• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Corruption and Transparency Collection
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Corruption and Transparency Collection
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

Justice Sector Reform in Mongolia : Looking Back, Looking Forward

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Allen, Frances
Gramckow, Heike
Keywords
TRANSPARENCY
JUDGES
LEADERSHIP
ACCESS TO COURTS
JUDICIAL BODIES
ETHICS
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
ANTI-CORRUPTION
COMPENSATION
COURT
INTEGRITY
JUDICIAL REFORM
LAWYERS
COMMON LAW
MEDIA
PROSECUTORS
PROSECUTOR
COURT BUILDINGS
HOUSES
COURT ADMINISTRATION
CORRUPT
PUBLIC INFORMATION
ACCOUNTABILITY
JUDICIAL SECTOR
JUDGE
BRIBES
LAWYER
DEMOCRACY
JUDICIAL SYSTEM
CRIMINAL JUSTICE
COURTS
COURT OPERATIONS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEGAL RESEARCH
JUDICIAL SKILLS
LEGAL TRAINING
RULE OF LAW
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
LEGAL REFORMS
LEGAL EDUCATION
CORRUPTION PERCEPTION
EU
JUDICIAL SYSTEMS
POLICE
JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE
LEGAL INFORMATION
LEGAL PROFESSION
LAWS
COMMERCIAL LAW
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
COURT DECISIONS
CIVIL SERVICE
PROFESSIONALS
EQUALITY
LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
CORRUPTION PERCEPTION INDEX
PROCUREMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
JUDICIAL TRAINING
JUVENILE JUSTICE
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
PROFESSIONAL JUDICIARY
CORRUPTION
JUVENILE OFFENDERS
CASE MANAGEMENT
CIVIL LAW
QUALITY OF JUSTICE
COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS
BRIBE
OFFENDERS
BANKS
CONFIDENCE
LEGAL REFORM
LEGISLATION
CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION
INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT
DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS
CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS
WILL
COURT MANAGEMENT
GOOD GOVERNANCE
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
CIVIL SERVANTS
JUSTICE
COUNSEL
CIVIL SOCIETY
CRIMINAL CASES
LEGAL RIGHTS
PERCEPTION OF CORRUPTION
STATE COURTS
LEGAL AID
JUDICIARY
INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY
EMPOWERMENT
CRIMINAL
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
PROSECUTION
Show allShow less

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/97780
Online Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18323
Abstract
The justice sector in Mongolia has changed significantly in the 20 years since the country became a democracy. From the very beginning, the World Bank and other international partners have provided significant assistance to reform processes, particularly in areas concerned with the development of an independent judiciary. Especially in comparison to other countries in the region, Mongolia's reform efforts have been generally successful. During the early and economically difficult times since democracy was established, reform activities naturally focused on legal reforms, including the creation of a legislative framework for democratic institutions, the transition to a market economy, and for needed changes in the relationship between the state and the people. This was followed at the end of the millennium by concerted efforts to reform justice institutions and to improve human capacities for supporting, implementing and sustaining reforms. Mongolia was the first developing nation to pursue comprehensive and inclusive strategic planning for its justice sector. Its strategic plan has provided a roadmap for reforms over many years and withstood leadership changes in both the government and in the key justice agencies. Much has been achieved, considering the challenges that have been overcome in terms of justice system infrastructure, human capacities and changes in attitudes, all with only very limited budget resources. At the same time, reform gaps exist and public trust in the justice sector is lacking. Critics continue to point to weak and uneven decision making capacities of prosecutors and judges, despite more than a decade of intensive donor support for their training. This paper reviews some of the underlying issues affecting justice reforms in Mongolia; and points to areas that require attention to overcome the current shortcomings and challenges.
Date
2011-01
Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/18323
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18323
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
Collections
Corruption and Transparency Collection
Responsible Leadership Collection
Ethics in Higher Education
Research Ethics Professional

entitlement

 

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Thumbnail

    In Search of Success : Case Studies in Justice Sector Development in Sub-Saharan Africa

