Good Governance in Public-Private Partnerships : A Resource Guide for Practitioners
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
CREDIT RISKPUBLIC FINANCE
PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEES
FINANCIAL DISTRESS
PUBLIC SECTOR
TRANSACTION
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW
SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE
PUBLIC MONEY
PUBLIC POLICY
SERVICE DELIVERY
INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS
ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
CORRUPTION
PUBLIC FINANCES
MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT
ACCOUNTABILITY
TAX REVENUE
CAPACITY BUILDING
RISK SHARING
ASSETS
LEGAL ENVIRONMENT
EXCHANGE RATE
CREDIBILITY
PUBLIC ASSET
PENALTY
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
PENALTIES
LEGITIMACY
PUBLIC SECTOR COMPARATOR
TAX TREATMENT
POLITICAL ECONOMY
ROADS
LEGISLATORS
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
JOINT STOCK COMPANIES
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
SHAREHOLDER
PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
POLITICAL CONTROL
CREDIT ENHANCEMENT
REPAYMENTS
LENDERS
INSTITUTIONAL OBSTACLES
DOMESTIC CURRENCY
CASH FLOW
PRIVATIZATION
GOOD GOVERNANCE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY
PRIVATE FINANCE
MARKET FAILURE
CORRUPT
RISK OF CORRUPTION
DECISION MAKING PROCESS
EXTERNALITIES
PRIVATE PARTY
TRANSPARENCY
STANDARD CONTRACT
BEST PRACTICE
COLLATERAL
CAPITAL MARKETS
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
URBAN GOVERNANCE
INVESTMENT CHOICES
FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS
TREATY
WHITE ELEPHANT
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
PAYMENT SYSTEM
SUPERVISION MECHANISM
INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS
CITIZENS
PRINCIPAL-AGENT RELATIONSHIP
CORRUPT PRACTICE
BEST PRACTICES
CONTRACT DESIGN
PRIVATE INVESTOR
BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
REVOLUTION
CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS
PUBLIC SERVICES
BENEFICIARIES
PUBLIC ORGANIZATION REVIEW
DECISION-MAKING
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
EXECUTION
CONSUMER PROTECTION
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
FOREIGN CURRENCY
POLITICIANS
AUDITOR
AMOUNT OF RISK
COLLECTIVE ACTIONS
LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE
PUBLIC CONTROL
BID
INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
FINANCES
CONSTITUENCIES
INTEGRITY
COMMON LAW
PROVISIONS
INSTRUMENT
FINANCIAL RISK
DECISION MAKERS
PRIVATE INVESTMENT
TRANSACTION COSTS
DISCRETION
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
FINANCIAL INSTABILITY
CONFIDENCE
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIAL STRUCTURES
FISCAL COSTS
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
FINANCIAL STRUCTURE
REPRESENTATIVES
REGULATORY AGENCY
MARKET REFORM
SECURITIES
LEVEL PLAYING FIELD
TRANSACTION COST
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
PUBLIC SUPPORT
MARKET VALUE
AUCTIONS
PROCUREMENTS
REMEDY
ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS
LEGISLATION
PROFIT MARGIN
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
ACCOUNTING
PRIVATE SECTOR
INCOME
LOCAL AUTHORITIES
CURRENCY
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
LOCAL ADMINISTRATIONS
BIDS
INSTITUTIONALIZATION
LENDER
SCANDAL
INVESTMENT DECISION
BRIBES
PUBLIC FUND
PUBLIC FUNDS
RENEGOTIATION
PUBLIC
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
LEVEL OF RISK
PUBLIC GOODS
INVESTMENT ALTERNATIVE
LAWS
CASH FLOWS
LIABILITY
PUBLIC SECTOR PAY
EQUIPMENT
GOVERNANCE ISSUES
DEBT
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
LEGAL SYSTEM
USER CHARGES
TRANSPARENT DISCLOSURE
INITIATIVE
GOVERNMENT DEBT
BALANCE SHEET
ECONOMIC TRANSACTIONS
BIDDING
LEGAL SYSTEMS
INVESTMENT RISKS
PUBLIC WORKS
AUDITORS
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
DECISION MAKING
ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION
ABUSES
CIVIL LAW
PRIVATE PARTIES
PUBLIC OFFICIAL
RENEGOTIATIONS
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
FISCAL POLICY
EXPENDITURE
DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
PUBLIC BORROWING
TREASURY
TAX
CONSTITUTION
LEGAL INSTRUMENT
PUBLIC SERVICE
AUTHORITY
NATIONAL SECURITY
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12665Abstract
Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) provide a new 'model' for infrastructure service delivery, which combines elements borrowed from other legal economic and financial structures. A mixture of elements derived from public procurement, project finance, concession contracts, and policy network theories provides the background for PPPs structures. PPPs not only articulate such elements in one product but also constitute separate evolutions of the structures they originate from. In part, PPPs have been created to solve some problems those domains have generated or were not able to solve efficiently. However, PPPs are not meant to replace those domains but to provide alternative options to them. The natures of PPPs are associated with a new contract, procurement and relationship type. For some, a PPP is a new 'contract type' whose main characteristics are risk sharing between the public and private party; bundling of construction and operation; output base specifications; and long term commitments serve to define and distinguish the type others PPPs as a 'procurement type', alternative to traditional public procurement (including outsourcing), and concession. For some others, PPPs constitute new 'relationship types' between the Public Administration (PA), private parties and stakeholders involved in an infrastructure service delivery project. Indeed, a PPP is all of the above: a new contract, procurement, and relationship type. The origin of these typological diversities is mainly due to the different perspective legislators, practitioners, and scholars have had toward PPPs.Date
