The Government Monitoring and Evaluation System in India : A Work in Progress
Author(s)
Mehrotra, SantoshKeywords
DECISION-MAKINGCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC INTEREST
WELFARE PROGRAM
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
BUDGET DECISION
MULTILATERAL AGENCIES
AUDITING
CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE
EXPENDITURE TRACKING SURVEYS
STATE GOVERNMENT
TOWN
ECONOMIC GROWTH
CENTRAL MINISTRIES
MEDIA
QUALITY OF EVALUATIONS
OUTPUT DATA
FISCAL RELATIONS
M&E SYSTEMS
FEDERAL COUNTRY
TAX COLLECTIONS
PUBLIC FINANCE
IMPACT EVALUATION
TOTAL GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
AUDITOR
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MINISTERS
DECENTRALIZATION
ALLOCATION
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
BENEFICIARIES
FISCAL SYSTEM
SUBNATIONAL
DISCRETION
PERIODIC REVIEW
PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
POLICY FORMULATION
MACROECONOMIC POLICY
PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
FINANCIAL AUDITS
WELFARE PROGRAMS
LEARNING
SERVICE PROVIDER
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
CAPITALS
PROGRAMS
SANCTIONS
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
TAX
OUTCOME BUDGETING
SANCTION
STATE EXPENDITURES
GROWTH RATE
PORTFOLIOS
CORRUPTION
AUDIT SYSTEM
SANITATION
CENTRAL BANK
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
HEALTH POLICY
STATE GOVERNMENTS
SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
CIVIL SERVICE
QUALITY ASSURANCE
INTERVENTIONS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
SECTOR MINISTRIES
FISCAL DEFICIT
PUBLIC GOODS
CASH MANAGEMENT
FISCAL PRUDENCE
DISTRICTS
PRIVATE SECTOR
EXPENDITURE RESPONSIBILITIES
FINANCIAL TRANSFERS
GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES
CENTRAL MINISTRY
PARTICIPATORY METHODS
DISTRICT
EDUCATION PROGRAM
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE
EXPENDITURE OUTCOMES
PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
ALLOCATION OF FUNDS
FRAUD
POLITICIAN
LAWS
PUBLIC SECTOR
AUDITOR GENERAL
TRIAL
FISCAL TRANSFERS
ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS
LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT
SUCCESS INDICATORS
VILLAGE
PROGRAM EVALUATION
MINISTER
HEALTH CENTERS
M&E ACTIVITIES
CIVIL SOCIETY
MINISTRIES OF FINANCE
EVALUATION RESULTS
PUBLIC WORKS
CONCURRENT EVALUATION
THEFT
SOCIAL AUDITS
ACCOUNTING
PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM
ASSETS
PROGRAM MANAGERS
PERFORMANCE BUDGET
SCANDALS
REVENUE-RAISING POWER
CIVIL SERVANTS
AUDITORS
CENTRAL AGENCIES
ACCOUNTABILITY
TAX REVENUES
POLICY MAKERS
PERFORMANCE MONITORING
BASIC SERVICES
DISTRICT LEVEL
ANNUAL REPORTS
LEADERSHIP
NGO
FISCAL CONSOLIDATION
PUBLIC HEALTH
TRANSPARENCY
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE TRACKING
SOCIAL INDICATORS
INVESTMENT EXPENDITURE
GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE
RECURRENT EXPENDITURE
DEMOCRACY
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE OUTCOMES
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
PERFORMANCE AGREEMENTS
GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE
FEDERAL CONSTITUTION
TRAINING PROGRAMS
VILLAGES
AUDITOR-GENERAL
PUBLIC FUNDS
REFORM PROCESS
PUBLIC SPENDING
ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE
GOVERNMENT POLICY
PHYSICAL INDICATORS
INITIATIVE
GDP
POLICY-MAKERS
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
EXPENDITURES
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
PROJECT EVALUATION
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19000Abstract
This paper is discusses the evolution of India s approach to monitoring and evaluation of government programs. It is organized into 8 sections. (1) Describes the Indian government structure and sets the context for the challenges of building a government-wide M&E system in India. (2) Outlines a short history of the evaluation system under the planning commission and its stages of development. (3) Examines the demand side of evaluation the sources of demand for accountability, especially in recent years, and for evaluation in particular, and the locus of decisions regarding the selection of which programs to monitor and evaluate. (4) Discusses supply-side and operational issues such as staffing and capacity, and technical approaches (including the type or range of methodology applied). This section also examines the role of the private sector, think tanks, and civil society. (5) Examines the new institutional arrangements M&E. This section also examines the state of management information systems (MISs), outcome budgeting encouraged by the Ministry of Finance, and the performance management system as it operates in India. (6) Discusses the new Independent Evaluation Office (which became functional recently, in 2013). (7) Highlights the fiscal issues underpinning the emerging accountability and effectiveness processes. It outlines the current system of fiscal transfers from the center to the states and the highly centralized central-state fiscal relations, and how they may affect performance and evaluation. (8) Concludes with some observations about ways forward.Date
2013-10Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/19000978-1-60244-231-3
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19000
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Strengthening Institutions for the Preparation of Government BudgetsWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2011-02)The Government of Zimbabwe (GOZ) faces
 difficult choices in managing the size of its civil service
 wage bill. The Government understands the need to watch the
 escalating wage bill carefully and put in place a strategy
 to steer it to a sustainable level as early as possible.
