Keywords
BUDGET MANAGEMENTSECTOR POLICIES
INITIATIVE
TRANSPORT SERVICE
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM DESIGN
REHABILITATION
RAIL NETWORKS
PRICE DIFFERENTIALS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
GOVERNMENT EFFECTIVENESS
MEASURABLE RESULTS
ROAD TYPE
ROAD USERS
EXPENDITURE
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
POLITICAL PARTIES
JUSTICE
NATIONAL STATISTICS
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
BIDDING
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
POLITICIANS
PROGRAMS
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
PERSONAL GAIN
AIR
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
POLITICAL INTERFERENCE
LEADERSHIP
TRANSPORT PROJECTS
ROAD FUND
CORRUPTION
CITIZENS
RULE OF LAW
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
ABUSE OF POWER
TRANSPORT PROVISION
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE
UNREALISTIC BUDGETS
DRIVING
AMBITION
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT
TRANSPARENCY
DECISION MAKERS
TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
GOVERNANCE DIMENSIONS
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
TRUCKS
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
AUDITOR
COMPOSITE INDICATORS
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
PRIVATE SECTOR CONCESSIONS
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
TRANSPORT COSTS
PENALTY
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
SECTOR POLICY
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
PRICE FIXING
INVESTIGATORS
CAPACITY BUILDING
MONETARY UNION
POLICY CYCLE
HUMAN RIGHTS
PRIVATE SECTOR
POOR PERFORMANCE
ANTI-CORRUPTION
POVERTY REDUCTION
COMPOSITE INDICATOR
CONSENSUS
ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS
MEDIA
DECISION MAKING
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
URBAN TRANSPORT
ABUSE
COMPLAINTS
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
POLICY FORMULATION
RECURRENT EXPENDITURE
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS
ROAD DESIGN
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
GOVERNANCE ENVIRONMENT
DEMOCRATIZATION
INVESTIGATION
TRANSPORT PLANNING
GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES
PROGRAM MANAGER
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
ACCOUNTABILITY
INTEGRITY
DISCRETION
ROAD NETWORK
TRANSPORT STRATEGY
REGULATORY AUTHORITY
AUDITOR GENERAL
LOBBYING
ANNUAL BUDGET
PUBLIC SECTOR
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY
GOVERNANCE COMPONENT
RAILWAYS
SERVICE DELIVERY
ROAD
ANTICORRUPTION
SANCTIONS
VEHICLE
SECTOR PROGRAMS
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
LOCAL INSTITUTIONS
GENERAL BUDGET SUPPORT
BUDGET INFORMATION
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
TRANSPORT SECTOR
COMPOSITE MEASURES
PATRONAGE
IMPROVING GOVERNANCE
NATIONAL PRIORITIES
INFRASTRUCTURE SECTOR
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE
CIVIL SOCIETY
TRANSPORT SERVICES
LEGISLATION
REPRESENTATIVES
ROAD USE
TRANSPORT POLICY
GOVERNANCE INDICATOR
DATA AVAILABILITY
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
AID EFFECTIVENESS
RISK MANAGEMENT
ROAD TRAFFIC
GOVERNANCE MONITORING
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
CORRUPT
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
CONFIDENCE
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
BUDGET DISCIPLINE
FINANCE MINISTRY
RURAL ROADS
HIGHWAY
ROAD FUNDS
ROAD MANAGEMENT
COLLUSIVE PRACTICES
GOVERNANCE PERFORMANCE
ROAD TRANSPORT
FUEL
ASSETS
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
ACCOUNTING
PUBLIC FINANCE
ROAD DEVELOPMENT
RAIL
ROUTE
TRANSPORT
WORLDWIDE GOVERNANCE INDICATORS
NATIONS
SECTOR BUDGET
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTABILITY
POLITICAL ECONOMY
ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY
ECONOMIC GROWTH
ROAD MAINTENANCE
BRIBE
MEMBER COUNTRIES
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
GOVERNANCE INDICATORS
DECENTRALIZATION
ANTICORRUPTION EFFORT
AUDITORS
MARITIME TRANSPORT
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM
DEMAND FOR TRANSPORT
MONOPOLY
ROAD CONSTRUCTION
GOVERNMENT POLICY
LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
CONSPIRACY
ROAD USER
ROADS
POOR GOVERNANCE
MEASURING GOVERNANCE
PUBLIC MONEY
NATIONAL LEVEL
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
CAPITAL BUDGET
ROAD SECTOR
DATA COLLECTION
PUBLIC SECTOR GOVERNANCE
GOOD GOVERNANCE
TRUE
DISCLOSURE
HIGHWAY DESIGN
FINANCE MANAGEMENT
GOVERNANCE ISSUES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16556Abstract
Good governance-or the absence of it-has concerned policy makers and other stakeholders in the transport sector for decades. Most stakeholders recognize that effective governance is crucial if improvements in transport infrastructure are to endure and contribute to sustainable economic growth. In Africa, billions of dollars have been spent on improving and rehabilitating transport infrastructure, but it has been long recognized that the poor performance of the transport sector is due to far more than merely inadequate finance or technical capacity constraints. Poor governance occurs at many levels of the policy cycle-from the ways in which legislation is drafted and regulations, systems, and procedures are worded and applied in practice, to how services are eventually delivered to the users of transport and whether their expectations are met. This paper sets out to identify a critical subset of governance indicators in the transport sector that can be used to demonstrate in a clear, measurable way the quality of governance in a particular country, sector, or subsector. By means of consultation with key transport sector stakeholders, it examines transport sector governance issues in four pilot countries in order to determine whether there is a consensus on what transport sector governance means in practice; why it matters; how it can be measured; and in what priority ways improvements in governance might make a real difference in the sector and its contribution to national development. At its core, the study attempts to reduce the indicator set to what is at the heart of the governance matter.Date
