Author(s)
Shah, AnwarKeywords
CITIZENSBUDGETARY INSTITUTIONS
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
POOR GOVERNANCE
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
NATIONAL ACCOUNTS
EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT
INTERNAL CONTROLS
RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
PRUDENT FISCAL MANAGEMENT
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY
DECENTRALIZATION
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
CASH MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
PROGRAM DESIGN
CAPITAL BUDGET
SOCIAL CAPITAL
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SECTOR BUDGETING
FINANCIAL CONTROL
FISCAL AUTHORITY
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ACCOUNTABILITY FOR PERFORMANCE
ACCOUNTING
BUDGETING PROCESS
LOCAL FINANCE
EXPENDITURE FORECASTING
PUBLIC RESOURCES
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE
ANNUAL BUDGET
CAPITAL BUDGETING
BUDGET PROCESS
LOCAL REVENUE
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
PERFORMANCE CULTURE
DEMOCRATIC ACCOUNTABILITY
FISCAL CONTROLS
STATE BUDGET
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
CAPITAL INVESTMENTS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
PERFORMANCE BUDGETING
FINANCIAL PROBLEMS
LOCAL AUTHORITIES
MOTIVATIONS
BUDGETARY PRACTICES
EXPENDITURE RESPONSIBILITIES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUDGETING
FINANCIAL MARKETS
CITIZENSHIP
REVENUE GROWTH
HARD BUDGET CONSTRAINT
DEBT MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REFORM
REVENUE ESTIMATES
LOCAL BUDGETS
STATE GOVERNMENTS
CORRUPTION
FINANCIAL CONDITION
FISCAL RESOURCES
LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY
TAX COLLECTION
ACCOUNTABILITY FOR RESULTS
FISCAL TRANSPARENCY
MACROECONOMIC STABILITY
TAX RATES
OUTPUT BUDGETING
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
FISCAL OPERATIONS
PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTABILITY
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
BUDGET DOCUMENTS
NATIONAL LEVEL
BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION
PUBLIC GOVERNANCE
POLICY FORMULATION
PUBLIC BUDGETING
PUBLIC SERVICES
INTEREST PAYMENTS
INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONSHIPS
SOFT BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
EXPENDITURE CONTROL
DEBT
REVENUE ADMINISTRATION
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
TAX BURDENS
FISCAL SYSTEMS
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
LOCAL BODIES
GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE
FISCAL ASSUMPTIONS
BUDGET INSTITUTIONS
BUDGET DEVELOPMENT
FISCAL FEDERALISM
SERVICE DELIVERY
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW
GOVERNMENT BUDGETS
TAXATION
ACCOUNTABILITY
EXECUTION
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
PUBLIC POLICY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
GOOD GOVERNANCE
FISCAL STRESS
PERFORMANCE BUDGET
CHRONICALLY HIGH DEFICITS
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
GOVERNMENT SPENDING
CAPITAL INFRASTRUCTURE
GOVERNMENT FINANCES
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUDGETS
HARD BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
TAX ADMINISTRATION
BUDGET EXECUTION
DECENTRALIZATION POLICIES
GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES
TRANSPARENCY
FISCAL ADMINISTRATION
BUDGET FORMULATION
GOVERNMENT REVENUES
PUBLIC SECTOR
LEGAL STRUCTURE
BUDGET PRACTICES
INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
LOCAL TAX
LOCAL PUBLIC FINANCE
ACCOUNTABILITY IN GOVERNANCE
LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
REVENUE FORECASTING
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
DECISION MAKERS
SOCIAL EQUITY
REVENUE CAPACITY
PRIVATE MARKET
EXPENDITURE PLANS
POVERTY REDUCTION
PUBLIC BORROWING
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
BALANCE SHEETS
DEMOCRACY
SECTOR PROGRAMS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC SERVICE
STRATEGIC RESOURCE ALLOCATION
PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE
DECISION MAKING
FEDERALISM
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
REVENUE SOURCES
SERVICE PROVISION
LOCAL AUTHORITY
FISCAL DISCIPLINE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY
FISCAL TRANSFERS
EXPENDITURES
PRIORITIES OF GOVERNMENT
EXTERNAL ACCOUNTABILITY
BUDGET CYCLE
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
PUBLIC AFFAIRS
TRANSITION ECONOMIES
TAX POLICY
PUBLIC FINANCE
FISCAL PRUDENCE
PUBLIC ECONOMICS
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
EXPENDITURE FORECASTS
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6669Abstract
