Strategic Communication for Privatization, Public-Private Partnerships, and Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects
Author(s)
Calabrese, DanieleKeywords
PRIVATIZATION PROGRAMSDIVESTMENTS
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
SHAREHOLDERS
PUBLIC INTEREST
PUBLIC ASSETS
REFORM PROGRAM
PRIVATIZATION POLICY
NATIONALIZATION
PRIVATIZATION PLAN
PRIVATIZATION
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
REGULATORY AUTHORITY
PRIVATE CAPITAL
DIVESTMENT
MULTINATIONAL
PUBLIC POLICIES
CAPITAL MARKET
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
CORRUPTION
LEGAL SYSTEM
PROPERTY RIGHTS
BIDDERS
PRIVATE OPERATOR
ASSETS
DEBT
PRIVATIZATION TRANSACTION
ECONOMIC CRISIS
PRIVATIZATION PROJECT
CONSEQUENCES OF PRIVATIZATION
GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE
ECONOMIC REFORM PROGRAM
COMPETITIVE SALE PROCEDURES
PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION
ECONOMIC REFORMS
REGULATORY STRUCTURE
PUBLIC PROVISION
CONFIDENCE
CIVIL SOCIETY
STATE OWNERSHIP
INITIATIVE
REMEDY
OPPONENTS OF PRIVATIZATION
LAWS
POLITICAL RISKS
PUBLIC OFFERINGS
NATIONAL PRIVATIZATION
COMPLAINT
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
PUBLIC FUNDS
OUTPUT
PUBLIC AUTHORITIES
PUBLIC SERVICE
JUDICIAL SYSTEM
EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
INFORMATION SHARING
NATIONAL PRIVATIZATION PROGRAM
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
PRIVATIZATION PROCESSES
PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM
PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
PATRONAGE
BUREAUCRATIC HOSTILITY
PRIVATIZATION PROGRAM
BANK OPERATIONS
LEGAL FRAMEWORKS
MARKET CONDITIONS
PRIVATIZATION STRATEGIES
INSTITUTIONAL SETTING
OUTPUTS
PRIVATIZATION STRATEGY
MARKET ECONOMY
ANTICORRUPTION
CONTRACT ENFORCEMENT
MANAGEMENT CONTRACT
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
PRIVATIZATION LAW
PRIVATE PARTICIPATION
INTEGRITY
INCOME
LOCAL COMPANIES
PUBLIC WORKS
REGULATOR
POLITICAL OPPONENTS
PUBLIC SECTOR
BIDDING
AUCTIONS
MINISTER
GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION
INVESTIGATION
SOCIAL SAFETY NET
PUBLIC RELATION
BENEFITS OF PRIVATIZATION
PUBLIC FINANCES
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY
REFORM PROGRAMS
PRIVATE INITIATIVES
REGULATORS
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
EXECUTIVE PRIVATIZATION COMMISSION
PRIVATIZATION TRANSACTIONS
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE
POLITICAL MACHINE
PRIVATIZATION PROCESS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
NEPOTISM
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY
INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATIZATION
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
LIQUIDATION
LEGAL CONSTRAINTS
LEGAL STATUS
LEADERSHIP
DEVELOPING COUNTRY
POLITICAL RISK
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE
POTENTIAL INVESTORS
PRIVATE COMPANIES
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MEDIA
POLITICAL UNREST
ENTERPRISE MANAGERS
INFORMATION FLOW
ADVOCACY GROUPS
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
PRIVATIZATION AGENCY
PUBLIC REVENUES
LABOR UNIONS
STAKEHOLDERS
FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
CORRUPT
POLITICAL POWER
INCOMES
PUBLIC AUCTIONS
SERVICE DELIVERY
PRIVATE FINANCE
PRIVATIZATION PROCEEDS
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP
PUBLIC SERVICES
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS
FOREIGN OWNERSHIP
PRIVATIZATION AGENCIES
TRANSPARENCY
PUBLIC POLICY
PRIVATE BUSINESS
POLITICAL ECONOMY
POLITICAL LEADERS
POLITICAL INTERFERENCE
POLITICAL INTERESTS
COPYRIGHT CLEARANCE CENTER
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
ECONOMIC REFORM
CONCEPT OF PRIVATIZATION
CIVIL SERVANTS
REGULATORY AUTHORITIES
MINISTERS
PRIVATE OPERATORS
FORMS OF PRIVATIZATION
POLITICAL OPPOSITION
DEVELOPMENT FUND
BIDS
MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS
OPPOSITION TO PRIVATIZATION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PRIVATE SECTOR
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
LOCAL POLITICIANS
PUBLIC OVERSIGHT
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT
TYPES OF PRIVATIZATION
CORRUPT PRACTICES
METHODS OF PRIVATIZATION
CUSTOMER BASE
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
PUBLIC CONFIDENCE
PUBLIC GOOD
AUCTION
PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
PUBLIC RELATIONS
JOINT VENTURE
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
GOOD GOVERNANCE
POLITICIANS
LOBBYING
TRANSPARENT MECHANISMS
ACCOUNTABILITY
FIRM COMMITMENT
COPYRIGHT CLEARANCE
PRIVATE COMPANY
POLITICAL UNCERTAINTY
BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES
PROCUREMENT
PUBLIC ENTERPRISE
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6522Abstract
This publication reviews the experiences of the World Bank and its clients in employing public communication programs during the processes of privatization and private sector participation. Drawing from academic and policy research as well as from case studies, it highlights good practices and identifies lessons learned through an examination of successes and failures. This publication also recommends principles of strategic communication and offers a methodology for researching and analyzing the communication issues associated with privatization and private sector participation. It includes an operational approach to design and implementation of public communication programs for the various forms of privatization and public-private initiatives. This publication is divided into two sections. The first section includes examples of privatization efforts, failures and successes, noting the role that was played by communication, or lack thereof. The second section sets out the key concepts and tools that communication specialists bring to privatization programs, along with examples of their effective use in both developed and developing countries.Date
2008Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/6522978-0-8213-7499-3
