Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRinaldi, Leonardo
dc.contributor.authorUnerman, J.
dc.contributor.authorde Villiers, Charl
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T15:18:57Z
dc.date.available2019-09-23T15:18:57Z
dc.date.created2018-09-13 23:34
dc.date.issued2018-06-18
dc.identifieroai:eprints.lancs.ac.uk:127040
dc.identifierhttp://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/127040/1/Final_accepted_version_of_Evaluating_the_Integrated_Reporting_journey.PDF
dc.identifierRinaldi, Leonardo and Unerman, J. and de Villiers, Charl (2018) Evaluating the integrated reporting journey : insights, gaps and agendas for future research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 31 (5). pp. 1294-1318. ISSN 0951-3574
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/95142
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify key challenges, opportunities, strengths and weaknesses experienced by the integrated reporting (IR) idea since the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC)’s Discussion Paper was published in late 2011. It provides insights into the phases of the IR journey as investigated by accounting researchers, identifies important gaps in the literature and sketches an agenda for future research. Design/methodology/approach: The paper develops a theoretically informed analysis of published IR research articles using the idea journey theoretical framework. The paper draws upon academic analysis and insights published in 65 IR-related articles across 83 accounting journals listed in the Scopus database. Findings: A key insight of the paper is that the academic literature has not yet covered all stages of the IR idea journey. The highest proportion of articles provide insights in the generation and production phases of this journey, while there is relatively little research into the impact phase of the IR idea. Furthermore, the locus of research covered by the current IR literature is situated at macro- and meso-levels. This reveals opportunities for future research to explore, at a more detailed level, interactions between single individuals or small groups in implementing or understanding the IR idea. Research limitations/implications: This paper focuses on the idea journey of the IIRC’s version of IR. It identifies gaps regarding the stages of the IR idea journey that have not been covered by the extant academic literature and suggests some research areas that need to be addressed to help inform improvements in policy and practice. A key limitation is that it draws on a single communication channel, namely, academic articles published in accounting journals, but it provides opportunities for considerable further developments. Originality/value: The paper extends IR research by reconciling insights from an understandably fragmented emerging literature. It provides a multi-dimensional perspective on IR, highlighting the dynamics and interrelationships in the literature. It also helps inform improvements in research, policy and practice by identifying gaps regarding the stages of the IR idea journey that have not been covered by the extant academic literature. Lastly, the paper builds on the work of innovation and creativity scholars showing how the idea journey framework can be used to shape and add coherence to accounting research. © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited.
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/127040/
dc.titleEvaluating the integrated reporting journey : insights, gaps and agendas for future research
dc.typeJournal Article
ge.collectioncodeBO
ge.dataimportlabelOAI metadata object
ge.identifier.legacyglobethics:15251956
ge.identifier.permalinkhttps://www.globethics.net/gel/15251956
ge.lastmodificationdate2018-09-13 23:34
ge.lastmodificationuseradmin@pointsoftware.ch (import)
ge.submissions0
ge.oai.exportid149952
ge.oai.repositoryid2295
ge.oai.setnameStatus = Published
ge.oai.setnameType = Journal Article
ge.oai.setspec7374617475733D707562
ge.oai.setspec74797065733D61727469636C65
ge.oai.streamid2
ge.setnameGlobeEthicsLib
ge.setspecglobeethicslib
ge.linkhttp://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/127040/1/Final_accepted_version_of_Evaluating_the_Integrated_Reporting_journey.PDF


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record