Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya : A Public Expenditure Review, Volume 1. Synthesis
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
LOCAL GOVERNMENTSBUDGET REQUESTS
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
COST-EFFECTIVENESS
SOCIAL PROGRAMS
AGGREGATE CEILINGS
SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS
SERVICE PROVIDERS
LICENSES
EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
MUNICIPALITIES
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
INFLATION
MINISTERIAL AGENCIES
UTILITIES
NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIES
PROGRAMS
UNCERTAINTY
MARGINAL COST
PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAM
PRICE STABILITY
SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY
MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
FINANCIAL ASSETS
FISCAL IMPACT
SERVICE DELIVERY
DISCRETIONARY ALLOWANCES
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE GROWTH
PUBLIC ASSETS
SOCIAL SERVICES
RESERVE FUND
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
QUALITY OF EDUCATION
MARGINAL COSTS
MARKET PRICES
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
MACROECONOMIC MODEL
ACCOUNTABILITY FRAMEWORK
NET PRESENT VALUE
PRIMARY DEFICITS
BUDGETARY RESOURCES
SOCIAL RETURNS
SERVICE PROVISION
HEALTH SERVICES
PRIVATE SECTOR
PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
GOVERNMENT SPENDING
FISCAL TARGETS
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PATTERNS
PRICE INDEX
CASH TRANSFERS
MONETARY FUND
BUDGET CLASSIFICATION
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
PUBLIC SERVANTS
EXPENDITURE ALLOCATIONS
MANAGERIAL EFFICIENCY
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE
SAVINGS
PUBLIC SPENDING
BENEFICIARIES
DUAL BUDGETING
BUDGETARY CLASSIFICATION
PUBLIC SERVICE
BUDGET DECISIONS
PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROGRAMS
BUDGETARY SYSTEM
EXPENDITURE ENVELOPE
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
MEASURED PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
LOCAL CURRENCY
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
PUBLIC FINANCES
BUDGET PREPARATION
ANNUAL BUDGET
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
EXPENDITURE LEVELS
SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE
GOVERNMENT REVENUE
EXPENDITURE RESPONSIBILITY
FISCAL STANCE
AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE
CAPITAL SPENDING
EDUCATION SYSTEM
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
DECISION-MAKING
MACROECONOMIC STABILITY
FISCAL POLICY
CIVIL SERVICE
FISCAL CONSTRAINTS
BUDGET REFORM
ABSENTEEISM
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
QUALITY OF PUBLIC SPENDING
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
FISCAL SURPLUS
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
CENTRAL AUTHORITIES
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
FISCAL DISCIPLINE
PROVISIONS
HEALTH SECTOR
PUBLIC
ROADS
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
ANNUAL BUDGET CYCLE
ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK
QUALITY OF LIFE
UNIVERSAL ACCESS
FISCAL POSITION
BUDGET EXPENDITURE
SPENDING DEMANDS
CONSUMER PRICE INDEX
EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC SPENDING
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE
AGGREGATE FISCAL DISCIPLINE
QUALITY OF SERVICES
BASIC EDUCATION
CIVIL SERVANTS
ELECTRICITY
CAPITAL EXPENSES
AGGREGATE FISCAL
OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURES
GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES
OIL PRICES
EXPENDITURE LEVEL
OIL RESERVE
ROAD MAINTENANCE
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
ACCOUNTABILITY
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
PUBLIC INTEREST
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
ANNUAL BUDGETING
SANITATION
REAL GROWTH
USER CHARGES
FISCAL ACCOUNTS
EXPENDITURE PLANS
DOMESTIC INVESTMENT
MARKET FAILURES
EXPENDITURE ENVELOPES
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
INVESTMENT ACCORDING
BUDGET SYSTEM
EXPENDITURE PLANNING
MACROECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
POLICY DECISIONS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
POVERTY LEVEL
HEALTH CARE
CAPITAL BUDGET
REFORM PROGRAM
CAPACITY-BUILDING
NATIONAL PLANNING
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
CENTRAL BANK
CAPACITY BUILDING
AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE CEILING
SECTORAL POLICIES
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
SECTORAL POLICY
FINANCIAL STATISTICS
EXPENDITURE GROWTH
SECTORAL CEILINGS
MINISTRIES OF FINANCE
DECENTRALIZATION
FISCAL BALANCE
FINANCE MINISTRY
ACCOUNTING
EXCHANGE RATE
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM
SECTORAL ALLOCATION
TRANSPARENCY
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
HOUSING
BUDGET UNIFICATION
BUDGETING PROCESS
PUBLIC SECTOR
BUDGET CONSTRAINT
SOCIAL POLICIES
CENTRAL AUTHORITY
NATIONAL INCOME
ECONOMIC GROWTH
PUBLIC SERVICES
CIVIL SERVICE REFORM
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/13257Abstract
Libya's 2008-12 development programs is the biggest and most ambitious Public Investment Program (PIP) ever. Public expenditure has also been pro-poor. Past outcomes show that Libyan authorities have worked on their macroeconomic and social fundamentals, so as to have a solid base to sustain its steady progress toward building a market-based economy and reintegrating into the world economy. Making optimal use of a sizable public expenditure, and especially public investment, is an essential component of achieving this strategy. The reports built upon the framework of fiscal management in oil-dependent economies, which features three parts. The first deals with collecting and saving oil revenues, leading to one stream of a large literature exploring both fiscal sustainability and the pros and cons of alternative models of an oil stabilization fund. The second deals with development spending, leading to a second stream of a large literature assessing standards in public investment and the many effects of sizable public investment programs. The third deals with financing current spending, such as wages, subsidies, or social programs, addressing the ongoing civil service reform and the Wealth Distribution Program (WDP).Date