2014-01-09Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/16556http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16556
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 UnportedRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Spending on Public Infrastructure :
 A Practitioner's GuideBriceno-Garmendia, Cecilia; Sarkodie, Afua (2012-03-19)This paper provides a methodological
 tool to support the collection and preparation of
 standardized, comprehensive data regarding public spending
 on infrastructure services that can be rigorously compared
 across countries. Infrastructure is defined to cover six
 sectors: irrigation, energy (primarily power), transport,
 communication, wastewater management, and water supply. The
 guide is designed to provide a much richer and more complete
 measurement of infrastructure spending than the limited
 highly aggregated data currently available through the IMF
 Government Financial Statistics. Originally developed for
 Africa, the methodology is relevant and readily applicable
 to any developing country. With the aim of being as
 comprehensive as possible, the methodology covers central
 and sub-national government expenditures, non-budgetary
 vehicles (such as road funds), state-owned enterprises
 (SOEs), and public-private partnerships (PPPs). While the
 methodology focuses on collecting quantitative data on the
 level and composition of spending, this is complemented with
 qualitative data that provides the institutional context.
 Importantly, the methodology allows for cross-classification
 of infrastructure spending by purpose (power, roads, etc)
 and by function (operational versus capital spending). This
 guide provides practical guidance -- including concepts,
 definitions, and classifications -- for each of the three
 stages of work, namely: (i) pre-field, (ii) field, and (iii)
 back office.
-
Poverty Reduction Support CreditsHorton, Brendan (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2017-08-17)Mozambique acquired independence from
 Portugal in 1975. The new government adopted a policy of
 radical social change, with a command and control approach
 to economic management and a vast nationalization program.
 By the mid-1980s, the country was bankrupt, and the
 government turned to the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
 and the World Bank to help transform it into a market
 economy. Since the early 1990s, Mozambique's Gross
 Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate has been above 7 percent
 in all but two years and has averaged 7.8 percent. Over the
 same period, inflation has trended broadly downwards from 63
 percent in 1994 to 8 percent in 2007. On the savings and
 investment front, gross investment has averaged 26.4
 percent, while domestic savings has been 8.2 percent, the
 difference being made up for with foreign savings. Fiscal
 policy has generally been well managed, with deficits
 financed by external assistance. The government managed to
 protect the 65 percent of primary expenditures going to
 priority sectors. Public investment declined as a percentage
 of GDP, as did private investment. Revenue collection
 improved. Exports grew from 10.2 percent of GDP in 1991 to
 38 percent in 2006. Over this period, a flexible exchange
 rate policy has been followed. The national poverty rate was
 69.4 percent in 1996-1997 and 54.1 percent in 2003.
 Mozambique obtained considerable fast disbursing assistance
 from the World Bank in the period 1984-2002.
-
Making Education Spending Count for the Children of Autonomous Muslim Region of MindanaoAustralia DFAT; World Bank (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2015)The project builds on support to DepEd
 ARMM through the Australian Aid Basic Education Assistance
 for Mindanao (BEAM) activity, and further initiatives by the
 World Bank and partners. Chapter two of this report proceeds
 with an introduction to ARMM’s development context,
 including the evolution of regional institutions and the
 basic education system. Chapter three describes the unique
 ARMM Public Expenditure Management ‘syndrome’ that
 contributes to the weaknesses analyzed in this report, and
 in turn informs its policy recommendations. Chapter four
 analyzes pub¬lic expenditures for basic education in terms
 of aggregate spending, expenditure composi¬tion, and
 specific challenges that the ARMM PEM syndrome poses for
 budgeting. Chapter five assesses budget execution and
 frontline delivery aspects of basic education resources,
 incorporating findings from the facilities survey. Chapter
 six summarizes the findings on public expenditure management
 for education in ARMM and derives recommendations both for
 reforms to ARMM institutions and for consideration by the
 transition commission and other stakeholders in the
 preparations for a new Bangsamoro political entity.