Tanzania - Public Expenditure Review (Vol. 2 of 2) : Consolidating the Medium Term Expenditure Framework
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
DEBT RELIEFPOVERTY REDUCTION
ROADS & HIGHWAYS
PUBLIC SECTOR DIVESTMENT
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
FOREIGN PARTICIPATION
PRIVATISATION
ACCOUNTING
PRIORITY AREAS
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
RATIONALIZATION
INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS
REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS
CAPITAL MARKETS
NUTRITION
GENERAL ELECTIONS
PUBLIC HEALTH
PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION
EDUCATION SECTOR
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
ROADS
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
SERVICE DELIVERY
TREASURY
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
REFORM POLICY
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
CIVIL SERVICE
PUBLIC FINANCE
LIQUIDATION
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
COMMERCIAL BANKS
ECONOMIC GROWTH
INFLATION
FISCAL POLICY
NATIONAL POLICY FRAMEWORK
AUTHORITY
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
HEALTH SECTOR
RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS
SOCIAL SECTORS
TRANSPARENCY
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
PARASTATALS
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
PRODUCTIVE SECTORS
MACROECONOMICS
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
BASIC EDUCATION
RURAL POPULATION
WATER SECTOR
PARASTATAL SECTOR
PUBLIC RESOURCES
STRUCTURAL REFORMS
PUBLIC SERVICE REFORM
PRIVATIZATION
ELECTRICITY
PRIVATE BANKS
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
TASK TEAM LEADER
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
PARTICIPATORY APPROACH
COUNCILS
APPROPRIATIONS
HIV VIRUSES
PUBLIC SERVICE
BUDGETARY PROCESS
FINANCIAL SECTOR
TRANSPORT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
EXCHANGE RATE
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENT
DEBT SERVICE
SECTORAL ALLOCATION
RECURRENT EXPENDITURES
INSURANCE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
FISCAL PERFORMANCE
FISCAL DISCIPLINE
FOREIGN ASSETS
CONFEDERATION
BUDGET PROCESSES
SECTOR MINISTRIES
MICROFINANCE
JUDICIARY
LAND TENURE LAW
ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES
BUDGET PERFORMANCE
ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
DEBT
FISCAL MEASURES
FISCAL YEAR
BANKING SYSTEM
DEFICIT FINANCING
FISCAL DEFICIT
RURAL AREAS
GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
URBAN AREAS
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
GROWTH RATE
REVENUE COLLECTION
WATER SUPPLY PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
SOCIAL SERVICES
FINANCIAL SERVICES
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPOSITS
PRODUCTIVITY
GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS
MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
NATIONS
OVERALL EXPENDITURE
TAX
TAX SYSTEM
AGRICULTURE SECTOR ADJUSTMENT
DEBT SUSTAINABILTY
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
FOREIGN RESERVES
BUDGET PROCESS
FISCAL STANCE
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGES
BUDGET SYSTEM
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
PRIVATE SECTOR
URBAN POPULATION
FOREIGN INVESTORS
JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION
INSTITUTIONALIZATION
NATIONAL POLICY
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS
ECONOMIC COOPERATION
MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS
PRIMARY EDUCATION
PUBLIC SECTOR
GOOD GOVERNANCE
FOOD SECURITY
REVENUE AVAILABILITY
CAPACITY BUILDING
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
POVERTY ERADICATION
DEVELOPMENT POLICY
REHABILITATION
MACROECONOMIC STABILITY
CHECKING
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
SECTORAL ALLOCATIONS
FISCAL
CURRENCY UNIT
PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM
COMMODITIES
ADJUSTMENT LENDING
FISCAL BALANCE
MACROECONOMIC STABILIZATION
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES
BANK OF TANZANIA
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
Full record
Afficher la notice complèteOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15491Abstract
