Keywords
FAIR TRIALADJUDICATION
LEADERSHIP
LEGAL STATUS
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
DUE PROCESS OF LAW
ACCOUNTABILITY
COURT RULES
SCANDALS
POLICE
MINISTERS
COURT SETTLEMENTS
CRIME
ANTI-CORRUPTION
JUSTICE
INTEGRITY
JUDICIAL TRAINING
COURT ADMINISTRATION
CRIMINAL
POLITICIANS
DUE PROCESS
CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM
LEGAL SYSTEMS
QUALITY OF JUSTICE
PROSECUTION
ABUSES
GUARDIANSHIP
COURT PERFORMANCE
STATE COURTS
SOCIAL CHANGES
EU
WILL
CRIMINAL PROCEDURES
LEGAL ASSISTANCE
CRIMINAL JUSTICE
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
EUROPEAN COURTS
BEST PRACTICES
COMMERCIAL LAW
FAMILIES
JUDICIAL REVIEW
RULE OF LAW
PROSECUTORS
CIVIL COURTS
CASE MANAGEMENT
INEQUALITY
HUMAN RIGHTS
JUDICIAL SYSTEM
LEGALITY
LITIGATION
SUPREME COURTS
MINISTRIES OF JUSTICE
PROFESSIONALS
CORRUPT
JURISDICTION
JURISPRUDENCE
SERVICE DELIVERY
CIVIL PROCEDURE
RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES
COURT SYSTEMS
DEMOCRACY
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE
RULING PARTY
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
JUDICIAL REFORM
MONOPOLY
PUBLIC FUNDS
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
BANKS
SUBSTANTIVE LAWS
CRIME VICTIMIZATION
TRIAL
LEGAL REFORM
COMMON LAW
JUDICIAL STATISTICS
EQUALITY
BANKRUPTCY
TRANSPARENCY
CONFIDENCE
LAWYER
CORRUPTION PERCEPTION
COURTS
CORRUPTION
PUBLIC DEFENDERS
JUDICIARY
ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS
MEDIATION
COURT
ARBITRATION
LEGAL PROFESSION
BREACH OF CONTRACT
JUDICIAL OFFICERS
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
COMPLAINTS
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
EMPOWERMENT
CRIMINAL CASES
JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS
ECONOMIC BENEFITS
PUBLIC PROSECUTORS
ATTORNEYS
JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE
LOBBYING
COURT DELAYS
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
JUDICIAL SERVICES
CIVIL LAW
BAR ASSOCIATIONS
LAWS
VIOLENCE
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
JUDGE
LEGAL AID
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27451Abstract
This paper presents a selection of
 experiences from Organization for Economic Cooperation and
 Development (OECD) countries in managing justice
 institutions which are the most relevant for performance
 improvement of their counterparts in Latin America. The
 scope of the paper is mostly limited to the courts, but
 comprises all types of courts: specialized courts as well as
 courts of general jurisdiction, civil as well as criminal
 and administrative courts, first instance as well as
 appellate and supreme courts. Issues of legal reform,
 judicial training, alternative dispute resolution or access
 for the poor are not considered in this paper. The first
 chapter provides an overview of the justice sector reform
 experience in Latin America over the last two decades, and
 how these reforms coincide with or follow OECD country
 trends. The second chapter outlines the context of the
 debates regarding the performance and quality of justice
 services in OECD countries prior to the 1990s. The third
 chapter discusses the transition from traditional justice
 reform approaches in OECD countries to the New Public
 Management (NPM) approaches that began in the 1990s. The
 fourth chapter presents five major cases of reforms in
 public expenditure, human resources, and organizational
 restructuring in the justice sectors of five different
 countries. The fifth chapter describes recent trends in OECD
 countries regarding quality controls in court service
 delivery which share approaches with the private sector. The
 paper concludes with some suggestions about areas where
 Latin American judiciaries may benefit from experiences of
 OECD countries.Date
2011Type
Working PaperIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/27451http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27451
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Bulgaria Judicial Performance, Caseload and Expenditure Review (2008-2014)World Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-12-08)The World Bank published a Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (PEIR) of the Bulgarian justice sector entitled “Resourcing the Judiciary for Performance and Accountability: A Judicial Public Expenditure and Institutional Review” in 2008. The objective of the present study is to conduct an assessment of the spending and institutional changes in Bulgaria’s judiciary from 2008 onwards. The current report examines the principal trends in resourcing Bulgaria’s judiciary since 2008, while comparing the expenditure and judicial performance with those of other European countries. The report provides a set of conclusion and recommendations for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of Bulgaria’s judiciary and the judicial budget process.