This publication, Local Budgeting, provides a comprehensive guide for local administrators who are involved in designing and implementing budgetary institutions and who wish to improve efficiency and equity in service delivery and to strengthen internal and external accountability. It details principles and practices to improve fiscal management. It reviews techniques available in developing countries for forecasting revenues and expenditures, and it examines institutional arrangements for ensuring transparency and fiscal discipline. In addition, it outlines some strategies to deal with corruption in local revenue administration. With respect to budgeting, the volume discusses the decisions that need to be made in determining budget format and layout, including the scope of the budget, the degree of transparency of the legal requirements underlying the budget, and the extent to which the budget will emphasize inputs, outputs, and outcomes. Local Budgeting also discusses the role of the capital budget. It details how performance budgeting can serve as a tool for results-based accountability to citizens. It helps the non-specialist reader learn how to interpret budget documents to discover what the government is doing and how well it is performing its tasks. It highlights approaches to stakeholder inputs in the budget process. Finally, it explores the role of budget execution in ensuring management flexibility while enhancing democratic accountability.Date
2007Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/6669http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6669
0-8213-6945-8
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Decentralization, Accountability and Local Services in Sierra Leone : Situation Analysis, Key Challenges and Opportunities for ReformWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-04-15)Following years of civil war that ended
 in 2002, Sierra Leone has pursued a policy of
 decentralization, devolving responsibility for many
 government functions to the Local Council level. The aims of
 this policy include achieving a more equitable and inclusive
 access to public services across the national territory, in
 part to alleviate regional inequities that contributed to
 the civil war. The implementation of the decentralization
 policy has faced many obstacles, however, including the need
 to rebuild local government institutions and capacity after
 30 years of centrally dominated governance; the limited
 devolution of financial resources; and multifaceted
 political economy hurdles. This report, first, analyzes the
 current state of decentralization in Sierra Leone; second,
 identifies the most prominent challenges to continued
 decentralization; and, third, discusses options for the way
 forward. The report draws on qualitative and quantitative
 data collected from both central and local government
 stakeholders, and takes the perspective that
 decentralization and strengthened local governance
 institutions are an effective means to localize development
 and improve the effective and equitable delivery of key
 public services. The study focuses on progress to date and
 standing challenges in four key areas of analysis: fiscal
 decentralization, human resource decentralization, ensuring
 inclusivity and accountability in local governance, and
 ensuring efficiency and responsiveness in service delivery.
-
Serbia Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Performance ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-06-29)A Public Expenditure and Financial
 accountability (PEFA) repeat assessment was conducted in the
 Republic of Serbia (RoS) between November 2014 and May 2015
 by an independent team of experts, led by the World Bank
 (WB). The assessment was financed jointly by the
 Strengthening of Accountability and the Fiduciary
 Environment (SAFE) Trust Fund of the Swiss State Secretariat
 for Economic Affairs (SECO), the European Union Delegation
 to Serbia (EU Delegation) and WB. The period covered by this
 Assessment (2011-2013) was dominated by the challenges posed
 by the aftermath of the global economic recession which
 affected macro-fiscal performances. Notwithstanding these
 challenges PFM improvements can be observed in strengthening
 legislative framework, and Budget classification, multi-year
 fiscal planning, procurement and external audit. In other
 areas such as the composition of expenditure out-turn
 compared with originally approved budget, expenditures
 arrears, oversight of fiscal risk, and effectiveness of tax
 collection, predictability in the availability of funds,
 application of public sector accounting standards
 application and legislative scrutiny of annual budget law
 and final accounts, further work is needed to improve PFM performance.
-
Argentina : Country Financial Accountability AssessmentWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-14)This Country Financial Accountability
 Assessment (CFAA) for Argentina was prepared jointly by the
 World Bank (WB) and the Inter-American Development Bank
 (IDB) on the basis of information timely collected during
 two missions that visited Argentina in December 2005 and
 April 2006. The objective of this CFAA is to provide: (i) a
 diagnosis of national-level Public Financial Management
 (PFM) systems and practices; and (ii) an analysis of major
 issues that affect national-level PFM core processes, such
 as budgeting, accounting and financial reporting, and debt
 management and the control system. In addition, this CFAA
 provides an analysis of PFM arrangements for World Bank (WB)
 and Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) funded operations.
 The CFAA also assesses progress and points to further steps
 leading to better PFM, identifies the effect of the
 country's last economic crisis on that trajectory,
 describes the strengths and challenges of the system as it
 currently works and the obstacles impeding further progress,
 and recommends short and long run corrective measures.