    Walsh, Barry (World Bank, 2012-03-19)
    The World Bank, Department for International Development (DFID) and other donors have long been engaged in legal and judicial reform in sub-Saharan Africa in such areas as legal drafting, strengthening court administration, judicial training, and the empowerment of citizens through a better understanding of the legal system. This has often been done on an ad hoc basis with only limited review of other reform efforts in the region. In order to foster a more responsive approach to justice sector development programs, a collection of case studies was commissioned. One of the more daunting tasks was identifying notable justice sector developments or reforms, which offered specific impacts and which could be examined through both a desk review and field research. Independent of the funding source, the evidence base was not only limited but revealed a need for donors themselves to invest in better data collection, which could then be analyzed and measured against benchmarks or objectives such as improved access to justice. There is a significant need to review and learn from experiences, including controversial ones, in Africa's justice sectors. These case studies are not homogenous largely because their subjects vary and span a wide array of developments that reflect the realities of the region. Each story stands alone and is in no particular order. In the final chapter, the conclusions offered in each story are digested into ideas for future actions. The collection also represents a modest range of stories and it is to be hoped that other cases will be identified and shared. A comparison of experiences of sector-wide programs (SWAPs), for example, could help both donors and governments enhance socio-economic impact. It should be noted that the emphasis in this report is on providing information about positive directions in justice sector development and the ways in which lessons learned might be applied to achieve greater impact in the future. The anticipated value of this collection is that some of the conclusions or actions may be taken up and used to contribute to improvements by those committed to improving the rule of law in sub-Saharan Africa and is in search of 'success'.
  • Thumbnail

    Bulgaria - Resourcing the Judiciary for Performance and Accountability : A Judicial Public Expenditure and Institutional Review

    World Bank (Washington, DC, 2008-06)
    This report examines why, given the increasing resources allocated to the judiciary, there seem to have been only modest improvements in judicial performance. It lifts the veil on the conflicting opinions on the reasons for slow progress on performance and efficiency by analyzing the institutional environment within which the judiciary functions and the key incentives propelling the policy stances and actions of major institutional actors. A supply-demand approach is then used to review the challenges behind improving judicial performance, focusing on resource allocation and management issues on the supply side and on case inflow on the demand side. This perspective enables consideration of both supply and demand issues impacting judicial performance and offers an opportunity to suggest actions and policy responses that could enable policy makers to manage demand more effectively while strengthening access to justice. Overall, therefore, improving judicial performance now requires a shift from increasing the overall level of resources to approaches that do not increase the burden on the central budget. The key challenge now confronting Bulgaria's judiciary is to build on the reforms so far by developing, financing and implementing a judiciary-wide modernization program to sustain the transformation and demonstrate impact through monitor able indicators of performance. The information and analysis in this report much of it familiar to the leadership of Bulgaria's judiciary, executive and legislature could facilitate a consensus between the three branches of power on the resources that the judiciary could realistically expect to receive, and on the results that it can be expected to achieve, given existing resource and capacity constraints. In this dialogue, an exclusive focus on judicial independence could risk diverting attention from concrete measures needed to ensure that the judiciary is adequately resourced and that mechanisms to ensure the efficient use of resources and improved performance are in place. Indeed, judicial independence is a fundamental principle guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of Bulgaria, and unconditionally respected with regard to the judiciary's adjudicative functions. However, sustained focus on the achievement of performance goals could have important potential long-term benefits for the judicial system, not only in terms of increased budgetary resources, but more importantly in terms of increased public trust and confidence.
  • Thumbnail

    Improving the Performance of Justice Institutions

    Varela, David F.; Mohlen, Christian; Decker, Klaus (World Bank, Colombia, 2011)
    This paper presents a selection of
 experiences from Organization for Economic Cooperation and
 Development (OECD) countries in managing justice
 institutions which are the most relevant for performance
 improvement of their counterparts in Latin America. The
 scope of the paper is mostly limited to the courts, but
 comprises all types of courts: specialized courts as well as
 courts of general jurisdiction, civil as well as criminal
 and administrative courts, first instance as well as
 appellate and supreme courts. Issues of legal reform,
 judicial training, alternative dispute resolution or access
 for the poor are not considered in this paper. The first
 chapter provides an overview of the justice sector reform
 experience in Latin America over the last two decades, and
 how these reforms coincide with or follow OECD country
 trends. The second chapter outlines the context of the
 debates regarding the performance and quality of justice
 services in OECD countries prior to the 1990s. The third
 chapter discusses the transition from traditional justice
 reform approaches in OECD countries to the New Public
 Management (NPM) approaches that began in the 1990s. The
 fourth chapter presents five major cases of reforms in
 public expenditure, human resources, and organizational
 restructuring in the justice sectors of five different
 countries. The fifth chapter describes recent trends in OECD
 countries regarding quality controls in court service
 delivery which share approaches with the private sector. The
 paper concludes with some suggestions about areas where
 Latin American judiciaries may benefit from experiences of
 OECD countries.
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.