Building Monitoring and Evaluation Capacity in Young Systems : The Experiences of Rwanda, Vietnam, and Yemen
Author(s)
Hwang, HelenaKeywords
LACK OF INFORMATIONPUBLIC EXPENDITURE EFFICIENCY
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGERS
PERFORMANCE REPORTS
BUDGET PROCESS
PROGRAM EVALUATION
PUBLIC SECTOR CAPACITY BUILDING
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE
PROGRAM OUTCOMES
FOOD PRODUCTION
NATIONAL STRATEGY
TRANSPARENCY
POVERTY REDUCTION OBJECTIVES
NATIONAL BANK
ACCOUNTABILITY RELATIONSHIPS
CONFLICT
SOCIAL PROTECTION
BUDGET LAW
OUTCOME INDICATORS
PERFORMANCE TARGETS
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
LACK OF INCENTIVES
BUDGET DECISIONS
MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
GOVERNMENT BUDGET
PROGRAM MANAGER
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
EXPENDITURE DECISIONS
EVALUATION CAPACITY
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
DUAL BUDGETING SYSTEM
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
DECENTRALIZATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS
PROGRAM DESIGN
MEDIUM-TERM OBJECTIVE
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENT
CAPACITY-BUILDING EFFORTS
BUDGET REQUESTS
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
BUDGET ALLOCATION
LEARNING
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
CAPACITY BUILDING
ANNUAL REPORT
PARTICIPATORY PROCESS
SECTOR BUDGETS
BUDGET REVIEW
PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
BUDGET OFFICIALS
IMPACT EVALUATION
POVERTY RATE
DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES
CREDIT POLICY
CENTRAL AUTHORITY
CASH TRANSFER PROGRAM
ANNUAL BUDGETING PROCESS
SECTOR BUDGET
STRATEGIC PLANS
RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS
NATIONAL PRIORITY
WAR
HEALTH INFORMATION
POVERTY RATES
RURAL ELECTRIFICATION
CAPITAL BUDGET
SOCIAL POLICY
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
RURAL
MEASURABLE RESULTS
PROVINCIAL LEVEL
BUDGET EXECUTION
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
BUDGET SUPPORT
PUBLIC FINANCE
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
GOOD GOVERNANCE
PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
FISCAL DATA
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
DATA FOR RESEARCH
FEDERAL BUDGET
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
TARGETING
PERFORMANCE AGREEMENTS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
DECISION-MAKING
POVERTY REDUCTION
BASIC SERVICES
HEALTH SECTOR
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE SYSTEMS
ANNUAL BUDGET
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
DATA COLLECTION
DUAL BUDGETING
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
REGIONAL DIFFERENCES
ANNUAL PLANS
NATIONAL POVERTY
INDEPENDENT MONITORING
NATIONAL STATISTICS
NATIONAL PRIORITIES
CENTRAL AGENCIES
AID EFFECTIVENESS
BUDGET NEGOTIATIONS
ACCOUNTABILITY
CAPACITY-BUILDING
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
NATIONAL POVERTY LINE
STATE BUDGET
BUDGET DEPARTMENT
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGIES
DEBT
DEBT RELIEF
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY PAPER
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
SECTORAL BUDGET
POVERTY LINE
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
PRIVATE SECTOR
EXTREME POVERTY
FLEXIBILITY
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE TRACKING
POOR
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
INFLATION
ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
BUDGET COVERAGE
SERVICE DELIVERY
INCOME
ANNUAL REPORTS
FISCAL FRAMEWORK
TRANSACTION COSTS
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
ACCOUNTABILITY REQUIREMENTS
BUDGET INFORMATION
ACCOUNTABILITY ARRANGEMENTS
PROGRAMS
CENTRAL PLANNING SYSTEM
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
STRATEGIC POLICY
NATIONAL BUDGET
NATIONAL PLANNING
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
HOUSEHOLD LIVING STANDARDS
PUBLIC SECTOR
DONOR FUNDING
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE
POVERTY REDUCTION SUPPORT
BUDGETARY DECISION
POLITICAL ECONOMY
CORRUPTION
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEMS
GENERAL BUDGET SUPPORT
ECONOMIC RECOVERY
CAPACITY LIMITATIONS
WELFARE INDICATORS
BLOCK GRANTS
ANNUAL BUDGETING
SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
DATA QUALITY
NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20023Abstract
This study is funded by the Governance Partnership Facility to better understand country experiences with building monitoring and evaluation (M&E) capacity to identify paths to success and obstacles to reform. For every country, whether recently emerging from conflict, low-income, or Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), M&E is critical to evidence-based policymaking, budget decisions, management, and accountability, all elements of good governance. Building M&E capacity in fragile and conflict-affected states is not a well-documented topic, although analysts generally agree that even in these challenging contexts, countries can set up monitoring capabilities, albeit with heavy donor support. This study aims to strengthen the knowledge base by synthesizing and comparing the experiences of Rwanda, Vietnam, and Yemen in building capacity for their recently established M&E systems. The study also draws comparisons with Mexico's more well-developed M&E system. This paper is directed to policymakers, development workers, donors, and other supporters of M&E research, operations, and activities. The author envision that providing country case studies on implementing M&E programs in difficult circumstances will contribute to a South-South knowledge exchange for key stakeholders who are working to advance newly established M&E systems in their own countries.Date
