Independent Evaluation of IFC's Development Results 2007 : Lessons and Implications from 10 Years of Experience
Author(s)
Independent Evalaution GroupKeywords
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYPRODUCTIVE INVESTMENT
FINANCIAL SECTOR
COUNTRY RISKS
TRADE FINANCING
RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
LOAN
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
EQUITY INVESTMENTS
PORTFOLIOS
INVESTMENT DECISIONS
SUBSIDIARY
ACCOUNTABILITY
INVESTMENT PROJECTS
SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
PRIVATE INVESTMENTS
DOMESTIC CAPITAL
BOUNDARIES
PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE
PRIVATE CAPITAL
RECONSTRUCTION
CHECKS
FINANCES
ROADS
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
LIQUIDITY
FUTURES
CRISES
PROFITABILITY
CAPITAL MARKETS
RETURNS
DEMONSTRATION EFFECTS
FLAG
EMBARGO
TRANSPORT
DEVELOPING COUNTRY
RETAINED EARNINGS
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
INSTRUMENT
FINANCIAL MARKET
INVESTMENT CLIMATES
MATURITY
LIENS
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
CAPITAL FLOWS
GDP
MEETING
INFLATION
PROJECT APPRAISAL
DEPOSIT
MARKET RISK
HUMAN CAPITAL
MEETINGS
MANDATES
PRIVATE INVESTMENT
SETTLEMENT
BANK BRANCHES
INFLATION RATE
LOCAL CURRENCY
FINANCIAL SYSTEM
INTERNATIONAL FINANCE
INVESTMENT RATINGS
RURAL FINANCE
CAPITAL MARKETS DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIAL MARKETS
PRIVATIZATION
IFC
CORPORATE TAX RATE
SCARCE CAPITAL
DOMESTIC FINANCIAL MARKETS
DURABLES
DEBT
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
INCOME
BANKING SECTOR
RATING SYSTEMS
EQUITY INVESTMENT
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
COMPETITIVE MARKETS
PORTFOLIO
FINANCIAL RISK
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
TAX
IBRD
DECENTRALIZATION
INTERNATIONAL MARKETS
FRONTIER
INVESTING
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
DOMESTIC CAPITAL MARKETS
INVESTMENT CLIMATE
BANK POLICY
FINANCIAL CRISES
FIXED CAPITAL
INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
DUE DILIGENCE
DECISION MAKING
DURABLE
CONFLICT
GROSS FIXED CAPITAL FORMATION
NATURAL RESOURCES
PEER REVIEW
EMERGING MARKETS
FOREIGN CURRENCY
MICROFINANCE
INTERNATIONAL BANK
RISK FACTORS
RETURN
DEVALUATION
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6898Abstract
IFC's overriding objective is to help reduce poverty and support sustainable development in developing countries. This report, which assesses the impact of IFC toward that mission, appears at a time of unprecedented levels of private investment in the emerging markets. The report takes a look back at the development results that IFC-supported projects have achieved in the last 10 years, the main lessons that have emerged at the project level and the strategic implications for IFC going forward, in the context of rapid organizational growth. The report finds that IFC-supported project performance is closely linked to the quality of a country's business climate, the presence of a high quality sponsor, well-managed company and product market risk, and in particular, to IFC's work quality (especially at the appraisal and structuring stage, and including oversight of the environmental and social effects of projects). Going forward, the report highlights major challenges IFC faces to achieving overall development effectiveness. IFC will need to adopt a sharper country focus and better exploit synergies with the Bank and other development partners in improving business climates in developing countries.Date
2008Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/6898978-0-8213-7264-7
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6898
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Sovereign Wealth Funds and Long-Term Development Finance : Risks and OpportunitiesTordo, Silvana; Arfaa, Noora; Halland, Havard; Gelb, Alan; Smith, Gregory (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-02)Sovereign wealth funds represent a large
 and growing pool of savings. An increasing number of these
 funds are owned by natural resource exporting countries and
 have a variety of objectives, including intergenerational
 equity and macroeconomic stabilization. Traditionally, these
 funds have invested in external assets, especially
 securities traded in major markets. But the persistent
 infrastructure financing gap in developing countries has
 motivated some governments to encourage their sovereign
 wealth funds to invest domestically. This paper proposes
 some basic elements of a conceptual framework to create a
 system of checks and balances to help ensure that the
 sovereign wealth funds do not undermine macroeconomic
 management or become a vehicle for politically driven
 "investments." First, the risks and opportunities
 of domestic investment by sovereign wealth funds are
 analyzed. Central issues are the relationship of sovereign
 wealth fund financing to the budget process and to the
 procurement systems of sector ministries, as well as the
 establishment of appropriate benchmarks and safeguards to
 ensure the integrity of investment decisions. The paper
 argues that a well-governed sovereign wealth fund, with a
 sound mandate and professional management and staffing, can
 possibly improve the quality of the public investment
 program. But its mandate should not duplicate that of other
 government institutions with investment mandates, such as
 the budget, the national development bank, the investment
 authority, and state-owned enterprises. Establishing rules
 on the type of investment (for example, commercial and/or
 quasi-commercial) and its modalities (for example, no
 controlling stakes, leveraging private investment) is one
 way to ensure separation between the activities of the
 sovereign wealth fund and those of other institutions. The
 critical issue remains that of limiting the sovereign wealth
 fund's investment scope to that appropriate for a
 wealth fund. If investments that generate quasi-market
 returns are permitted, the size of the home bias should be
 clearly stipulated and these investments should be reported separately.
