The World Bank Group and Public Procurement--An Independent Evaluation : Appendixes to Volume 1
Author(s)
Independent Evaluation GroupKeywords
PROCUREMENT CONTRACTTELEPHONE
BANK PROCUREMENT STAFF
BID SECURITY
PROCUREMENT REGULATION
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
CAPACITY BUILDING
RISK MANAGEMENT
PRIVATE SECTOR
BIDDERS
BORROWER
EMPLOYMENT
ECONOMIC COOPERATION
RISK TAKING
OPEN COMPETITION
COMMERCIAL LAW
CONTRACT AWARDS
INNOVATION
DISBURSEMENTS
PROCUREMENT METHODS
PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS
REGULATORY REFORM
RESULT
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
NATIONAL PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS
PROCUREMENT SYSTEM
SERVICES TO CLIENTS
GOOD PROCUREMENT
PROCUREMENT TRAINING
LOAN
CONTRACT EXECUTION
PROCUREMENT [ ] [ ] [ CAPACITY
OPERATIONAL RISK
PROCUREMENT PROCESS
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
PROCUREMENT POLICY
TECHNICAL [ ] [ ] [ ASSISTANCE
INVESTIGATIONS
USES
SINGLE SOURCE SELECTION
PROCUREMENT RULES
LAWS
FRAMEWORK AGREEMENTS
NEGOTIATION
PROCUREMENT ACTIONS
PROCUREMENT PLANNING
COMPLEX PROJECTS
PROCUREMENT REGULATIONS
PROCUREMENT PROCESSES
COUNTRY PROCUREMENT ASSESSMENT
PROCUREMENT SPECIALIST
ACTION PLAN
CONTRACTORS
INTEGRITY OF BANK LENDING
PUBLIC
DISBURSEMENT
RESULTS
TRANSPORT
FIXED BUDGET
ICT
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
PROCUREMENT GUIDELINES
COMPLAINTS
PROCUREMENT REFORM
ACCOUNTING
SUPPLIERS
INTEGRITY
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT OFFICIALS
DEVELOPMENT OF PROCUREMENT
PROCUREMENT PLAN
MANDATE
STANDARD DOCUMENTS
BIDDER
PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS
PROCUREMENT CAPACITY
BEST PRACTICE
FINANCE CORPORATION
CAPABILITY
PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES
PROCUREMENT TRANSACTIONS
JUDGMENT
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
PROCUREMENT [ ] [ ] CAPACITY
PROCEDURES FOR PROCUREMENT
STANDARD BIDDING
BANK PROCUREMENT
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
AUTHENTICATION
NATIONAL PROCUREMENT
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
STANDARD BIDDING DOCUMENTS
PROCUREMENT FUNCTIONS
PROCUREMENT THRESHOLDS
AWARD OF CONTRACTS
PROCUREMENT PRACTICES
BIDS
CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
ACCOUNTABILITY
ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT
INSTITUTION
TRUST FUNDS
PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP
COLLATERAL
INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVE BIDDING
FAIR COMPETITION
GOVERNMENT ENTITY
CERTIFICATION
DECENTRALIZATION
HARMONIZATION
AUDITS
CONTRACT AWARD
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
PROCUREMENT PROFESSIONALS
COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES
PROCUREMENT KNOWLEDGE
PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
HUMAN CAPACITY
INTERNATIONAL FINANCE
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
HUMAN [ ] [ ] [ CAPACITY
TARGETS
CONTACT INFORMATION
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS
POWERS OF ATTORNEY
COUNTRY PROCUREMENT ASSESSMENT REPORT
SUPERVISION
PROCUREMENT DECISION
LAWYER
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
TITLE
CORRUPTION
CIVIL WORKS
JUSTICE
PROCUREMENT LAW
PROCUREMENT ISSUES
PROCUREMENT SPECIALISTS
COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
E-PROCUREMENT
PROCUREMENT REVIEW
FRAUD
BANK FINANCING
LEGAL REFORM
TRANSPARENCY
EPROCUREMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY
HUMAN RESOURCES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16675Abstract
Good public procurement practices are a major determinant of the effectiveness of public expenditure. On behalf of their citizens, governments typically spend as much as 5-20 percent of their gross domestic product on procurement of goods and services, and effective procurement policies enable better use of government budgets. Good national procurement practices are therefore an essential element of the poverty reduction focus of the Bank. Good procurement in Bank projects is also associated with better development outcomes. Equally, sound public procurement in client countries is a prerequisite for the success of the Bank's newly introduced program for results lending instrument. The Bank seeks to ensure that its funds are used for the purpose intended and that they support development effectively and efficiently. Thus, the twin issues that underpin this Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) evaluation are first, how effectively has the World Bank helped build well-functioning public procurement systems in client countries and second, how well have Bank procurement policies and procedures for its investment lending supported the development effectiveness of Bank lending? The evaluation parallels an intensive review by Bank management of the institution's procurement function, motivated by the need to respond to a range of internal and external changes in the Bank's procurement environment. Several evaluations point to the value of coordination between procurement and public expenditure reforms, but also to the difficulties of realizing such coordination. Finally, there are queries related to the adaptability of current Bank procurement guidelines to new contexts, such as public-private partnerships (PPPs); technology loans; and small, fragile, or conflict-affected states. These questions have also contributed to the evaluation's design and coverage.Date
2014Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/16675http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16675
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Republic of South Sudan : Country Integrated Fiduciary Assessment Southern Sudan, Volume 3. South Sudan Procurement Assessment ReportWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-10-03)The purpose of this Country Integrated
 Fiduciary Assessment (CIFA) is: (i) to assess the quality of
 public finance management and procurement systems in South
 Sudan; and (ii) to then determine the extent of fiduciary
 risk posed to domestic and external tax payers by the
 government's use of their funds through these systems.