-
Bulgaria - Resourcing the Judiciary for Performance and Accountability : A Judicial Public Expenditure and Institutional ReviewWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2008-06)This report examines why, given the increasing resources allocated to the judiciary, there seem to have been only modest improvements in judicial performance. It lifts the veil on the conflicting opinions on the reasons for slow progress on performance and efficiency by analyzing the institutional environment within which the judiciary functions and the key incentives propelling the policy stances and actions of major institutional actors. A supply-demand approach is then used to review the challenges behind improving judicial performance, focusing on resource allocation and management issues on the supply side and on case inflow on the demand side. This perspective enables consideration of both supply and demand issues impacting judicial performance and offers an opportunity to suggest actions and policy responses that could enable policy makers to manage demand more effectively while strengthening access to justice. Overall, therefore, improving judicial performance now requires a shift from increasing the overall level of resources to approaches that do not increase the burden on the central budget. The key challenge now confronting Bulgaria's judiciary is to build on the reforms so far by developing, financing and implementing a judiciary-wide modernization program to sustain the transformation and demonstrate impact through monitor able indicators of performance. The information and analysis in this report much of it familiar to the leadership of Bulgaria's judiciary, executive and legislature could facilitate a consensus between the three branches of power on the resources that the judiciary could realistically expect to receive, and on the results that it can be expected to achieve, given existing resource and capacity constraints. In this dialogue, an exclusive focus on judicial independence could risk diverting attention from concrete measures needed to ensure that the judiciary is adequately resourced and that mechanisms to ensure the efficient use of resources and improved performance are in place. Indeed, judicial independence is a fundamental principle guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of Bulgaria, and unconditionally respected with regard to the judiciary's adjudicative functions. However, sustained focus on the achievement of performance goals could have important potential long-term benefits for the judicial system, not only in terms of increased budgetary resources, but more importantly in terms of increased public trust and confidence.
-
In Search of Success : Case Studies in Justice Sector Development in Sub-Saharan AfricaWalsh, Barry (World Bank, 2012-03-19)The World Bank, Department for International Development (DFID) and other donors have long been engaged in legal and judicial reform in sub-Saharan Africa in such areas as legal drafting, strengthening court administration, judicial training, and the empowerment of citizens through a better understanding of the legal system. This has often been done on an ad hoc basis with only limited review of other reform efforts in the region. In order to foster a more responsive approach to justice sector development programs, a collection of case studies was commissioned. One of the more daunting tasks was identifying notable justice sector developments or reforms, which offered specific impacts and which could be examined through both a desk review and field research. Independent of the funding source, the evidence base was not only limited but revealed a need for donors themselves to invest in better data collection, which could then be analyzed and measured against benchmarks or objectives such as improved access to justice. There is a significant need to review and learn from experiences, including controversial ones, in Africa's justice sectors. These case studies are not homogenous largely because their subjects vary and span a wide array of developments that reflect the realities of the region. Each story stands alone and is in no particular order. In the final chapter, the conclusions offered in each story are digested into ideas for future actions. The collection also represents a modest range of stories and it is to be hoped that other cases will be identified and shared. A comparison of experiences of sector-wide programs (SWAPs), for example, could help both donors and governments enhance socio-economic impact. It should be noted that the emphasis in this report is on providing information about positive directions in justice sector development and the ways in which lessons learned might be applied to achieve greater impact in the future. The anticipated value of this collection is that some of the conclusions or actions may be taken up and used to contribute to improvements by those committed to improving the rule of law in sub-Saharan Africa and is in search of 'success'.