Madagascar : Public Expenditure Review 2004 - The challenge of Poverty Reduction
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
URBAN AREASPRODUCTIVE SECTORS
PUBLIC SERVICES
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
DECISION MAKING PROCESS
PRIVATE SECTOR
HEALTH CENTERS
FISCAL REVENUES
ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
FISCAL PERFORMANCE
GOVERNMENT SERVICES
BENEFIT INCIDENCE
RURAL POVERTY
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
POLITICAL CRISIS
GENERAL ELECTIONS
DEBT
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT CAPACITY
SERVICE DELIVERY
TAX
POOR COUNTRIES
PUBLIC AGENCIES
HARD BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
ELECTRICITY
LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
SECTOR MINISTRIES
CAPACITY BUILDING
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
FISCAL
BORROWING
MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
STRUCTURAL REFORMS
POLICY REVIEW
MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK
GOVERNMENT EFFORTS
ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC WORKS
SOCIAL SECTORS
NATIONS
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
CIVIL SERVICE
MACROECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL REPORTING
HUMAN CAPITAL
EXOGENOUS SHOCKS
AUTHORITY
PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT
PRIMARY SCHOOL
SHORT TERM
TREASURY
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTATION PROCESS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
DECISION MAKING
ECONOMIC GROWTH
NATIONAL POVERTY
URBAN POPULATION
GOOD GOVERNANCE
EXECUTING AGENCIES
ROADS
FINANCIAL SECTOR
DISTRICTS
JUDICIARY
EXECUTION
NUTRITION
SECTORAL ALLOCATIONS
RURAL AREAS
EMPLOYMENT
POVERTY STRATEGY
DEBT RELIEF
REVENUE COLLECTION
ALLOCATING PUBLIC RESOURCES
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM
AVERAGE GROWTH RATE
PUBLIC SECTOR
INCOME COUNTRIES
POVERTY INDICATORS
BUDGET SYSTEMS
PRIVATE SECTOR GROWTH
HUMAN RESOURCES
MACRO/PUBLIC FINANCE
GROWTH RATE
PRIMARY SCHOOLS
POVERTY HEADCOUNT
PRIMARY EDUCATION
DECENTRALIZATION
BUDGET SYSTEM
INFLATION
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
BUDGET EXECUTION
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION
ACCOUNTING
REGIONAL DISPARITIES
CORRUPTION
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
NATIONAL BUDGET
TASK TEAM LEADER
RURAL POPULATION
PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE
STATE CONTROL
TASK TEAM LEADERS
SCHOOL SYSTEM
PUBLIC FINANCE SYSTEM
SOCIAL SERVICES
EDUCATION LEVEL
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
DECISION-MAKING
DEVELOPMENT POLICY
CIVIL SERVANTS
MORTALITY
SOCIAL INDICATORS
POVERTY REDUCTION
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
BUDGETARY RESOURCES
AIR
SOCIAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
POLICY ENVIRONMENT
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
STATE INTERVENTION
BASIC EDUCATION
SECONDARY SCHOOLS
REVENUE SHARING
INCOME QUINTILES
CASH MANAGEMENT
BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS
DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS
CITIZENS
GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE
PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
RECURRENT EXPENDITURES
SOCIAL PROTECTION
TRANSPARENCY
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
INCOME LEVEL
EDUCATION SERVICES
BUDGET EXPENDITURES
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
GOVERNMENT'S BUDGET
GOVERNMENT PROGRAM
PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM
BUDGET PROCESS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8549Abstract
This Public Expenditure Review (PER) analyzes the Government of Madagascar's efforts to meet the challenge of poverty reduction. The report first evaluates the macroeconomic and fiscal framework within which the Government is implementing its Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS). Secondly, reviews the resource allocation and current budget management process in Madagascar, and the extent to which the current budgeting, and budget management process allows the Government to effectively implement the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP). This section also deals with overall budget execution in implementing the Government policies, and the use of human resources. The final sections analyze the effective use of public resources in three priority sectors which are crucial for the implementation of the PRSP - education, transport and environment - and absorb the largest sectoral allocations. The findings of this report expand, and further deepen existing knowledge about the public finance system in Madagascar, and its contribution to the delivery of services in specific sectors. While they acknowledge Government efforts to improve the system of public finance, they confirm significant weaknesses in allocating and executing public resources at the sectoral, and cross-sectoral levels. The findings and recommendations of the report call for the development of an integrated reform program, which prioritizes intended reforms in view of the absorptive capacity of the Government machinery. At the cross-sectoral level, it is anticipated to feed the recommendations into the development of the Priority Action Plan of the Ministry of Economy, Finance and Budget (MEFB) for the year 2005. At the sectoral levels the recommendations of this report will contribute to a refinement of government's interventions, aimed at improving implementation of sectoral policies, and delivery of services.Date
2012-06-20Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/8549http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8549
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 UnportedRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Improving Public Expenditures in AgricultureAmponsah, Kofi; Annor-Frempong, Charles (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2015-12-15)The objective of the agricultural sector public expenditure review (AgPER) was to examine the
 efficiency and effectiveness of agricultural sector expenditures in Mongolia. The AgPER provides policy makers with a better understanding of: (a) trends in the level and
 composition of public expenditures in agriculture over the past five to ten years; (b) the economic
 and functional composition of agriculture expenditures; (c) the budget processes and performance in
 the agriculture sector; (d) issues inhibiting the effectiveness and efficiency of public expenditures in
 agriculture.
