Author(s)
WorlKeywords
LOCAL AUTHORITIESDECISION MAKING
CITIZEN INPUT
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY GROUPS
PUBLIC RESOURCES
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC SERVICES
PUBLIC SERVICE
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
LOCAL GOVERNANCE
EXPENDITURE
GOOD GOVERNANCE
EQUALITY
CITIZEN
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
INCOME
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
LABOR MARKET
TRUST FUNDS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS
SOCIAL CHANGE
FORMAL INSTITUTIONS
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
APL
CDD
ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS
BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS
HOUSEHOLDS
CORRUPTION
TRANSPORT
IMPROVING GOVERNANCE
COMMUNES
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
WAGES
DECISION-MAKING
POLITICAL CRISIS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS
ETHNIC MINORITIES
VILLAGES
LEGITIMACY
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
CITIZENS
SERVICE DELIVERY
ACCOUNTABILITY
GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS
GOVERNANCE INSTITUTIONS
COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT
WATER SUPPLY
LOCAL INSTITUTIONS
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
ECONOMIC REFORM
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
SOCIAL NORMS
GOVERNANCE EDUCATION
GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES
RURAL AREAS
CONSENSUS
FINANCIAL CRISIS
CIVIL SOCIETY
DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES
RURAL COMMUNITIES
COLLECTIVE ACTION
MUNICIPALITIES
MIS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
LOCAL AUTHORITY
GOVERNMENT PROGRAM
VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT
INSTITUTIONAL INCENTIVES
PUBLIC GOODS
TRANSPARENCY
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
ETHNIC GROUPS
DECENTRALIZATION
REHABILITATION
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE
GOVERNMENT SERVICES
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
YOUTH
AUDITS
PARTICIPATORY PROCESSES
LEGAL AUTHORITY
HUMAN RESOURCE
ACTUAL COSTS
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
REPRESENTATIVES
DECENTRALIZATION REFORMS
INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS
SOCIAL COHESION
BLOCK GRANTS
ANTI-CORRUPTION
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS
AUTHORITY
SAVINGS
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
CORRUPT OFFICIALS
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
PUBLIC SECTOR
URBAN AREAS
SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT
GENDER
NATIONAL POLICY
ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY
DEMOCRACY
COMMUNITY MEMBERS
DEMOCRATIC PROCESS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT CAPACITY
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
PUBLIC SECTOR GOVERNANCE
GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS
PARTICIPATORY PLANNING
GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY
HEALTH SERVICES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12697Abstract
Local development activities have profound impact on poor people's welfare. Communities and local governments interact closest to where people live and where essential public services are delivered, such as local transport, water supply, health and education. Vibrant local development requires productive, balanced interaction between empowered communities and capable and accountable local governments. For this interface to function best, well-organized, well-informed communities demand development results, holding local authorities to account and, through participation in decisions and oversight of public service delivery, ensure that those authorities remain effective and open to citizen input. In tandem, local governments supply the capacity to deliver services, reliable resources and a desire to meet local citizens' needs. As a vision for local development, the supply of and demand for effective and responsive government are well-matched. In section one, this report lays out the scope of CDD operations in East Asia and presents three frameworks for organizing them: according to local government context, sectoral scope, and primary development objectives. Organizing six results hypotheses according to a generic CDD results template; section two presents available evidence from East Asia's CDD experience. And section three summarizes lessons learned from this flagship effort.Date
2013-03-13Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/12697http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12697
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Decentralization and Local Democracy
 in the World : First Global Report by United Cities and
 Local Governments 2008World Bank; United Cities and Local Government (Washington, DC: United Cities and Local Government and the World Bank, 2009)This overall picture of decentralization
 and local democracy in African countries shows significant
 progress at the strictly institutional level. No country now
 publicly opposes the implementation of decentralization
 policies. Local governments exist in all countries, and
 elections are held to elect local authorities. The extent of
 such progress must, however, be set against a number of
 persistent obstacles that continue to hinder a real
 progression of decentralization in Africa. Difficulties
 remain within states concerning the transfer of financial
 resources needed to match the devolved responsibilities.
 Local governments also face difficulties in increasing their
 own resources (aside from state-transfers and grants) at a
 faster pace. Ensuring the availability of qualified human
 resources at the local level and improving public access to
 local services are also fundamental issues of concern.
-
Decentralization and Local Democracy in the World : First Global Report by United Cities and Local Governments 2008United Cities and Local Government; World Bank (Washington, DC: United Cities and Local Government and the World Bank, 2012-03-19)This overall picture of decentralization and local democracy in African countries shows significant progress at the strictly institutional level. No country now publicly opposes the implementation of decentralization policies. Local governments exist in all countries, and elections are held to elect local authorities. The extent of such progress must, however, be set against a number of persistent obstacles that continue to hinder a real progression of decentralization in Africa. Difficulties remain within states concerning the transfer of financial resources needed to match the devolved responsibilities. Local governments also face difficulties in increasing their own resources (aside from state-transfers and grants) at a faster pace. Ensuring the availability of qualified human resources at the local level and improving public access to local services are also fundamental issues of concern.
-
Participation, Decentralization and Human RightsFriis-Hansen, Esbern; Kyed, Helene Maria (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2017-09-11)This report examines the theoretical and
 practical synergies between three intervention models that
 are currently being employed to improve local governance in
 developing countries: 1) democratic decentralization or
 devolution; 2) community participatory approaches, and; 3)
 rights-based approaches. The aim is to identify the
 possibilities and challenges of an 'integrative
 approach' to local governance that combines the
 strengths of each of the three intervention models. It is
 assumed that an integrative approach can help enhance
 efforts to improve the downward accountability of local
 governments, enhance equity in the distribution of services
 and in various citizens' access to influence, and
 increase citizen participation in local governance
 processes. This is supported by a number of empirical cases
 from Africa, Latin America, Asia and Bosnia-Herzegovina,
 which are presented in the report. Each case also highlights
 a number of context-specific challenges to using an
 integrative approach, such as available financial resources,
 national policy environments and local conflicts. The report
 fills this gap by both identifying theoretical synergies and
 by drawing on the few empirical cases that exist.