-
Private Equity and Venture Capital in SMEs in Developing Countries : The Role for Technical AssistanceShariff, Masood; McGinnis, Patrick J.; Divakaran, Shanthi (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2014-04-10)This paper discusses the constraints for
 private equity financing of small and medium enterprises in
 developing economies. In addition to capital, private
 equity investors bring knowledge and expertise to the
 companies in which they invest. Through active participation
 on the board of directors or in partnership with management,
 private equity investors equip companies with critical
 improvements in governance, financial accounting, access to
 markets, technology, and other drivers of business success.
 Although private equity investors could help to create,
 deepen, and expand growth of small and medium enterprises in
 developing economies, the vast majority of private equity in
 such markets targets larger or more established enterprises.
 Technical assistance, when partnered with private equity,
 can unlock more investor commitments and considerably
 enhance the ability of small and medium enterprises in
 emerging markets to raise private equity capital. Technical
 assistance provides funding that allows private equity funds
 to extend their reach to smaller companies. Technical
 assistance can mitigate some level of risk and increase the
 probability of successful investments by funding targeted
 operational improvements of investee companies. Dedicated
 technical assistance facilities financed by third parties,
 such as development finance institutions, governments, or
 other parties, have emerged to fill this critical need. The
 paper discusses the provision of investment capital twinned
 with technical assistance, which is now more accepted by
 limited partners and general partners or fund managers and
 is becoming more of a market model for private equity
 finance focused on small and medium enterprises.
-
Attracting Foreign Direct Investment : What Can South Asia's Lack of Success Teach Other Developing Countries?Tan, Congyan; Sadeghi Emamgholi, Amir S.; Gould, David M. (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-11)Like many other developing countries,
 South Asian nations have been experiencing increased foreign
 direct investment inflows over the past decade as developing
 countries get a larger share of cross-border investments
 that were once sent to developed countries. Nonetheless,
 South Asia's inflows of foreign direct investment
 remain the lowest relative to gross domestic product among
 developing country regions. Why are South Asia's
 foreign direct investment inflows so low and what lessons
 can be drawn for developing countries as a whole? The
 analysis in this paper uses a novel empirical model that
 accounts for possible trends in convergence in the ratio of
 foreign direct investment to gross domestic product between
 countries and cross-sectional data for 78 countries from
 2000 to 2011. The sample contains 52 developing countries.
 The analysis finds that two key factors are at work -- high
 overall regulatory restrictions on foreign direct investment
 and specific restrictions placed on doing business with
 other countries. These factors include overall trade
 restrictiveness, which reduces the benefits to cross-border
 investments, and weak institutions to protect foreign
 investors and facilitate investment. Nonetheless, the
 potential for faster growth in intra- and inter-regional
 foreign direct investment flows is significant. The main
 factors leading to this conclusion are South Asia's
 current low levels of foreign direct investment, the many
 unexploited opportunities for embodied knowledge transfer,
 and supply-chain linkages. The overall lessons for
 developing countries are that liberalizing policy
 constraints in both trade and foreign investment, keeping
 corporate tax rates modest, and improving governance and
 transparency could help to substantially improve foreign
 direct investment flows.