history and with issues that are likely to
 condition further developments.
 
 condition further developments.
 Originality Value – Curricular accounting is now in the accounting
Date
2010-08-31Type
Discussion / Working PapersIdentifier
oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/4402Dixon, K. (2009) Calculative practices in higher education: a retrospective analysis of curricular accounting about learning..
http://hdl.handle.net/10092/4402