Beyond Intermediation: A New (FinTech) Model for Securities Holdings Infrastructures
Author(s)
Mooney, Charles W., Jr.Keywords
intermediated securitiessecurities settlement
intermediary risk
disintermediation
transparency
financial infrastructure
securities lending
rehypothecation
customer protection
securities regulation
central securities depositories
Depository Trust Company
SEC
Banking and Finance Law
Corporate Finance
Finance
Law
Law and Economics
Science and Technology Law
Securities Law
Technology and Innovation
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/2098https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3100&context=faculty_scholarship
Abstract
Publicly traded securities generally are held by investors in securities accounts with intermediaries such as stockbrokers and central securities depositories—intermediated securities. For many investors this is the only practical means of holding and dealing with securities. These intermediated holding systems (IHSs) impose a variety of risks and costs. Investors are exposed to intermediary risk (default or insolvency of an intermediary holding securities) as well as impediments to the exercise of rights such as voting and asserting claims against securities issuers. The nontransparency of IHSs imposes other social costs, such as obstacles to anti-money laundering enforcement. The emergence of FinTech and the potentially disruptive effects of distributed ledger technology (blockchain) now present realistic opportunities for reforms of securities holding infrastructures that would increase transparency and allow investors to hold securities directly on the books of their issuers. This article proposes a “New Platform System” (NPS) for the direct holding of securities that would connect issuers and investors and also connect both with trading and settlement systems (which would remain intact, at least for now). Unlike other recent transparency and direct holding proposals, the NPS would cover both equity and debt securities and would flexibly accommodate beneficial aspects of current IHSs, such as margin lending, securities lending, and rehypothecation. The article presents a broader menu of problems that the NPS could resolve. The NPS addresses the probable objections that the intermediaries who benefit from the status quo would make to any transparency or direct holding proposals. Disintermediation likely would require regulatory intervention by the SEC in the United States. By offering reforms that would minimize the disruption of current market practices, the NPS could encourage intervention and blunt opposition. It also could provide a “primordial soup” for future, more extensive reforms of trading and settlement systems.Date
2019-08-15Type
textIdentifier
oai:scholarship.law.upenn.edu:faculty_scholarship-3100https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/2098
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3100&context=faculty_scholarship
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Supply Chain Security GuideKruk, Cornelis; Donner, Michel (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2017-09-06)A supply chain is a system of resources,
 organizations, people, technologies, activities and
 information involved in the act of transporting goods from
 producer to consumer and user. This (SCS) guide is intended
 for trade and transport government officials, port
 authorities and transport, cargo and logistics communities,
 in particular in developing countries. The purpose of the
 guide is to make concerned trade and transport-related
 officials, managers and personnel in developing countries
 acquainted with, and aware of, the many initiatives
 mushrooming in the field of supply chain security, what
 these will mean for their respective organizations, and how
 to tackle the inlaid challenges. This chapter attempts to
 clarify the background and current status of the multitude
 of programs that exist across the world today. This is
 achieved by, firstly, giving a brief account of the changing
 security environment (post 9/11) and its resulting
 implications for SCS programs. This is important as it helps
 to explain the motivation of the programs which are later
 expanded upon in more detail within the chapter. Within this
 section, the motivations for different types of programs,
 not directly linked to the events of 9/11 but to other
 reasons, such as combating illegal activities, enhancement
 of efficiency and standardization are also explained.
 Secondly, a list of the main programs is present under four
 main subheadings: compulsory programs, major voluntary
 programs, regional or national programs, and others. Tables
 are presented at the end of the section summarizing the main
 points of each program. Finally, some of the issues
 surrounding the programs are presented in the concluding section.
-
Republic of Indonesia Financial Sector Assessment ProgramInternational Monetary Fund; World Bank (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2017-08-10)This assessment forms part of the joint
 International Monetary Fund (IMF) World Bank Indonesia
 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) which is being
 undertaken during 2009-2010. The assessment, which covers
 the private sector equity and corporate bonds securities
 system's observance of the Committee on Payment and
 Settlement Systems / International Organization of
 Securities Commissions (CPSS/IOSCO) recommendations for
 securities settlement systems, was conducted during an ad
 hoc mission. The assessment focuses on two types of trades.
 First the clearing and settlement process is assessed as
 regards equity transactions traded on the stock exchange
 Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX), cleared through the
 Clearing and Guarantee Corporation (KPEI) clearing system
 (e-CLEARS) and settled through the Central Securities
 Depository for the Stock Exchange securities (KSEI)
 settlement system (C-BEST). In addition, the assessment
 focuses on corporate bond transactions, which are traded
 outside the exchange and settled through the KSEI settlement
 system (C-BEST).
-
Mexico : The IOSCO Objectives and Principles of SecuritiesInternational Monetary Fund; World Bank (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-01-30)As the supervisor of the securities
 markets in Mexico, the National Banking and Securities
 Commission (Comision Nacional Bancaria y de Valores, CNBV)
 has developed a robust supervisory framework that exhibits
 high levels of implementation of the International
 Organization of Securities Commissions Objectives and
 Principles of Securities Regulation (IOSCO Principles) in
 many areas. The assessment was conducted during the
 International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank Financial
 Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) mission to Mexico during
 the period September 7 to September 21, 2011. The assessment
 was carried out using the 2003 IOSCO methodology for
 assessing implementation of the IOSCO Principles. The most
 significant issues regarding full implementation of the
 Principles fall under the regulator principles. These issues
 flow from two sources. First, there is no specific statute
 governing derivatives (whether exchange traded or
 over-the-counter (OTC)), nor any other express legislative
 provisions that govern the regulation of that growing
 market. Second, there are significant weaknesses in the
 protections afforded members of the Board of Governors and
 staff and with the resources of the commission that lead to
 concerns about its independence and ability to carry out its
 mandate fully. This report gives summary of discussions on
 CNBV acceptance to allow the informal assessment of the
 status of implementation of the newly added Principles,
 using the guidance provided in the draft revised assessment
 methodology as issued in May 2011.