2009-09-30Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/13257http://hdl.handle.net/10986/13257
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Ethiopia : Public Finance Review 2010World Bank (Washington, DC, 2010-08)Ethiopia Public Finance Review (PFR) is an analytical input to the regular Government-Donor dialogue on public finance and aid effectiveness. It forms the basis for policy focused analyses and sustained dialogue that facilitate close partnership and enhanced mutual accountability between Government and the development partners. The PFR is also an important instrument for determining the level and quality of aid and it fulfills a due diligence requirement for operations like the Protection of Basic Services. The 2010 PFR analyzes the effectiveness of decentralized service delivery in Ethiopia. While the Government of Ethiopia (GoE) has pursued decentralization for the last two decades, neither a comprehensive documentation of the functioning of the system nor a thorough evaluation of its effectiveness is available. This study attempts to fill this gap by linking policy and institutional variables related to decentralization with service delivery outcomes at the sub-national level.
-
Common Practices in Setting Expenditure Ceilings within National BudgetsWatkins, Joanna; Dorotinsky, William (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016-11-29)Developing a national budget has always
 entailed a complex set of negotiations between national
 Government priorities, line ministry priorities, and a
 national funding envelope. This note explains how to
 introduce a medium term horizon into a government’s
 budgeting process, including the key steps involved. It
 provides guidance on setting aggregate and line ministry
 ceilings, reviewing experiences from countries with
 extensive experience of ceilings (for example, Finland, the
 Netherlands, Sweden, South Korea, Indonesia, Brazil,
 Australia, and Canada, among others), as well as those that
 have more recently adopted them. There is no one right way
 to set expenditure ceilings. Countries tailor expenditure
 ceilings to meet their specific needs, budget challenges,
 and capacity constraints. This note presents an iterative
 approach - starting from annual ceilings and gradually
 moving toward a medium-term expenditure framework - allowing
 for procedural, institutional, and organizational learning
 and adaptation along the way.
-
Financing Public Infrastructure in Sub-Saharan AfricaFoster, Viven; Smits, Karlis; Briceño-Garmendia, Cecilia (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2017-09-08)To be credible, any plan for scaling up
 infrastructure in Africa must rest on a thorough evaluation
 of how fiscal resources are allocated and financed. Because
 in every plausible scenario the public sector retains the
 lion's share of infrastructure financing, with private
 participation remaining limited, a central purpose of such
 an evaluation is to identify where and how fiscal resources
 can be better used if not increased without jeopardizing
 macroeconomic and fiscal stability. The stakes are high,
 because the magnitude of Africa's infrastructure needs
 carries a commensurate potential for misuse of scarce fiscal
 resources. The authors analyze recent public expenditure
 patterns to identify ways to make more fiscal resources
 available for infrastructure. The authors do this in three
 ways. First, we quantify the level and composition of public
 spending on infrastructure so as to match fiscal allocations
 to the particular characteristics of individual subsectors
 and to countries' macroeconomic type (low-income
 fragile, low-income no fragile, oil-exporting, and
 middle-income). Second, the authors evaluate public
 budgetary spending for infrastructure against macroeconomic
 conditions to get a sense of the scope for making additional
 fiscal resources available based on actual allocation
 decisions in recent years. And, third, the authors look for
 ways to make public spending for infrastructure more
 efficient, so as to better use existing resources. Any
 exercise of this kind encounters data limitations. First,
 because it was not feasible to visit all sub national
 entities, some decentralized infrastructure expenditures
 probably have been underrepresented, with particular
 implications for the water sector. Second, it was not always
 possible to fully identify which items of the budget are
 financed by donors, and contributions by nongovernmental
 organizations (NGOs) to rural infrastructure projects are
 likely to have been missed completely. Third, it was not
 always possible to obtain full financial statements for all
 of the infrastructure special funds that the authors
 identified. Fourth, accurate recording of annual changes in
 fixed capital formation (capital expenditure) of State-owned
 enterprises (SOEs) remains a methodological challenge.
 Fifth, accurate measurement of existing public
 infrastructure stock will require further methodological development.