Incentive Contracts for Environmental Services and Their Potential in REDD
Keywords
UNCERTAINTIESEMISSION CAP
CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS
BUY BACK
FORESTS
CARBON MEASUREMENT
WIND
PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT
IMPERFECT INFORMATION
LANDHOLDERS
ENVIRONMENTAL GOODS
FOREST PROJECTS
REPAYMENTS
GLOBAL GREENHOUSE GAS
OPPORTUNITY COSTS
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
ECONOMIC MODELS
EFFICIENCY GAINS
FORESTRY
INTEREST RATE
AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES
FOREST CARBON STORAGE
ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION
CREDIT SALES
FOREST PROJECT
LOWER COSTS
CARBON EMISSIONS
LIABILITY
DEVELOPING COUNTRY
PP
TROPICAL FOREST
ORIGINAL CONTRACT
LOGGING
UNEP
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
LANDOWNERS
RETURN
EMISSIONS LEVELS
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
EXPENDITURES
ADVERSE SELECTION
PARTICIPATION CONSTRAINTS
REPAYMENT
FOREST DEGRADATION
TRANSPARENCY
TRANSACTION
FORESTRY PROJECTS
FOREST LAND
FOREST MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
REDUCING EMISSIONS
CONTRACT DESIGN
ENERGY SOURCES
AFFORESTATION PROJECTS
OPTIMAL CONTRACT
TRADEOFFS
STORMS
TRUST FUND
MODEL CONTRACTS
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM
COST ESTIMATES
TOTAL COSTS
PORTFOLIOS
CARBON OFFSETS
CLIMATE POLICY
LAND HOLDINGS
CARBON STORAGE
FOREST
WATER QUALITY
FOSSIL FUEL
OFFSET PROJECTS
ENFORCEABILITY
BENEFICIARIES
MARKET TRANSACTIONS
INCOME
ENVIRONMENTAL
OFFSET PRICE
LANDHOLDER
VARIABLE COSTS
TROPICAL FORESTS
RESERVES
RESOURCE ECONOMICS
PENALTIES
TRANSACTION COSTS
CAPS
PORTFOLIO
OPPORTUNITY COST
SUPPLY SIDE
LEVEL OF RISK
FOSSIL FUEL EMISSION
AIR
TOTAL EMISSIONS
CARBON DIOXIDE
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
CARBON PRICES
TOTAL EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS
DEGRADED LAND
CARBON CREDITS
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS
FIXED COSTS
NATIONAL EMISSIONS
CO2
CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM
SUSTAINABLE FOREST
FOREST FIRE
CASH PAYMENTS
LAKES
MARGINAL COST
CONDITIONALITY
DEGREE OF RISK
FOREST AREA
SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT
DROUGHT
ACCOUNTING
FORESTRY SECTOR
ECONOMIC RISKS
FOREST PROTECTION
FOREST OFFSET
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
FOREST COMMUNITIES
FOREST SYSTEMS
SCENARIOS
LAND MANAGEMENT
LAND USE
ECONOMIES OF SCALE
FOREST AREAS
CAPACITY BUILDING
CHECKS
EMISSIONS FROM DEFORESTATION
GREENHOUSE GAS
ABATEMENT COSTS
CO
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
FOREST INVENTORIES
CARBON TRADING
FOREST CARBON
INSURANCE
ABATEMENT
MARKET PRICES
INVESTING
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
MARGINAL COSTS
POLICY MAKERS
INTERNATIONAL MARKET
CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE
BARREN LANDS
HOLDING
IPCC
STREAMS
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
TROPICAL FOREST REGIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
CLIMATE
BIOMASS
PLEDGES
ANNUAL CHANGE
TRANSACTIONS COSTS
DRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION
RURAL COMMUNITIES
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
BASELINE LEVELS
CLIMATE CHANGE
ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS
PROPERTY RIGHTS
CARBON FINANCE
FOREST CONVERSION
EMISSION REDUCTIONS
LOAN
LOWER PRICES
FIRE MANAGEMENT
MONETARY BENEFITS
CARBON OFFSET
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
CARBON MARKET
GLOBAL EMISSIONS
MORAL HAZARD
AFFORESTATION
CERTIFIED EMISSION REDUCTIONS
AUCTIONS
TRADE SYSTEM
TIMBER
FOREST MANAGEMENT
LEGAL SYSTEMS
FOREST CONSERVATION
GHGS
ANNUAL COSTS
DEFORESTATION RATES
MARKET PRICE
INTERNATIONAL MARKETS
CARBON PRICE
GREENHOUSE
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
PERFECT INFORMATION
ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGES
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
RESERVE
LAND-USE CHANGE
FOREST CARBON SEQUESTRATION
FOREST FIRES
FOREST RESOURCES
CARBON SEQUESTRATION
INTERNATIONAL BANK
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
ECOLOGY
DISCOUNT RATE
SOIL CARBON
FORESTRY ACTIVITIES
METHANE
WITHDRAWAL
SOCIAL CAPITAL
SET ASIDE
LANDOWNER
FOREST SERVICE
GHG
EXTERNALITIES
PRIVATE INFORMATION
OPTIMAL CONTRACTS
EXPENDITURE
ECOSYSTEM
CARBON MARKETS
EMISSIONS REDUCTION
ELECTRIC POWER
POPULATION PRESSURES
FINANCIAL INCENTIVES
FOREST INVENTORY
DISCOUNT RATES
EMISSION LEVELS
EROSION CONTROL
CARBON STOCKS
ENVIRONMENTS
ECONOMICS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17712Abstract
Implementation arrangements for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation can be seen as contracts that could address some of the inherent problems with forest carbon credits that often lead to high transaction costs -- measuring, monitoring, and verification. Self-enforcing contracts, where it is in the best interest of the environmental service providers to comply with the contracts, may be one way to reduce these costs if providers have incentives to uphold their end of the contract. While the literature on Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation is extensive, there is little information available to guide policy makers or investors on what form such contracts should take. After providing an overview of the current status of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and its role as a tool for reducing carbon emissions on an international scale, the paper describes key issues regarding implementation and reviews the literature on contracts from the related area of Payments for Ecosystem Services programs, which face similar challenges. The remainder of the paper reviews various contractual mechanisms from agricultural and forestry related projects that have been proposed or are being used in practice and discusses the various implications associated with their design and implementation.Date