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6522
Copyright/License
Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 UnportedRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Is the Level of Financial Sector Development a Key Determinant of Private Investment in the Power Sector?Gasmi, Farid; Ba, Lika; Noumba Um, Paul (2012-03-19)This paper seeks to assess the extent to which a country's overall level of development and that of its financial sector, in particular, are factors that attract private capital into infrastructure projects. The authors investigate these effects in a 1990-2007 dataset on the power sector in 37 developing countries. The results suggest that economic growth is a key determinant of private investors' investment in infrastructure projects, and that investors tend to take countries governance quality into account in their decisions to invest. The empirical results highlight that the development of the financial sector also plays a significant role in private investors' decisions to enter infrastructure sectors. In particular, the degree of country risk and exchange rate volatility is found to be negatively related to the volume of private sector investment in power projects. Furthermore, when the banking sector and the capital market are separately treated in the analysis, the existence of a well functioning capital market is the main attracting factor. In addition, the existence of an independent energy regulatory authority significantly improves the level of private investors' implication in energy projects. When accounting for the interactions between the overall economic development and the financial sector development variables, the effects of these variables are still significant and the results also confirm the importance of an independent energy sector regulator.
-
Making Public Sector Reforms Work : Political and Economic Contexts, Incentives, and StrategiesBunse, Simone; Fritz, Verena (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2012-08)Supporting effective public sector reform is a major challenge that the World Bank and other agencies and stakeholders have been grappling with. It is increasingly recognized that political economy factors play a crucial role. However, beyond this broad proposition, specific questions arise: What country contexts are more/less propitious for public sector reforms and what reforms are likely to succeed where? And can more explicitly taking political economy challenges into account help to pursue public sector reforms even in less propitious contexts? This paper addresses these issues in two ways: first, it draws on the existing literature to identify key propositions about factors that can trigger or facilitate public sector reforms, and those that tend to work against (successful) reforms. Second, it investigates the experience of World Bank public sector operations over the decade 2000-2010. It finds that governments in many developing countries face incentives to initiate public sector reforms, but that at the implementation stage, political costs frequently outweigh potential gains; and hence reforms are abandoned or left to wither. Real breakthroughs have been achieved in countries experiencing major structural shifts and those having political leadership committed to higher-level goals. The review of operations shows that successful projects are significantly more widespread than the literature would lead to assume. Furthermore, it provides tentative evidence that investing in understanding political economy drivers has been associated with better project performance. Key implications are the need to differentiate between country contexts more clearly ex ante, concentrate more on reform implementation during windows of opportunity that are typically of limited duration, and design reforms with a clear plan of engagement with stakeholder incentives.
-
Peru : Country Procurement Assessment Report (CPAR), UpdateWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-21)Since the 2001 CPAR, Peru has made considerable progress in setting in motion the right conditions to improve public procurement. The primary regulator for procurement, the High Council for Government Procurement (CONSUCODE), has been strengthened; the development of the e-government procurement system has begun; significant training initiatives are underway; and important amendments have been made to the procurement law and its regulations. In addition, a very good Integrated Financial Management System has been implemented in all public sector entities. These initial achievements in procurement reform have complemented a deepening democratization process and Peru's impressive macroeconomic performance over the last few years. Several institutions play important roles, defined by law, in public sector procurement. However, there is no unifying vision of the system's objectives and priorities. Consequently, the initial reforms implemented by the Government were not framed within a comprehensive policy that includes a consistent strategy on how to move forward with the reform program and establishes clear leadership. Recommended short term actions include bringing all key institutions to an agreement for a detailed reform strategy with clearly defined leadership and objectives; emphasizing prevention over control and consolidating the supervisory role of the CONSUCODE; adopting a set of tools in the short-term to facilitate implementation of the reform; carrying out in-depth market studies, reviewing the Government supply processes, and implementing cost reduction strategies; and accelerating the development of e-government procurement. Mid-term actions include further streamlining the regulatory framework; and engaging civil society in a more constructive fashion. Suggested long-term actions include significantly strengthening human resource infrastructure and the procurement capacity of local governments.