Exploitation of Poor Communities in Sierra Leone : False Promises in Reconstruction and Development
Author(s)
Manning, Ryann ElizabethKeywords
DISTRICTSGOVERNMENT OFFICIAL
COMMUNITY LEADERS
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
OFFENSE
HOUSING
INTERVENTION
TEMPORARY SHELTER
SETTLEMENTS
FOCUS GROUP
HUMAN RIGHTS
NGO
LOCAL LANGUAGES
LOCAL AUTHORITIES
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
COMMUNITIES
COLLECTIVE ACTION
BRIBES
COMMUNITY GROUPS
RURAL COMMUNITY
LOCAL AUTHORITY
INVESTIGATION
JAIL
POLICE OFFICER
NATIONAL NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
LOCAL GOVERNANCE
CONTRIBUTIONS
CRIMINAL
CIVIL SOCIETY GROUPS
PUNISHMENT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CORRUPT
YOUTH
ABUSES
CAPACITY BUILDING
CORRUPTION
CIVIL SERVANTS
DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS
CODES OF CONDUCT
SOCIAL CAPITAL
FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS
GOOD GOVERNANCE
INTERNATIONAL NGOS
FRAUD
COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT
COUNTRYSIDE
NEEDS ASSESSMENT
SANCTIONS
SENIOR GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL
VICTIMS
SOCIAL ACTION
VILLAGES
ANTI-CORRUPTION
DEMOCRACY
URBAN AREAS
LAWYERS
INTERVENTIONS
COMPLAINTS
RURAL COMMUNITIES
GRAFT
VILLAGE LEVEL
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
HOUSES
COMMUNITY MEMBERS
CIVIL SOCIETY
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
POLICE
FRAUDS
REMEDIES
CONFIDENCE
TOWNS
PROSECUTORS
CRIMINAL JUSTICE
JUSTICE
HOMES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18021Abstract
Exploitation of poor villagers by fraudulent development practitioners is a startlingly common occurrence in postwar Sierra Leone. Research conducted by the World Bank's justice for the poor and understanding processes of change in local governance project found that virtually every rural community visited by the research team could recount an experience (and often several) in which individuals or organizations promised to deliver development projects and other benefits, collected money from community members under the guise of registration fees or beneficiary contributions, and then disappeared. Some cases may have been legitimate projects that were never realized for one reason or another or the visitors were misunderstood to be making promises that they never intended to make. At the extreme, organizations might exist simply to write proposals and receive funds without ever delivering any benefits, and may need a community presence to do so.Date
2014-04-22Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/18021http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18021
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Analyzing Community Responses to HIV and AIDS : Operational Framework and TypologyWodon, Quentin; N'Jie, N'Della; Rodriguez-García, Rosalía; Bonnel, Réne; Olivier, Jill; Pascual, F. Brian (2012-03-19)This paper presents a framework for analyzing the community response to HIV and AIDS. On the basis of a review of the literature, six criteria are proposed for characterizing such community responses: (1) the types of organizations and structures implementing the response, (2) the types of activities or services implemented and the beneficiaries of these, (3) the actors involved in and driving community responses, (4) the contextual factors that influence community responses, (5) the extent of community involvement in the response, and (6) the extent to which community responses involve wider partnerships and collaboration.
-
Student Leadership Conference Report 2010Santiago, Joseph A; Edmonds, Maxwell; Knoll, Christina (DigitalCommons@URI, 2010-02-17)This is the Student Leadership Conference Attendees Report from the retreat. This is the start of the I AM U-URI Unity in Difference group on campus.
-
Local and Community Driven
 Development : Moving to Scale in Theory and PracticeSpector, Stephen; De Regt, Jacomina P.; Binswanger-Mkhize, Hans P. (World Bank, 2010)Services are failing poor urban and
 rural people in the developing world, and poverty remains
 concentrated in rural areas and urban slums. This state of
 affairs prevails despite prolonged efforts by many
 governments to improve rural and urban services and
 development programs. This book focuses on how communities
 and local governments can be empowered to contribute to
 their own development and, in the process, improve
 infrastructure, governance, services, and economic and
 social development, that is, ultimately, the broad range of
 activities for sustainable poverty reduction. Countries and
 their development partners have been trying to involve
 communities and local governments in their own development
 since the end of Second World War, when the first colonies
 gained independence in South Asia. Pioneers in both India
 and Bangladesh (then a part of Pakistan) developed a clear
 vision of how it will be done: local development should be
 planned and managed by local citizens, their communities,
 and their local governments within a clearly defined
 decentralized framework that devolves real power and
 resources to local governments and communities. Capacity
 support will be provided by technical institutions and
 sectors and nongovernmental institutions.