2014-09-09Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/20023http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20023
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Results, Performance Budgeting and Trust in GovernmentBrumby, Jim; Thomas, Theo; Senderowitsch, Roby; Manning, Nick; Arizti, Pedro; Thomas, Theo; Arizti, Pedro; Senderowitsch, Roby; Manning, Nick; Brumby, Jim (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2017-08-16)The book identifies four categories of
 performance budgeting, namely direct performance budgeting,
 performance informed budget (PIB), opportunistic performance
 budgeting and presentational performance budgeting. While
 the Conference papers often refer to performance budgeting
 broadly defined, much of the book focuses on PIB, the most
 common category of performance budgeting adopted to date,
 making the argument that this is likely to be the most
 applicable in many Latin American countries. The book
 combines two seemingly diverse governance topics, adopts
 contrasting analytic styles to address these, and seeks to
 draw out their inter-connections, with particular reference
 to Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
 (OECD) and Latin American countries. The first topic is PIB,
 which is discussed largely from the practical perspective of
 policy makers and practitioners, reflecting that it is a
 major public administration reform that has been underway
 for several decades. The second topic is the trust of
 citizens and firms in government. This book is divided into
 seven chapters. Chapter one provides an overview of PIB,
 building on two decades of experience and lesson-learning,
 and sets out the key themes that provide the basis for the
 discussions in the subsequent chapters. Chapter two
 introduces the concept of trust in government, particularly
 in OECD and Latin American countries, and explores why this
 matters for development. Chapters three, four, and five
 explore key dimensions of PIB, including the institutional
 foundations, the production of performance information, and
 the uses of performance information. Chapter six considers
 the impact of performance improvement on trust in government
 in OECD and Latin American countries. Chapter seven provides
 a guide for practitioners on PIB.
-
Program Budgeting in Malaysia : Implementing the Outcomes-Based Approach in MalaysiaWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-03-15)This report summarizes the results of a
 two-day fact finding mission and a two day workshop
 conducted by the Economic Planning Unit of the Prime
 Minister s Department in collaboration with the World
 Bank's Public Sector Performance Global Expert Team
 (PSP-GET) held at the beginning of March in 2010 in
 Putrajaya, Malaysia. Prior to the workshop, the team held
 meetings with officials from the EPU, the Ministry of
 Finance, the Ministry of Transport, and the Ministry of
 Health to better understand the coordination and
 implementation challenges facing these entities with regard
 to adopting an outcomes-based approach (for a summary of the
 issues discussed please see Appendix). This report covers
 the critical areas to consider when implementing an
 outcomes-based approach. These include the organization and
 allocation of responsibilities, the design of the
 implementation process, the function of a Monitoring and
 Evaluation (M and E) system, change management, and the
 risks associated with such a transition. Each section is
 then structured in the following way: Issues identified
 during the discussions; relevant experience from the two
 main case study countries (Korea and Australia); and overall
 findings of the PSP-GET team.
-
Improving Public Expenditures in AgricultureAmponsah, Kofi; Annor-Frempong, Charles (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2015-12-15)The objective of the agricultural sector public expenditure review (AgPER) was to examine the
 efficiency and effectiveness of agricultural sector expenditures in Mongolia. The AgPER provides policy makers with a better understanding of: (a) trends in the level and
 composition of public expenditures in agriculture over the past five to ten years; (b) the economic
 and functional composition of agriculture expenditures; (c) the budget processes and performance in
 the agriculture sector; (d) issues inhibiting the effectiveness and efficiency of public expenditures in
 agriculture.