2014-04-10Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/17712http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17712
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2011Linacre, Nicholas; Kossoy, Alexandre; Ambrosi, Philippe (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2011-06)After five consecutive years of robust growth, the total value of the global carbon market stalled at $142 billion. Suffering from the lack of post-2012 regulatory clarity, the value of the primary Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) market fell by double-digits for the third year in a row, ending lower than it was in 2005, the first year of the Kyoto protocol. The Assigned Amount Unit (AAU) and the United States Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) markets shrank as well. As these segments declined, the dominance of the European Union Allowances (EUAs) market became more pronounced than ever and the share of the carbon market primarily driven by the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) rose to 97 percent, dwarfing the remaining segments of the market. The carbon market growth halted at a particularly inopportune time: 2010 proved to be the hottest on record, while emission levels continued their seemingly inexorable rise. In the end, however, the year may be remembered most for the political opportunities that arose, yet were ultimately failed to materialize in the United States, Japan, Australia, and the Republic of Korea. While the international regulatory environment remains uncertain, national and local initiatives have noticeably picked up and may offer the potential to collectively overcome the international regulatory gap. These initiatives signal that, one way or another, solutions that address the climate challenge will emerge.
-
State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2011Ambrosi, Philippe; Linacre, Nicholas; Kossoy, Alexandre (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2011-06)After five consecutive years of robust growth, the total value of the global carbon market stalled at $142 billion. Suffering from the lack of post-2012 regulatory clarity, the value of the primary Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) market fell by double-digits for the third year in a row, ending lower than it was in 2005, the first year of the Kyoto protocol. The Assigned Amount Unit (AAU) and the United States Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) markets shrank as well. As these segments declined, the dominance of the European Union Allowances (EUAs) market became more pronounced than ever and the share of the carbon market primarily driven by the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) rose to 97 percent, dwarfing the remaining segments of the market. The carbon market growth halted at a particularly inopportune time: 2010 proved to be the hottest on record, while emission levels continued their seemingly inexorable rise. In the end, however, the year may be remembered most for the political opportunities that arose, yet were ultimately failed to materialize in the United States, Japan, Australia, and the Republic of Korea. While the international regulatory environment remains uncertain, national and local initiatives have noticeably picked up and may offer the potential to collectively overcome the international regulatory gap. These initiatives signal that, one way or another, solutions that address the climate challenge will emerge.
-
State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2008Capoor, Karan; Ambrosi, Philippe (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-05-14)The carbon market is the most visible result of early regulatory efforts to mitigate climate change. Regulation constraining carbon emissions has spawned an emerging carbon market that was valued at US$64 billion (Euro 47 billion) in 2007. Its biggest success so far has been to send market signals for the price of mitigating carbon emissions. This, in turn, has stimulated innovation and carbon abatement worldwide, as motivated individuals, communities, companies and governments have cooperated to reduce emissions. The European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) market has been successful in its mission of reducing emissions through internal abatement at home, and of stimulating emission reductions abroad. The European Commission, learning from the experience of Phase I, has strengthened several important design elements for EU ETS Phase II. Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) accounted for the vast majority of project-based transactions (at 87 percent of volumes and 91percent of values) and JI saw transacted volumes doubling and values tripling in 2007 over the previous year. The CDM alone saw primary transactions worth US$7.4 billion (Euro 5.4 billion), with demand coming mainly from private sector entities in the EU, but also from EU governments and Japan.