Keywords
PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIESPOVERTY LINE
EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE
SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION
EXECUTION
GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES
SOCIAL SAFETY
INSTITUTIONALIZATION
SOCIAL SAFETY NET
PENSION
PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE
POLITICAL LEADERS
BENEFIT AMOUNT
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
TRANSPARENT MECHANISMS
JUDICIARY
INSURANCE
CONFLICT
ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY
ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY
INSURANCE PROGRAM
LOCAL POLITICIANS
INTERVENTION
TRANSFER PROGRAM
SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEM
MIDWIFES
GOOD GOVERNANCE
CIVIL SOCIETY
CITIZENS
SOCIAL MARKETING
POLITICAL SUPPORT
PRICE SUBSIDIES
MEMBER STATES
SOCIAL WORKERS
CASH TRANSFER
INCOME LEVELS
SOCIAL IMPACTS
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
WORKFARE
FEE WAIVERS
HEALTH RESEARCH
HOSPITALIZATION
SOCIAL TRANSFER
BENEFICIARIES
SOCIAL WELFARE
SCHOOL ATTENDANCE
HUMAN RESOURCES
INCOME
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
SINGLE PARENTS
SERVICE DELIVERY
RISK OF FRAUD
ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE
ADOLESCENTS
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
PARTICIPATORY PLANNING
NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE
PROTECTION SYSTEMS
GOVERNMENT LEVEL
PUBLIC WORKS
POVERTY REDUCTION
PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY
DECREE
DEMOCRATIC SYSTEMS
VULNERABLE GROUPS
GOVERNMENT LEVELS
PRIMARY SCHOOL
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
HEALTH CLINICS
IMPROVING GOVERNANCE
SOCIAL ASSISTANCE
SCHOOL FEEDING PROGRAMS
HUMAN CAPITAL
HEALTH SERVICES
QUALITY CONTROL
FOOD ASSISTANCE
SERVICE PROVIDER
COMMUNITY HEALTH
FREE HEALTH
PUBLIC HOSPITALS
HEALTH CLINIC
BENEFIT PACKAGE
CASH PAYMENTS
BLOCK GRANTS
HEALTH BENEFITS
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
POOR PERFORMANCE
CORRUPTION
GOVERNANCE DIMENSIONS
CASH BENEFITS
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
EXPENDITURE
GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS
LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
DISTRICTS
DECENTRALIZATION
DECISION-MAKING
INSURANCE SCHEMES
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
SOCIAL PROGRAMS
DISCLOSURE
SSN
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
PUBLIC POLICY
ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS
BENEFICIARY
PARENTAL CARE
TRANSPARENCY
ECONOMIC DOWNTURN
ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
PUBLIC FUNDS
HEALTH FACILITY
CITIZEN
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
INTERNAL ACCOUNTABILITY
NEAR POOR
TARGETING
LOW INCOME COUNTRIES
SOCIAL PROTECTION
POOR
HEALTH FACILITIES
HEALTH FINANCING
REGIONAL INTEGRATION
PATIENTS
PUBLIC SECTOR
POLITICAL ECONOMY
MEANS TEST
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
PROTECTION SYSTEM
AGED
SAFETY NET PROGRAMS
HEALTH INSURANCE
AUTHORITY
DECREES
ECONOMIC CRISIS
WORKERS
SERVICE PROVIDERS
FINANCIAL CRISIS
ECONOMIC STRESS
POLITICAL ECONOMY ENVIRONMENT
HEALTH SERVICE
HEALTH CARD
CONDITIONAL CASH
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY
INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE
INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONSHIPS
CASH GRANT
MEANS TESTING
SOCIAL SERVICES
DISCRIMINATION
SOCIALIZATION
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
SOCIAL SECURITY
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
HOSPITALS
BLOCK GRANT
ANTI-CORRUPTION
GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS
SOCIAL SAFETY NETS
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
WORK PROJECTS
CASH TRANSFERS
SOCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
LOCAL LEVELS
ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS
VOUCHERS
PROGRAM COVERAGE
PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAMS
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY
FINANCIAL CRISES
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
SCHOOL FEEDING
INTERMEDIARIES
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
CLINICS
POLITICIANS
TRANSFER PROGRAMS
ACCOUNTABILITY
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY
RULE OF LAW
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
FOOD DISTRIBUTION
NATIONAL LEVEL
WORKS PROJECTS
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT
GOVERNANCE ENVIRONMENT
REPRESENTATIVES
LEGISLATURE
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
LABOR MARKET
LABOR MARKET POLICIES
PUBLIC RESOURCES
POLITICAL INFLUENCE
EXTERNAL ACCOUNTABILITY
ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET
TARGETING MECHANISMS
WORKS PROJECT
DIAGNOSTIC QUESTIONS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
POSTNATAL CARE
UNIVERSAL HEALTH
VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS
HEALTH CENTERS
SCREENING
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16722Abstract
Several Association of Southeast Asian Nation (ASEAN) member states, in the aftermath of the global financial crisis, are expanding their social safety net programs. In many cases, existing delivery mechanisms for social assistance in the region tend to be basic, in line with the small size of programs. This paper is an analytical framework to systematically consider and include governance aspects in the design and analysis of modern social assistance programs. The underlying conceptual model is simple. Programs face a set of supply-side challenges that have to do with their institutional structure and the ways in which accountability and incentive relationships are shaped. However, both in the region and elsewhere in the world there are a number of experiences with diverse governance tools that countries can draw upon as they think how best to design and implement more sophisticated and comprehensive social safety net programs. Finally, administrative capacity is likely to represent a constraint as governments seek to deliver increasingly complex programs to a growing number of beneficiaries over a wide geographically dispersed area. While large investments in administrative capacity are unlikely, it is possible to think about context appropriate solutions that can contribute to reduce governance risk. This report is the first attempt to systematically apply a governance lens to Social Safety Net (SSN) programs in the region. An analytical framework and diagnostic resource to review governance dimensions of SSN programs in ASEAN, the report intends to document existing efforts and challenges and provide guidance to World Bank staff, donors and policy makers interested in strengthening program administration and mitigating potential governance risks within social assistance programs in the region.Date