-
Chad Public Expenditure Review in the Agricultural, Rural Development, and Food Security SectorWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-08-13)Over the review period covered by this
 report (2003-2012), the budget allocated to agriculture
 increased noticeably more than the sector’s contribution to
 GDP. This reflects a notable effort by the Chad authorities
 to increase the budget to boost this sector’s development in
 recent years. In this proactive context, Chad signed its
 CAADP compact in December 2013 to continue supporting
 agriculture’s revival. The CAADP is being implemented in
 Chad even as the terms of the National Rural Sector
 Investment Program (PNISR, 2014-2020) are being finalized.
 Within the context of the CAADP, the Government of Chad
 (GOC) wished to undertake a review of public agriculture
 expenditures to learn from past budgetary implementation in
 this sector with a view to improving future program
 performance. Following a request by the Ministry of
 Agriculture and Irrigation (MoAI), the NEPAD planning and
 coordination agency gave Chad it’s backing for this review.
 This process was undertaken by the Program for Strengthening
 National Comprehensive Agricultural Public Expenditure in
 Sub-Saharan Africa, co-financed by the Bill and Melinda
 Gates Foundation and the CAADP Multi-Donor Trust Fund. This
 program, implemented by the World Bank, aims to improve the
 impact of the still-limited public resources available to
 governments in Sub-Saharan Africa to foster agricultural
 development and reduce poverty in rural areas, where most of
 the poor in these countries, notably Chad, live. This study
 follows and builds upon a number of similar studies
 conducted in recent years on public expenditure management,
 in particular in Chad the Action Plan for the Modernization
 of Public Finances (PAMFIP). However, these studies have
 focused on budget management as a whole, and none to date
 has looked at the agricultural sector specifically.
-
Sierra LeoneWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-07-21)This agriculture public expenditure
 review (AgPER) provides key background information and
 guidance in this endeavor by presenting and analyzing
 historic data on public spending on agriculture, examining
 the efficiency of spending, and identifying areas where
 additional funds can be applied effectively to achieve
 national agricultural policy and comprehensive Africa
 agriculture development program (CAADP) objectives. The
 goals of the AgPER in Sierra Leone are as follows: gain a
 better understanding of the countrys performance in the
 context of the 2003 Maputo declaration; draw lessons from
 the past in terms of budget execution in the agricultural
 sector and identify bottlenecks, inefficiencies, and
 deviations from goals; seek and recommend corrective actions
 for existing and future programs with a view to improving
 their impact and making them more efficient and equitable;
 initiate the implementation of the databases and methodology
 required for conducting similar reviews regularly and thus
 contribute to the institutionalization of the process; help
 the government establish an environment and capabilities for
 results-based management, with particular emphasis on
 improving planning, execution, and monitoring and
 evaluation; and increase visibility for the government and
 the financial and technical partners over the sectors
 absorptive capacity so that the decision may be made to
 allocate more resources to agricultural development. This
 report consists of five chapters: first chapter introduces
 the strategic and institutional context; second chapter
 studies the level of public agricultural expenditure in
 Sierra Leone; third chapter analyzes the economic and
 functional composition of public agricultural expenditure
 (allocative efficiency); fourth chapter assesses the
 technical efficiency of the processes of preparation,
 execution, and monitoring and evaluation of agricultural
 budgets; and fifth chapter contains our findings and recommendations.