2013-03-12Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/12665http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12665
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 UnportedRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
How to Engage with the Private
 Sector in Public-Private Partnerships in Emerging MarketsFarquharson, Edward; Yescombe, E.R.; Encinas, Javier; Torres de Mastle, Clemencia (World Bank, 2011-06-14)What transforms a desirable project on a
 government wish list to an attractive investment opportunity
 in the eyes of a potential private sector partner? This
 guide seeks to enhance the chances of developing effective
 partnerships between the public and the private sectors by
 addressing one of the main obstacles to the effective
 delivery of public-private partnership (PPP) projects:
 having the right information on the right project for the
 right partners at the right time. Data from the World Bank
 and the Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility
 (PPIAF) private participation in infrastructure (PPI)
 project database indicate that private sector investment in
 infrastructure in developing economies grew steadily over
 the past decade. By 2007 the levels had finally surpassed
 the peak levels seen in 1997, the end of the previous growth
 spurt. This guide focuses specifically on what should be
 done, and when, in order to prepare projects to attract the
 right long-term private partners, procure their involvement,
 and manage the partnership. This guide is not a detailed
 project preparation manual; rather, it seeks to provide an
 overview of the process and what is involved so that greater
 realism can be applied to this challenging task and adequate
 resource plans can be developed.
-
Is the Level of Financial Sector Development a Key Determinant of Private Investment in the Power Sector?Gasmi, Farid; Ba, Lika; Noumba Um, Paul (2012-03-19)This paper seeks to assess the extent to which a country's overall level of development and that of its financial sector, in particular, are factors that attract private capital into infrastructure projects. The authors investigate these effects in a 1990-2007 dataset on the power sector in 37 developing countries. The results suggest that economic growth is a key determinant of private investors' investment in infrastructure projects, and that investors tend to take countries governance quality into account in their decisions to invest. The empirical results highlight that the development of the financial sector also plays a significant role in private investors' decisions to enter infrastructure sectors. In particular, the degree of country risk and exchange rate volatility is found to be negatively related to the volume of private sector investment in power projects. Furthermore, when the banking sector and the capital market are separately treated in the analysis, the existence of a well functioning capital market is the main attracting factor. In addition, the existence of an independent energy regulatory authority significantly improves the level of private investors' implication in energy projects. When accounting for the interactions between the overall economic development and the financial sector development variables, the effects of these variables are still significant and the results also confirm the importance of an independent energy sector regulator.
-
An Operational Framework for Managing Fiscal Commitments from Public-Private PartnershipsMousley, Peter; Martin, Helen; Shendy, Riham (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2013-02-09)The National policy on public-private partnerships (PPP) recently approved by the Government of Ghana (GoG) sets out the government's intention to use PPPs to improve the quality, cost-effectiveness, and timely provision of public infrastructure in Ghana. The PPP policy highlights the role of the government's financial support to PPPs, as well as the importance of putting in place a system to manage the associated fiscal commitments (FCs). As noted in the policy, the government's contribution to a PPP may include remuneration to the private party from government budgets, which may be fixed or partially fixed, periodic payments (annuities) and contingent. This report proposes an operational framework for managing fiscal obligations arising from PPPs in Ghana. This framework aims to ensure that PPP FCs are consistently identified and assessed during PPP project preparation, and that these assessments are fed into project approval. The report outlines roles and responsibilities, concepts, and processes for managing PPP FCs, drawing on international standards and practices, bearing in mind existing institutions and capacities in Ghana. The report also suggests legislative additions and capacity building needed to establish this framework in practice. This report focuses primarily on managing long-term FCs to PPPs, including regular payments or contingent liabilities (CL) that typically last throughout a project's lifetime. This report is structured as follows: chapter 1 is introduction; chapter; 2 introduces the concept of FCs from PPPs: how and why PPPs create FCs, why managing them is important, and an overview of what it entails; chapter 3 presents institutional roles and responsibilities; chapter 4 describes how FC management should be incorporated in the PPP development and approval process; chapter 5 describes how FCs can be managed during PPP implementation by monitoring, reporting, and budgeting adequately; and chapter 6 sets out the steps needed to begin to implement this PPP framework-to build its core requirements into the forthcoming PPP Law, and to build capacity in the relevant entities to carry out those requirements in practice.