Author(s)
Leat, DianaKeywords
Accounting Auditing and Accountability not elsewhere classified (150199)Business and Management not elsewhere classified (150399)
social justice
philanthropy
foundations
change
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://eprints.qut.edu.au/27618/Abstract
Focusing primarily on Anglophone countries, this article begins by looking at the changing environment of foundations, the pressures on foundations and some responses to those pressures. It then focuses on the potential of a structural change approach - often known as 'social change' or 'social justice' grant-making - as a solution to some of the modern dilemmas of foundations, and considers why this approach has, with some exceptions, gained relatively little support. This raises the wider issues of why and how resource-independent, endowed foundations change when conventional explanations of organisational change do not easily apply. Researching a 'lack' is clearly difficult; this article adopts an analytic perspective, examining the characteristics of the structural change approach as a mimetic model, and draws on the work of Rogers (2003) on the characteristics required for the successful diffusion of innovations. It suggests that the structural change approach suffers from some fundamental weaknesses as a mimetic model, failing to meet some key characteristics for the diffusion of innovations. In conclusion, the article looks at conditions under which these weaknesses may be overcome.Date
2009Type
journal articleIdentifier
oai:arrow.nla.gov.au:125432199316671http://eprints.qut.edu.au/27618/