Keywords
CITIZEN ENGAGEMENTINTERNATIONAL LAW
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
RULE OF LAW
CONSENSUS
PUBLIC SERVICE
ELECTION
CORRUPTION CONTROL
GOVERNMENT RESOURCES
ACCOUNTING
NATIONAL LEVEL
PRIMARY EDUCATION
DECISION MAKING
MINISTERS
GOVERNANCE PROBLEMS
CITIZENS
ANTI-CORRUPTION
PROSECUTIONS
LAWS
YOUTH
BUDGET MONITORING
LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT
CITIZEN EMPOWERMENT
PUBLIC HEARINGS
LOCAL AUTHORITIES
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
MULTI-PARTY DEMOCRACY
SERVICE DELIVERY
LEGAL ACTIONS
ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES
COMPLAINTS
COLLECTIVE ACTION
CITIZEN VOICE
PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES
FREE EXPRESSION
PARTICIPATORY PLANNING
CITIZEN
COMMUNIST
COUNTRY LAWS
GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
ACCOUNTABILITY
INDEPENDENT MEDIA
PUBLIC POLICY
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
POLITICAL STABILITY
DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES
REGULATORY QUALITY
MISAPPROPRIATION
INVESTIGATIONS
MONEY LAUNDERING
TRIALS
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES
LEGAL PROVISIONS
SOCIAL TRUST
LABOR UNIONS
REMEDY
LACK OF AUTONOMY
PUBLIC FUNDS
GOVERNANCE ISSUES
NATIONALISM
POLICE FORCE
LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFERS
CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX
OFFENSE
COMMUNIST PARTY
DEMOCRATIZATION
INITIATIVE
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
LEGITIMACY
DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE
LACK OF CLARITY
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
DISCRIMINATION
POLICY MAKERS
ABUSE
LEGAL FRAMEWORKS
FRAUD
COMMUNITY LEADERS
POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS
KINGS
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
POLITICIANS
CRIMES
DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS
POLITICAL INFLUENCE
REPRESSION
FEDERATIONS
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
POLITICAL PARTY
CORRUPT
STATE POWER
CIVIC ENGAGEMENT
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
BUREAUCRACY
GOVERNANCE INDICATORS
CRIMINAL
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
MONARCHY
DECENTRALIZATION
LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
NATIONAL PLANNING
COMPLAINT
PROSECUTION
PERCEPTIONS INDEX
ABUSES
INTERNATIONAL AID
EXTORTION
INVESTIGATION
INEQUALITY
DECISION-MAKING
INTERNATIONAL LAWS
LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY
DISCLOSURE
ASSET DECLARATION
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
SANCTIONS
ELECTIONS
GOVERNMENT'S BUDGET
BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS
POLITICAL LEADERS
POLITICAL PARTIES
AUDITOR
POLITICAL FORCES
POLITICAL INTERESTS
ADJUDICATION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
SOCIAL WELFARE
DISTRICTS
PARTIES IN POWER
CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM
PATRONAGE
DEMOCRATIC POLITICS
TELEVISION
LOCAL LEVELS
CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS
MUNICIPALITY
HUMAN RIGHTS
GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES
POLITICAL INTERFERENCE
FAIR ELECTIONS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEMOCRATIC REFORMS
LOCAL BODIES
BRIBERY
POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC INFORMATION
GOOD GOVERNANCE
CANDIDATES
INSTITUTIONALIZATION
JUDICIARY
CONSTITUTION
CIVIL SERVANTS
GOVERNMENT EFFECTIVENESS
HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
POLICE
HUMAN RESOURCES
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
LOCAL AUTHORITY
REPRESENTATIVES
AUTHORITY
FINANCIAL AUDITS
DEMOCRACY
POLITICAL CONSENSUS
VIOLENCE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ELECTED OFFICIALS
PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE
ECONOMIC GROWTH
CONSTITUENT
PUBLIC CONTRACTS
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY
PUBLIC SERVICES
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
POLITICAL INSTABILITY
PRIME MINISTER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
CONFIDENCE
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
VOTING
COMBATING CORRUPTION
LOCAL GOVERNANCE
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
GOVERNANCE PROCESSES
POLITICAL POWER
CORRUPTION PREVENTION
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
POLITICAL LEADERSHIP
POLICES
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
INCOME
JUSTICE
POLITICAL ECONOMY
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY
LEGISLATURE
EXPENDITURE
DISSOLUTION OF PARLIAMENT
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
INTEGRITY
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ACT
GANGS
PROSECUTOR
TRANSPARENCY
PUBLIC FINANCES
GOVERNANCE INSTITUTIONS
LOCAL ELECTIONS
ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS
PUBLIC SUPPORT
BUDGET INFORMATION
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17661Abstract
