Evaluation of the International Finance Corporation's Global Trade Finance Program, 2006-12
Author(s)
Independent Evaluation GroupKeywords
Finance Corporationfinancial systems
Actual Financial Performance
credit agency
trading
Letter of Credit
payment obligation
financial crisis
Global Risks
partner banks
private capital
returns
Financial Intermediation
market levels
beneficiaries
risk perceptions
finance products
Advisory Services
legal agreement
market conditions
bank relationships
pricing practices
approval process
emerging markets
Supply Chain
Bank Financing
economic crises
development bank
poor credit
Commercial Bank
developing country
economic crisis
middle-income countries
commercial banks
macroeconomic risks
banking supervision
new market
deposits
foreign bank
market volatility
warrants
information technology
long-term finance
instrument
financial sector
local banks
reputation
creditworthiness
country risks
credit limit
maturities
information system
profitability
finance product
long-term loans
development finance
Income
Long-Term Investments
transaction price
Portfolio
information sharing
default rate
emerging market
sovereign debt
financial markets
risk taking
Bank Credit
trade credit
income group
debts
cash deposits
debt
loan
Trade Finance
credit rating
financing of trade
equipment
transparency
private sector development
market demand
Bank Risk
Chamber of Commerce
capital allocation
regulatory constraints
political risk
Risk Mitigation
liquidity constraints
country risk
International Development
Multilateral Development
market trade
Monetary Fund
debt crisis
rapid growth
market players
Multilateral Development Banks
borrowing
risk sharing
capital gains
world economy
credit lines
commodities
income level
international banks
emerging market countries
banking systems
banking sector
loss statement
Credit Risk
credit quality
savings
loan size
microenterprises
exposure
International Finance
portfolio performance
political uncertainty
net profit
banking crisis
private credit
Credit Transaction
Banks
Liquidity
Global Trade
local bank
intangible
performance measures
client base
statistical analysis
direct loans
cash flow
emerging market trade
banking system
access to finance
investment activities
working capital
subordinated debt
investment volume
exporter
less developed markets
loan recovery
Telecommunications
CC
international bank
agricultural products
equity investments
capital requirements
regional banks
insurance
banking regulation
Portfolio Management
return
collateral requirements
long-term investment
particular countries
MDB
Middle-income country
collateral
lines of credit
export credit
weak banking systems
opportunity costs
financial intermediaries
access to information
financial sector development
farmers
Finance Initiatives
short-term trade finance
macroeconomic instability
financial institutions
low-income countries
risk profile
credit growth
emerging market portfolio
Developing Countries
risk aversion
Warehouse
Low-income country
income statements
Financial Performance
beneficiary
letters of credit
individual markets
entry point
development finance institutions
defaults
financial challenges
due diligence
risk weight
prudential regulations
financial instability
International Trade
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15769Abstract
The International Finance Corporation (IFC) introduced the Global Trade Finance Program (GTFP) in 2005 is to 'support the extension of trade finance to underserved clients globally.' The program has since expanded rapidly, and its authorized exposure ceiling was increased in three stages from $500 million in 2005 to $5 billion in 2012. In FY12, the GTFP accounted for 39 percent of total IFC commitments, 53 percent of its commitments in Sub Saharan Africa, and 48 percent of its commitments in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) recommends that IFC (i) continue to strengthen the GTFP's focus in areas where additionally is high and increase the share of the program in high-risk markets and where the supply of trade finance and alternate risk-mitigation instruments are less available; (ii) adopt additional methods of reporting volume that can reflect the distinct nature of trade finance guarantees; (iii) refine the means by which GTFP profitability is monitored and reported; (iv) review the costs and benefits of the current monitoring and evaluation framework; (v) ensure that a transparent process is in place to govern cases of covenant breach; and (vi) enhance the program's ability to meet the demand for coverage of longer-term trade finance tenors.Date
2013-09-13Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/15769978-0-8213-9980-4
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15769
DOI
10.1596/978-0-8213-9980-4Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 Unportedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1596/978-0-8213-9980-4
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Trade Finance during the Great Trade CollapseChauffour, Jean-Pierre; Malouche, Mariem (World Bank, 2012-03-19)The bursting of the subprime mortgage market in the United States in 2008 and the ensuing global financial crisis were associated with a rapid decline in global trade. The extent of the trade collapse was unprecedented: trade flows fell at a faster rate than had been observed even in the early years of the great depression. G-20 leaders held their first crisis-related summit in November 2008. The goal was to understand the root causes of the global crisis and to reach consensus on actions to address its immediate effects. In the case of trade, a key question concerned the extent to which a drying up of trade finance caused the observed decline in trade flows. This book brings together a range of projects and studies undertaken by development institutions, export credit agencies, private bankers, and academics to shed light on the role of trade finance in the 2008-09 great trade collapse. It provides policy makers, analysts, and other interested parties with analyses and assessments of the role of governments and institutions in restoring trade finance markets. A deeper understanding of the complexity of trade finance remains critical as the world economy recovers and the supply of trade finance improves. The international community continues to know too little about the fragility of low income economies in response to trade finance developments and shocks, as well as about the ability and conditions of access to trade finance by small and medium enterprises and small banks in developing countries. Similarly, there is uncertainty regarding the impact on trade finance of recent changes in the third Basel regulatory framework.
-
Trade Finance in Crisis : Should Developing Countries Establish Export Credit Agencies?Chauffour, Jean-Pierre; Soylemezoglu, Ahmet I.; Saborowski, Christian (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2010-01)New data on export insurance and guarantees suggest that publicly backed export credit agencies have played a role to prevent a complete drying up of trade finance markets during the current financial crisis. Given that export credit agencies are mainly located in advanced and emerging economies, the question arises whether developing countries that are not equipped with these agencies should establish their own agencies to support exporting firms and avoid trade finance shortages in times of crisis. This paper highlights a number of issues requiring attention in the decision whether to establish such specialized financial institutions. It concludes that developing countries should consider export credit agencies only when certain pre-requirements in terms of financial capacity, institutional capability, and governance are met.
-
Trade Finance in Crisis : Market Adjustment or Market Failure?Chauffour, Jean-Pierre; Farole, Thomas (2009-07-01)As world leaders have agreed to
 massively support trade finance, this paper discusses the
 singularity of the issues related to trade finance in the
 context of the global economic crisis. Why should
 international trade finance be a particular issue of concern
 in the current circumstances? Are there specific market or
 government failures associated with trade finance that
 justify a special and differential treatment of the issue by
 policymakers? If so, what would then be the most appropriate
 policy instruments to address those concerns? The paper
 cautions against the notion of a large trade finance
 "gap," yet highlights the possible rationales and
 conditions for an effective intervention in support of trade finance.