 South Sudan has great potential for further increases in
 living standards, but achieving them will require large
 improvements in public services, both in access and in
 quality. In turn, Public Finance Management (PFM) and
 procurement systems need to be strengthened in order to
 improve public services; this will require linking spending
 more tightly to policy objectives and strengthening the
 operational efficiency of expenditures. In sum, strengthened
 PFM and procurement systems are not an end in themselves
 but, rather, the necessary means to achieving the ultimate
 objective: improved service delivery in South Sudan. This
 CIFA will be used by the Government of the Republic of South
 Sudan (GRSS) and by the country state governments to inform
 their design or reforms of PFM and procurement systems and,
 in the case of development partners, to inform their design
 or revision of technical and financial assistance programs
 and projects in support of the reforms.
-
Republic of Armenia : Country Procurement Assessment ReportWorld Bank (World Bank, 2009-06-29)This assessment reviews the current status of public procurement in Armenia and makes recommendations for further improvements. It also provides an update of the Country Procurement Assessment Report (CPAR) carried out in May 2004. The report includes an action plan to assist the Government of Armenia (GoA) in moving the procurement reform agenda forward. The assessment was carried out jointly with the counterpart team appointed by the Minister of Finance. The major procurement legislation and other procurement-related laws and decrees, and documents were analyzed and interviews were conducted with procuring entities, suppliers, contractors, consulting firms, civil society, and government officials. The benchmarking report provides a reference point for the GoA to monitor and measure improvements in the public procurement system, and to formulate a capacity development plan to move towards a sound procurement system that leads to economy and efficiency in public expenditure. Donors can use these results to develop strategies for assisting in procurement capacity building and to mitigate risks in their individual operations. In order to further broaden the perspective on the public procurement functions in Armenia and also to focus on certain specific areas of concern, case studies have been carried out on public procurement in health and transport sectors. In light of the GoA interest in introducing Electronic Government Procurement (e-GP), the team has also prepared a special study on the subject, using the readiness assessment guide of the multilateral development banks' e-GP working group. Case studies have also been prepared on anti-corruption measures, and public-private partnership, given the importance of these topics to public procurement.
-
Kyrgyz Republic - Public Procurement System Assessment : Using the OECD-DAC/World Bank MethodologyWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2007-11-10)This procurement assessment provides a basis whereby the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic (GOK) can formulate a capacity-building plan to improve its purchasing system; donors can devise strategies for assisting the capacity development plan and mitigate risks in individual operations that they decide to fund; and the country can monitor system performance and the success of reform initiatives in improving outcomes. It incorporates results from analyses of procurement legislation and feedback from various stakeholders in the procurement system, including government agencies, procuring entities, consultants, contractors, suppliers, and representatives of civil society. The Public Procurement Law (PPL) of the Kyrgyz Republic took effect on May 24, 2004. The PPL provides for a decentralized procurement system. All users of central and local budgetary funds are now responsible for conducting procurement in accordance with the standards of the new law. Since the December 2002 Country Procurement Assessment Report (CPAR), several significant developments have occurred in the public procurement system of the Kyrgyz Republic. In the new PPL, the government implemented the majority of the Bank's recommendations. Although the PPL clearly assigns the procurement oversight and support roles to the State Agency on Public Procurement and Materials Reserve (SAPPMR), the agency is unable to fulfill these roles efficiently and objectively. It lacks adequate capacity. The SAPPMR must review and verify the information contained in tender and contract award notices to ensure that the information is accurate and in compliance with the PPL. The SAPPMR provides little guidance to procuring entities to ensure effective PPL implementation.