The World Bank has introduced a new Program for Accountability in Nepal (PRAN) to enhance the capacities of civil society and government actors to utilize social accountability approaches and tools. This political economy study seeks to inform the PRAN by identifying the strengths and opportunities as well as risks and obstacles for social accountability initiatives in Nepal. It includes recommendations for managing and addressing these issues. The study is based on primary and secondary research conducted from September 2010 to February 2011. The research methodology utilized for this study was three-fold. First, a literature review was undertaken including in-country laws, policies and regulations, as well as a range of studies and articles on issues of relevance to social accountability in Nepal. A bibliography of these materials is attached as annex one. Second, semi-structured interviews were conducted with key civil society leaders, non-governmental organization (NGO) staff, journalists, academics, government officials, and citizens. A list of people interviewed and guiding questions are attached as annex two. Third, the research team made field visits to the eastern and western regions of the country to observe social accountability initiatives and interview local stakeholders. In total 75 people were interviewed, including 12 civil society leaders. Focus group discussions with citizens were also conducted in Ilam, Dhankuta, Itahari, and Palpa. The first section of the paper provides a brief historical overview of political development in Nepal, and highlights how these historical legacies influence current day citizen-state relations and accountability relationships. Section two analyzes the legislative and institutional framework for social accountability in Nepal. The third section of the paper analyzes a range of contextual factors influencing social accountability in Nepal. Section four identifies citizen information, citizen voice, and collective action as three key elements of social accountability in Nepal, and discusses current strengths and weaknesses with regard to each of them. Section five of the paper looks at each one of the PRAN's three focal areas - public financial management, municipal governance, and community-based monitoring and evaluation of public services. Finally, section six outlines conclusions and recommendations for promoting social accountability in Nepal.Date
2014-04-07Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/17661http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17661
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Local Government Discretion and Accountability : A Local Governance FrameworkWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-12)This economic and sector work (ESW) report presents an analytical framework of local governance through the lens of accountability. It intends to establish a methodological basis for analyzing linkages between decentralization and accountability and is based on desk reviews and interviews. The main objective of this report is to present a coherent and comprehensive approach for decentralizing countries to achieve a high degree of local government discretion accompanied by robust accountability mechanisms. This report, which is a direct response to this growing interest, presents various social accountability mechanisms that could complement public sector accountability approaches. It also highlights the operational challenges the Bank's projects on local governance reform must often confront. Accordingly, the findings of this ESW provide, in one comprehensive framework, guidance on both macro policy-making and implementation of decentralization reforms.
-
Participatory BudgetingShah, Anwar (Washington, DC : World Bank, 2012-05-30)This book provides an overview of the principles underlying participatory budgeting. It analyzes the merits and demerits of participatory budgeting practices around the world with a view to guiding policy makers and practitioners on improving such practices in the interest of inclusive governance. This publication includes five regional surveys, and seven country case studies can be found on the accompanying CD ROM. The study explains that participatory budgeting has been advanced by budget practitioners and academics as an important tool for inclusive and accountable governance and has been implemented in various forms in many developing countries around the globe. It adds that through participatory budgeting, citizens have the opportunity to gain firsthand knowledge of government operations, influence government policies, and hold government to account. However, participatory processes also run the risk of capture by interest groups. Captured processes may continue to promote elitism in government decision making. This book examines the potential and perils of participatory budgeting, as observed from practices around the globe. It is divided into three parts. Part I presents the nuts and bolts of participatory budgeting. Part II surveys experiences with participatory budgeting in various regions of the world. Part III (Vol. 2) is on the CD ROM accompanying this book, and it examines case studies of practices in seven countries.
-
Governance, Fragility, and ConflictAgborsangaya-Fiteu, Ozong (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2017-09-07)This report seeks to inform the
 development of a framework for addressing governance reform
 in fragile and conflict affected environments through are
 view of international experiences. The report analyzes the
 experience both of countries that sustained a transition to
 peace and those that fell back into conflict. Pertinent
 lessons will be drawn selectively from a range of fragile
 and conflict affected countries, including Haiti, Cambodia,
 Bosnia and Herzegovina, Mozambique, Liberia, Timor-Leste,
 Afghanistan, Rwanda, Indonesia, Sierra Leone, and Angola. No
 specific typologies have been adopted or formed in order to
 assess these lessons, because typologies can be limiting and
 experiences can be better assessed based on the specificity
 of each country's context. The first section of the
 report sets out broadly accepted definitions of key terms
 such as governance, state building, and fragility. The
 second section reviews experiences with diverse governance
 dimensions and explores the objectives, opportunities, and
 constraints associated with each.