2013Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/16722http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16722
Copyright/License
World BankRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Social Protection in Low Income Countries and Fragile Situations : Challenges and Future DirectionsOvadiya, Mirey; Zampaglione, Giuseppe; Das, Maitreyi; Andrews, Colin; Elder, John (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-05-28)Demand for social protection is growing in low income countries and fragile situations. In recent years, the success of social protection (SP) interventions in middle income countries (MICs) like Brazil and Mexico, along with the series of food, fuel, and financial crises, has prompted policymakers in low income countries (LICs) and fragile situations (FSs) to examine the possibility of introducing such programs in their own countries. Flagship programs in countries as diverse as Ethiopia, India, Pakistan, and Rwanda have shown the adaptability of social protection interventions to the LIC context. Yet, despite growing levels of support for these initiatives, many challenges remain. In LICs and FSs, governments are confronted with a nexus of mutually reinforcing deficits that increase the need for SP programs and simultaneously reduce their ability to successfully respond. Governments face hard choices about the type, affordability, and sustainability of SP interventions. The paper reviews how these factors affect SP programs in these countries and identifies ways to address the deficits. It supports the establishment of resilient SP systems to address specific needs and vulnerabilities and to respond flexibly to both slow and sudden onset crises. To achieve this, both innovation and pragmatism are required in three strategic areas: (i) building the basic blocks of SP systems (e.g., targeting, payments, and monitoring and evaluation); (ii) ensuring financial sustainability; and (iii) promoting good governance and transparency. These issues suggest the possibility of a different trajectory in the development of social protection in LICs than in MICs. The implications for World Bank support include the need to focus on increasing knowledge and operational effectiveness of SP programs, fostering institutional links between multiple SP programs, and using community capacity and technological innovations to overcome bottlenecks in operations.
-
Rules, Roles, and Controls : Governance in Social Protection with an Application to Social AssistanceBassett, Lucy; Giannozzi, Sara; Ringold, Dena; Pop, Lucian (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-05-28)The paper develops an operational definition of governance that can be applied to social protection. The 2004 World Development Report (WDR) accountability framework acts as a starting point, defining accountability in terms of a set of principal?agent relationships between policymakers, providers, and citizens. Applying this framework to social protection, the paper looks at three broad areas where the Bank is involved in governance in social protection: rules of the game, including clear criteria for entry and exit of programs; roles and responsibilities, including defining accountability relationships and incentive frameworks across levels of government and institutions involved in social protection; and controls and accountability measures, including the broad set of implementation mechanisms and procedures for ensuring that 'the right benefit gets to the right person at the right time'. The paper applies this framework to social assistance policies and programs, reviews what is currently being done across the Bank in this area, and identifies future opportunities for clients and Bank engagement.
-
Social Protection for a Changing India : Main ReportWorld Bank (World Bank, 2012-03-19)India's surge in growth and rapid
 expansion in public spending in the past decade has created
 new possibilities for its social protection system. The
 growing importance of social protection (SP) is reflected in
 the Government of India (GoI) common minimum program and
 eleventh five year plan which commit to institutionalization
 of programs as legal rights (as in the case of public works,
 through the national rural employment guarantee act),
 continued up-scaling of interventions (e.g., social pensions
 and midday meals), and proposals to expand new types of SP
 interventions to the large unorganized sector (e.g., social
 security). The report draws on existing and new data
 sources,. including analysis of: (i) administrative data;
 (ii) several rounds of the National Sample Survey (NSS)
 data; (iii) a social protection survey (SPS) undertaken for
 this report in 2006 in rural areas of Orissa, Madhya
 Pradesh, and Karnataka; (iv) dedicated surveys on social
 pensions in Karnataka (KSPS) and Rajasthan (RSPS) in 2005
 and 2006 respectively; and (v) a living standards survey
 conducted in Jharkhand in 2005 (JLSS). In addition, the
 report incorporates a rich body of secondary sources on SP
 program performance and impact by national researchers and
 government agencies.