Keywords
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTPREPARATION
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PROPERTY TAXES
VILLAGE
ENGINEER
RESIDENTS ASSOCIATIONS
PUBLIC RESOURCES
PUBLIC
EXTREME POVERTY
BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS
COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATIONS
COMMUNITY ACTION
INTERVENTION
COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES
STAKEHOLDERS
DEMOCRACY
BENEFICIARIES
COALITION GOVERNMENT
INTERVENTIONS
SETTLEMENT
LOCAL AUTHORITIES
PHONE CALLS
ENGAGING CITIZENS
SERVICE PROVIDERS
SERVICE DELIVERY
ELECTIONS
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
CITIZEN EXPECTATIONS
DORMITORIES
PARLIAMENT
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
PUBLIC WORKS
CIVIL SOCIETY REPRESENTATIVES
VOTERS
POLITICAL PROCESSES
GOVERNMENT REFORM
CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT
CONSUMERS
TRANSPARENCY
INCOME
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION
EXHIBITS
GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS
INHABITANTS
CONSENSUS
PARTICIPATORY INITIATIVES
LAWS
BUDGET PROCESS
CITIZEN COMPLAINTS
GENDER
LOCAL PARTICIPATION
CITIZEN GROUPS
CBO
MOBILIZATION
GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION
CIVIC LEADERS
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
FOCUS GROUP
ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
POLITICAL PROCESS
OPENNESS
CONSTITUENCY
PARTICIPATORY APPROACHES
COMMUNITY MEMBERS
LEGISLATION
ACCOUNTABILITY TO COMMUNITIES
CAPACITY BUILDING
ENGINEERS
COMMUNITY GROUPS
SOCIAL AUDITS
ACCESSIBILITY
SERVICE PROVISION
HOTELS
MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT
FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS
CITIZEN MONITORING
DISTRICT GOVERNMENT
ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE
CONSTITUENTS
ACCOUNTABILITY
CITIZEN INPUT
LOCAL LEVEL
CONSULTATIONS
RIGHT TO INFORMATION
GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
SOCIAL SERVICES
SOCIAL AUDIT
PUBLIC AUTHORITIES
COMMUNITIES
COUNCILORS
NATIONAL ELECTIONS
INTERVIEWS
CIVIL SOCIETY
YOUTH
HOSPITALS
BUDGET FORMULATION
ELECTION
CONSULTATION
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
BUDGET CYCLE
COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP
MP
AUDITING
GOOD GOVERNANCE
COUNTY GOVERNMENTS
CONSTITUENCIES
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS
BUDGETARY ALLOCATION
PARTICIPATORY PROCESSES
PARTICIPATORY FOCUS
ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
DEVOLUTION
TRADE UNIONS
CIVIC ENGAGEMENT
HUMAN RIGHTS
USER CHARGES
BEST PRACTICES
LOCAL OFFICIALS
FEMALE
PUBLIC FINANCE
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17556Abstract
Kenya's new Constitution mandates a new era of public participation in government, particularly in the 47 new County Governments. Despite the limited participation in decisions regarding the vast majority of government spending, Kenya has a significant history with direct participation in government, as this has been a feature in several of the government's devolved funds such as the Constituency Development Fund (CDF) and Local Authority Service Delivery Action Plans (LASDAP). The objective of this report is to provide lessons and draw on best practices from previous Kenyan experiences with participation in local government, with a focus on how to effectively implement public participation. The research therefore seeks to prompt dialogue, ideas and action among stakeholders to follow through on the strong mandate provided by the Constitution, both at the national and the county level. The report completes six case studies of direct public participation in local government, where cases were selected for their reputation of strong participation. Two of the case studies looked at the operation of the Local Authority Service Delivery Action Plans (LASDAP), which required citizen participation as part of the decentralized Local Authority Transfer Fund (LATF). Two of the case studies examined citizen engagement in the Constituency Development Fund (CDF) process, through which Members of Parliament spend discretionary funds in their local constituencies. Finally, two case studies looked at how citizens were engaged in overseeing the provision of water services through Water Action Groups (WAGs), consisting of individuals appointed by the water authority to report citizen complaints and monitor responses by the Water Service Providers (WSPs).Date
2014-04-01Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/17556http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17556
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Participation, Decentralization and Human RightsFriis-Hansen, Esbern; Kyed, Helene Maria (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2017-09-11)This report examines the theoretical and
 practical synergies between three intervention models that
 are currently being employed to improve local governance in
 developing countries: 1) democratic decentralization or
 devolution; 2) community participatory approaches, and; 3)
 rights-based approaches. The aim is to identify the
 possibilities and challenges of an 'integrative
 approach' to local governance that combines the
 strengths of each of the three intervention models. It is
 assumed that an integrative approach can help enhance
 efforts to improve the downward accountability of local
 governments, enhance equity in the distribution of services
 and in various citizens' access to influence, and
 increase citizen participation in local governance
 processes. This is supported by a number of empirical cases
 from Africa, Latin America, Asia and Bosnia-Herzegovina,
 which are presented in the report. Each case also highlights
 a number of context-specific challenges to using an
 integrative approach, such as available financial resources,
 national policy environments and local conflicts. The report
 fills this gap by both identifying theoretical synergies and
 by drawing on the few empirical cases that exist.
-
Initiatives Supporting Demand for Good Governance Across World Bank Group Sectors and RegionsChase, Robert S.; Anjum, Anushay (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-10-03)This preliminary stocktaking report on the demand for good governance is an effort of the Demand For Good Governance (DFGG) peer learning network to bring together and highlight the wealth of existing knowledge and practices currently available to support DFGG across the World Bank. This report puts forth a framework with key principles for organizing the complex universe of DFGG efforts across sectors and regions. The paper also identifies entry-points areas of development assistance and illustrates a few good practice examples supporting and strengthening DFFG for the World Bank as it builds its understanding of the areas where the institution can scale-up these activities. This report identifies a wide-range of activities supporting DFGG, however, it is worthwhile to note some challenges in collecting information on these activities. The report provides a more detailed review of the overall findings of DFGG work across the Bank. This paper constitute the following sections: an overview of the key DFGG elements in the organizing framework; entry-points for strengthening demand for good governance with case study examples; summary of key findings of the stocktaking; and finally, some challenges that the World Bank needs to address to mainstream DFGG operationally. The annexes constitutes of the following parts: annex one is a compiled list of notable demand for good governance activities supported by the World Bank identified in the stocktaking exercise and by World Bank Vice President Units; annex two provides a brief description of projects to show how the projects and or elements within the projects support DFGG efforts; annex three provides an overview of broad categories of tools and mechanisms supporting DFGG elements in activities; annex four provides a list of World Bank staff contacted and interviewed in the stocktaking exercise; and annex five provides a list of references reviewed.
-
Decentralization and Local Democracy
 in the World : First Global Report by United Cities and
 Local Governments 2008World Bank; United Cities and Local Government (Washington, DC: United Cities and Local Government and the World Bank, 2009)This overall picture of decentralization
 and local democracy in African countries shows significant
 progress at the strictly institutional level. No country now
 publicly opposes the implementation of decentralization
 policies. Local governments exist in all countries, and
 elections are held to elect local authorities. The extent of
 such progress must, however, be set against a number of
 persistent obstacles that continue to hinder a real
 progression of decentralization in Africa. Difficulties
 remain within states concerning the transfer of financial
 resources needed to match the devolved responsibilities.
 Local governments also face difficulties in increasing their
 own resources (aside from state-transfers and grants) at a
 faster pace. Ensuring the availability of qualified human
 resources at the local level and improving public access to
 local services are also fundamental issues of concern.