This Public Expenditure Review (PER) for FY00, provided support to the Government of Tanzania in the preparation of its budget, and Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF), and performed as well an external evaluation of the country's budget performance. The report contains two volumes, the Main Report (v. I) first describes the main features of the PER process, to then present the main findings emerging from a review of fiscal performance, and public expenditure management in Tanzania. A discussion of systemic fiscal issues, critical to enhancing the effectiveness of public expenditure follows, to reach a series of updated sectoral expenditure reviews, prioritizing on education, health, water, agriculture, works, land and justice. Volume II, presents the Government's MTEF for FY-01/03, in which the macroeconomic context is described, providing a cross sectoral MTEF within the priority sectors. In addition, a detailed discussion of the public sector reform program is presented, including discussions on the HIV/AIDS epidemic, identified as a key challenge to development efforts, requiring a multi-sectoral approach to contain its spread. Despite progress in consolidating the budget process, and macroeconomic policy, the transitional status of the country's economy, makes macroeconomic management particularly difficult. The report suggests rethinking the MTEF's contingency plans, within a flexible framework to further improve the linkages between prioritization, and the budgetary process.Date
2013-08-29Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/15491http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15491
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 UnportedRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
West Bank and Gaza Public Expenditure Review : From Crisis to Greater Fiscal Independence, Volume 2World Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-12)This report examines the fiscal crisis
 facing the Palestinian Authority (PA) that could threaten
 its very existence. It looks at recent macroeconomic and
 fiscal developments and gives and analysis of key issues and
 challenges such as economic and fiscal trends. The report
 also goes in depth analysis of the public financial
 management issues, the challenges of civil service reform,
 reforming intergovernmental fiscal relations, the education
 sector, and social policy and social safety nets. The report
 is divided into two volumes with volume one giving an
 overview with conclusions and recommendations, while volume
 gives an in depth look at the topics.
-
Argentina : Country Financial Accountability AssessmentWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-14)This Country Financial Accountability
 Assessment (CFAA) for Argentina was prepared jointly by the
 World Bank (WB) and the Inter-American Development Bank
 (IDB) on the basis of information timely collected during
 two missions that visited Argentina in December 2005 and
 April 2006. The objective of this CFAA is to provide: (i) a
 diagnosis of national-level Public Financial Management
 (PFM) systems and practices; and (ii) an analysis of major
 issues that affect national-level PFM core processes, such
 as budgeting, accounting and financial reporting, and debt
 management and the control system. In addition, this CFAA
 provides an analysis of PFM arrangements for World Bank (WB)
 and Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) funded operations.
 The CFAA also assesses progress and points to further steps
 leading to better PFM, identifies the effect of the
 country's last economic crisis on that trajectory,
 describes the strengths and challenges of the system as it
 currently works and the obstacles impeding further progress,
 and recommends short and long run corrective measures.
-
Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability AssessmentGovernment of Nepal Ministry of Finance (World Bank, Kathmandu, 2015-05)The objective of this assessment is to
 update the public expenditure and financial accountability
 (PEFA) assessment published in early 2008. The assessment is
 expected to assist the Government of Nepal to: (a) establish
 indicator led assessment of the country’s public financial
 management (PFM) system, (b) update the fiduciary
 environment of the PFM systems and processes of the country,
 and (c) assist in identifying those parts of the PFM system
 that may need further reform and development. The
 institutional and organizational approach taken by the
 Government of Nepal ensured coordination among various
 government institutions. The assessment included collection
 of additional documentation, including meeting minutes, and
 interviews with government counterpart teams and main
 stakeholders. The report was updated and refined following
 advice from a World Bank team. A specialist in the use of
 PEFA methodology assisted in the later drafts and visited
 Nepal in August 17-20, 2014. Meetings were held with the
 PEFA Secretariat at the Financial Comptroller General Office
 (FCGO) and with the Ministry of Finance (MoF) Budget
 Division. This final draft of the report addresses all the
 comments received up to November 31, 2014. The findings of
 the assessment were shared with the donors in September 2014
 and their comments assisted the finalization of the draft
 report. The World Bank also provided continuous quality
 control support.