Promouvoir la bonne gouvernance par les fonds sociaux et la d?ntralisation
Author(s)
Parker, AndrewKeywords
CENTRAL GOVERNMENTGOVERNANCE
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
CORRUPTION
FISCAL
LOCAL COMMUNITIES ACCOUNTABILITY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS
SOCIAL PROTECTION
SOCIAL POLICY
ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES
BASIC SERVICES
MUNICIPAL FINANCE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
COMMUNITIES
SOCIAL FUNDS
COMMUNITY PROJECTS
LOCAL CAPACITY
DECENTRALIZATION
SOCIAL FUNDS
NATIONS
LOCAL TAXES
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
DECENTRALIZATION REFORMS
DECENTRALIZATION
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
COMMUNITY GROUPS
DECISIONMAKING
TRANSPARENCY
GOOD GOVERNANCE
REPRESENTATIVES
PROCUREMENT
PA
SUBVERSION
CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9817Abstract
Bad governance undermines development. Two important types of World Bank support for local governance are social funds and broadly based support for governments committed to decentralizing responsibility and power to local governments and other local institutions. But there are concerns that these two approaches, which address different elements of governance, sometimes work at cross-purposes. A study was therefore commissioned to examine the interaction between social funds and decentralization in Bolivia and Honduras (advanced decentralization), Peru and Zimbabwe (some decentralization), and Cambodia, Malawi, and Zambia (little or no decentralization). This Note is based on the findings of the study.Date
2001-04Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/9817http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9817
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Sub-National Performance Incentives in the Intergovernmental FrameworkSmoke, Paul; Lewis, Blane D. (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2008-06)This paper provides background for the
 Government of Indonesia as it considers if and how to
 introduce more robust local government performance
 incentives into the intergovernmental fiscal framework. The
 next section briefly examines the forces that have driven
 the recent national wave of interest in improving local
 government performance. This is followed by a review of the
 relatively limited set of local government performance
 incentives currently in force in Indonesia. The fourth
 section provides a conceptual overview of how to think about
 the possible expansion of local government incentive
 programs, outlining the potential role(s) of such programs
 in general and the key issues involved in designing and
 implementing them. The fifth section tentatively considers a
 number of options for additional local government incentives
 in Indonesia that the central government may wish to
 consider pursuing. The paper concludes with an outline of
 next steps for moving forward with the possible development
 of more purposeful and meaningful performance incentives in
 Indonesia's intergovernmental fiscal framework.
-
Decentralization, Accountability and Local Services in Sierra Leone : Situation Analysis, Key Challenges and Opportunities for ReformWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-04-15)Following years of civil war that ended
 in 2002, Sierra Leone has pursued a policy of
 decentralization, devolving responsibility for many
 government functions to the Local Council level. The aims of
 this policy include achieving a more equitable and inclusive
 access to public services across the national territory, in
 part to alleviate regional inequities that contributed to
 the civil war. The implementation of the decentralization
 policy has faced many obstacles, however, including the need
 to rebuild local government institutions and capacity after
 30 years of centrally dominated governance; the limited
 devolution of financial resources; and multifaceted
 political economy hurdles. This report, first, analyzes the
 current state of decentralization in Sierra Leone; second,
 identifies the most prominent challenges to continued
 decentralization; and, third, discusses options for the way
 forward. The report draws on qualitative and quantitative
 data collected from both central and local government
 stakeholders, and takes the perspective that
 decentralization and strengthened local governance
 institutions are an effective means to localize development
 and improve the effective and equitable delivery of key
 public services. The study focuses on progress to date and
 standing challenges in four key areas of analysis: fiscal
 decentralization, human resource decentralization, ensuring
 inclusivity and accountability in local governance, and
 ensuring efficiency and responsiveness in service delivery.
-
Local Governance in Developing CountriesShah, Anwar (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012-06-05)This book develops a comparative institutional framework for responsive, responsible, and accountable governance in developing countries. It provides a synthesis of analytical literature on local governance. It traces the historical evolution of local governance and presents a stylized view of alternative models of local governance practiced in various countries. It also presents case studies for 10 countries by leading national and international scholars. The country case studies present an in-depth view of local government organization and finance in each country.