Kingdom of Lesotho Local Governance, Decentralization, and Demand-Driven Service Delivery, Volume 1. Main Report
Author(s)
World BankKeywords
LACK OF AUTONOMYLAWS
LEVIES
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
BRIBERY
LEVY
JUDICIARY
GOVERNMENT LEVEL
HOLDING
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CAPACITY
ACCOUNTING
CITIZENS
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
BROKERS
GLOBALIZATION
DECENTRALIZATION
ACCOUNTABILITY
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
LOCAL AUTHORITIES
CORRUPTION
COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICTS
FINANCIAL SYSTEMS
NATURAL RESOURCES
INCOME
LEGAL OFFICERS
VALUATION
GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES
LEGAL SYSTEM
DEMOCRACY
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
COUNCILS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEGAL CHANGES
DECONCENTRATION
HUMAN RESOURCES
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
MANDATES
CONSTITUENCIES
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES
PUBLIC SECTOR
LEGISLATION
REPRESENTATIVES
LOCAL GOVERNANCE
BUDGETING
ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
SERVICE DELIVERY
MUNICIPAL
JUSTICE
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
DEPOSIT
INEQUALITY
VOTING
PRIMARY EDUCATION
LACK OF CLARITY
POLICE
PUBLIC TRANSPORT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES
INITIATIVE
TRUST FUND
PUBLIC SERVICE
GOVERNMENT REFORM
EXPENDITURE
LOCAL COUNCILS
LEADERSHIP
DECISION MAKERS
GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS
CAPITAL GRANT
PUBLIC SERVICES
LOCAL INSTITUTIONS
NATIONS
GOVERNMENT SERVICES
RETURNS
PURCHASING POWER
PUBLIC FINANCE
GOVERNMENT GRANT
GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES
INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONSHIPS
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
THEFT
INTERNATIONAL MARKETS
LOCAL ACCOUNTABILITY
EMPLOYMENT
FISCAL RESOURCES
LAND USE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
TAX BASE
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
ACCOUNTABILITIES
PUBLIC FINANCES
DEVOLUTION
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
CONSENSUS
PUBLIC HEALTH
GRANT FUNDING
SETTLEMENT
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
POLITICIANS
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
LOCAL AUTHORITY
GOVERNMENT POLICY
TRANSPORT
BENEFICIARIES
CORRUPT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE
AUDITOR
ASSETS
PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE
LAND POLICY
SOCIALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPING COUNTRY
CIVIL SOCIETY
INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS
CAPACITY BUILDING
SOCIAL WELFARE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES
HUMAN RESOURCE
REVENUE SOURCES
CREDIBILITY
REVOLUTION
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
CIVIL SERVANTS
ADJUDICATION
GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
CRIMES
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
MARKET TRANSACTIONS
TURNOVER
GOVERNMENT GRANTS
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
PRODUCTIVITY
YOUTH
LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
DISCRIMINATION
ACCOUNTANT
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
CITIZEN
DECISION MAKING
POST OFFICE
DISBURSEMENTS
BANK ACCOUNT
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL SYSTEM
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS
HEALTH SERVICES
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
FINANCE MANAGEMENT
LOCAL TAXES
LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS
USER CHARGES
REMITTANCES
FINANCIAL STRUCTURES
PRIME MINISTER
PENSION
ASSET MANAGEMENT
CAPITAL GRANT SYSTEM
TAX
CRIMINAL
BENEFICIARY
PUBLIC GOVERNANCE
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
WATER SUPPLY
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT
IMPROVING GOVERNANCE
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION
EXCHANGE RATE
MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT
BANKS
CONSTITUTION
INFORMATION DISSEMINATION
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19247Abstract
After more than 35 years, the elected local government system in Lesotho was reestablished in 2005 through the election of the Local Authorities, i.e. the Community and District Councils (CCs and DCs). Across the political spectrum, the political will to move forward was at its peak. An exemplary campaign to educate the entire population as to the purposes and functioning of the new Local Authorities, and the electoral process preceded the election. The purposes of the new system are the improvement in services and access to government, broad participation of the local population in their own development combined with enhanced accountability to them, and promotion of equitable development in all parts of the country. The establishment of the Local Authorities and their election was received by even the remotest populations with great enthusiasm, and the elected Councilors have taken up their job with energy and commitment. The objectives of this report derive from the general priorities of the Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) of Lesotho which emphasizes pro-poor growth, community empowerment, improved governance and public sector performance. The specific priorities of the PRS have been set as employment creation, food security, and infrastructure development, deepening of democracy, governance, safety