 Historical and international comparisons suggest that an
 overall wage bill of around 10 percent of GDP should be the
 medium-term target. This note illustrates that Zimbabwe
 could take immediate steps in 2010 and 2011 that will put it
 on the path of a sustainable level of wage bill in the
 medium-term. The focus of efforts to contain the wage bill
 should be on short-term measures because designing and
 implementing a medium-term approach to wage bill management
 would be too challenging in view of prevailing economic
 uncertainty and complex political reality. The note covers
 the staff employed by the Central Government, including
 uniformed services and staff employed by the Grant-in-Aided
 (GIA) institutions. The staff employed by local governments
 and public enterprises are excluded because direct transfers
 from the central budget to local government and public
 enterprises are rather small. (annex A has an outline of the
 institutional aspects of civil service in Zimbabwe). Given
 the paucity of information, the note does not make any
 recommendations specific to the GIA wage bill.
-
Results, Performance Budgeting and Trust in GovernmentBrumby, Jim; Thomas, Theo; Senderowitsch, Roby; Manning, Nick; Arizti, Pedro; Thomas, Theo; Arizti, Pedro; Senderowitsch, Roby; Manning, Nick; Brumby, Jim (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2017-08-16)The book identifies four categories of
 performance budgeting, namely direct performance budgeting,
 performance informed budget (PIB), opportunistic performance
 budgeting and presentational performance budgeting. While
 the Conference papers often refer to performance budgeting
 broadly defined, much of the book focuses on PIB, the most
 common category of performance budgeting adopted to date,
 making the argument that this is likely to be the most
 applicable in many Latin American countries. The book
 combines two seemingly diverse governance topics, adopts
 contrasting analytic styles to address these, and seeks to
 draw out their inter-connections, with particular reference
 to Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
 (OECD) and Latin American countries. The first topic is PIB,
 which is discussed largely from the practical perspective of
 policy makers and practitioners, reflecting that it is a
 major public administration reform that has been underway
 for several decades. The second topic is the trust of
 citizens and firms in government. This book is divided into
 seven chapters. Chapter one provides an overview of PIB,
 building on two decades of experience and lesson-learning,
 and sets out the key themes that provide the basis for the
 discussions in the subsequent chapters. Chapter two
 introduces the concept of trust in government, particularly
 in OECD and Latin American countries, and explores why this
 matters for development. Chapters three, four, and five
 explore key dimensions of PIB, including the institutional
 foundations, the production of performance information, and
 the uses of performance information. Chapter six considers
 the impact of performance improvement on trust in government
 in OECD and Latin American countries. Chapter seven provides
 a guide for practitioners on PIB.
-
Improving Public Expenditures in AgricultureAmponsah, Kofi; Annor-Frempong, Charles (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2015-12-15)The objective of the agricultural sector public expenditure review (AgPER) was to examine the
 efficiency and effectiveness of agricultural sector expenditures in Mongolia. The AgPER provides policy makers with a better understanding of: (a) trends in the level and
 composition of public expenditures in agriculture over the past five to ten years; (b) the economic
 and functional composition of agriculture expenditures; (c) the budget processes and performance in
 the agriculture sector; (d) issues inhibiting the effectiveness and efficiency of public expenditures in
 agriculture.