and security, access to health services, increasing human resource capacity, managing and conserving the environment, and improving public service delivery. Cross cutting priorities include combating HIV and AIDS, and addressing gender inequalities as well as issues related to children and youth. From among all the possible sectors, agriculture and natural resources were selected because: (i) the local authorities have a mandate for the promotion of economic development and the management of natural resources; (ii) improvements in these areas are necessary for economic development, poverty reduction, and for improving the tax base and revenue generation capacity; and (iii) improvements require collaboration between local authorities, communities, sector institutions, and the private sector, a collaboration in which the Local Authorities sit at the center of the network of co-producers.Date
2014-08-01Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/19247http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19247
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Guinea - Decentralization in Guinea : Strengthening Accountability for Better Service DeliveryWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2012-06-12)The purpose of this report is to present reform options for the implementation of the new code that would strengthen accountability in service delivery. The report is structured as follows: chapter one discusses how decentralization can be an effective tool for improving service delivery and local governance. Chapter two assesses progress in fiscal, administrative and political decentralization, scrutinizes their impact on accountability relationships and makes recommendations to further decentralization, in line the new code. Chapter three analyses current arrangements for service delivery in two sectors (water and education), maps out strengths and weaknesses of existing accountability relationships and makes recommendations, drawing on existing innovative practices in Guinea and/or the region. Chapter four offers recommendations to manage change and maintain the momentum for reform. Chapter five concludes with an outlook.
-
Decentralization, Accountability and Local Services in Sierra Leone : Situation Analysis, Key Challenges and Opportunities for ReformWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-04-15)Following years of civil war that ended
 in 2002, Sierra Leone has pursued a policy of
 decentralization, devolving responsibility for many
 government functions to the Local Council level. The aims of
 this policy include achieving a more equitable and inclusive
 access to public services across the national territory, in
 part to alleviate regional inequities that contributed to
 the civil war. The implementation of the decentralization
 policy has faced many obstacles, however, including the need
 to rebuild local government institutions and capacity after
 30 years of centrally dominated governance; the limited
 devolution of financial resources; and multifaceted
 political economy hurdles. This report, first, analyzes the
 current state of decentralization in Sierra Leone; second,
 identifies the most prominent challenges to continued
 decentralization; and, third, discusses options for the way
 forward. The report draws on qualitative and quantitative
 data collected from both central and local government
 stakeholders, and takes the perspective that
 decentralization and strengthened local governance
 institutions are an effective means to localize development
 and improve the effective and equitable delivery of key
 public services. The study focuses on progress to date and
 standing challenges in four key areas of analysis: fiscal
 decentralization, human resource decentralization, ensuring
 inclusivity and accountability in local governance, and
 ensuring efficiency and responsiveness in service delivery.
-
Local BudgetingShah, Anwar (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2007)This publication, Local Budgeting, provides a comprehensive guide for local administrators who are involved in designing and implementing budgetary institutions and who wish to improve efficiency and equity in service delivery and to strengthen internal and external accountability. It details principles and practices to improve fiscal management. It reviews techniques available in developing countries for forecasting revenues and expenditures, and it examines institutional arrangements for ensuring transparency and fiscal discipline. In addition, it outlines some strategies to deal with corruption in local revenue administration. With respect to budgeting, the volume discusses the decisions that need to be made in determining budget format and layout, including the scope of the budget, the degree of transparency of the legal requirements underlying the budget, and the extent to which the budget will emphasize inputs, outputs, and outcomes. Local Budgeting also discusses the role of the capital budget. It details how performance budgeting can serve as a tool for results-based accountability to citizens. It helps the non-specialist reader learn how to interpret budget documents to discover what the government is doing and how well it is performing its tasks. It highlights approaches to stakeholder inputs in the budget process. Finally, it explores the role of budget execution in ensuring management flexibility while enhancing democratic accountability.