Author(s)
World BankKeywords
WINDCLIMATE
COLORS
CLEAN ENERGY
FINANCES
CLEAN TECHNOLOGY
CLIMATE VARIABILITY
PLEDGES
EXPENDITURE
ATMOSPHERE
INSURANCE SCHEMES
CURRENCY
INVESTMENT FUNDS
REMITTANCES
ENERGY SUBSIDIES
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE
CREDITOR
FOREST
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE
NATURAL RESOURCES
IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE
ENABLING ENVIRONMENTS
GREENHOUSE
HOST COUNTRIES
ALLOCATION
DEVELOPMENT FINANCE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
DESERTIFICATION
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM
CLEAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES
GLOBAL CLIMATE
ACCOUNTING
CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION INITIATIVE
FINANCIAL FLOWS
GREENHOUSE GAS
CLIMATE FORECASTING
GROSS NATIONAL INCOME
EMISSION REDUCTION
CLIMATE RISK
PRIMARY MARKET
TRANSACTION
CERTIFIED EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS
ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
FINANCIAL MECHANISM
DEVELOPING COUNTRY
FOREST INVESTMENT
CAPITAL MARKETS DEVELOPMENT
INTERNATIONAL FOREST CARBON
CERTIFIED EMISSION REDUCTIONS
CLIMATE CHANGE CHALLENGE
FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS
INFORMATION ON CLIMATE
INVESTMENT FINANCE
DEBT
TRANSPARENCY
GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE
PAYMENT FLOWS
DEGREE OF TRANSPARENCY
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
TRUST FUND
TRUSTEE
GOVERNMENT BUDGETS
EMISSION TRAJECTORIES
ISSUANCE
GLOBAL RECESSION
COST ESTIMATES
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES
CARBON TECHNOLOGIES
LOW-CARBON
ECONOMIC GROWTH
REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS
CAPITAL MARKETS
EMISSIONS FROM DEFORESTATION
PORTFOLIO
INSTRUMENT
INFORMATION ON CLIMATE CHANGE
CLIMATE CHANGE FUND
CLIMATE ACTION
CARBON MARKETS
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
FORESTRY
EMISSION
TAX
PUBLIC GOOD
TRUST FUNDS
SOVEREIGN ENTITY
ENERGY SECURITY
CLIMATE CHANGE
INTERNATIONAL BANK
PRIVATE DEBT
ADAPTATION FINANCING
CAPITAL FORMATION
INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL MARKETS
CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT
INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL
CAPITAL FLOW
TREATY
INVESTMENT DECISIONS
VULNERABILITY TO CLIMATE CHANGE
NATURAL DISASTER
PARTIAL RISK
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
PUBLIC GOODS
DOMESTIC SOURCES
CARBON FINANCE
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
CLIMATE RESILIENCE
LLC
LEVIES
CLIMATE STABILIZATION
INVESTMENT FLOWS
CLIMATE INVESTMENT
CLIMATE-CHANGE
CLIMATE INITIATIVE
NEGATIVE IMPACT
GHGS
INSURANCE
FOSSIL FUELS
PORTFOLIOS
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
CO
CLIMATE CHANGE PROGRAM
WIND FARMS
CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS
ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS
CROWDING OUT
DISCOUNT RATE
EMERGING ECONOMIES
CLIMATE CHANGE FUNDS
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY
CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION
ENVIRONMENTAL
EMISSIONS
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY
LEVY
COMPETITIVE MARKET
GREENHOUSE GAS CONCENTRATIONS
CARBON MARKET
GHG
INCOME
MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE
RENEWABLE ENERGY
WASTE MANAGEMENT
FIXED CAPITAL
UNEP
ENVIRONMENTS
DURABLE
CAPACITY BUILDING
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18423Abstract
The first major part of this paper focuses on tracking, monitoring, and reporting various types of flows, primarily from ODA (Official Development Assistance) and other public sources but also from private sources. It briefly reviews available information on various current and upcoming financial and investment flows to support climate action in developing countries as a first step in assessing the challenges associated with monitoring such flows. It considers both climate finance (the amount of additional resources required to catalyze the shift of a much larger volume of public and private development investments to climate friendlier options) and underlying finance (the almost 10 to 20 times larger amount of financial and investment flows in developing countries that must increasingly focus on climate action). The next part of the paper focuses on possible ways of tracking additionality in ODA flows, with the aim of stimulating a discussion within the World Bank Group (WBG) and its partners on this issue. It describes the various perceptions of different groups of countries as well as possible baselines, benchmarks, and tools for tracking progress. Increasingly reliable, comprehensive, and transparent reporting is needed to demonstrate that new climate finance instruments are not introduced at the expense of those targeting other objectives. The final section provides proposals for further action by industrial and developing countries, the U.N. system and multilateral development banks (MDBs).Date
2014-05-30Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/18423http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18423
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGOCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Accessing International Climate Change Related Finance in Latin America and the CaribbeanWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-10-03)Financing projects and programs to mitigate impacts of, and adapt to, the climate change is a matter of necessity not choice. This green expenditure policy note looks at factors facilitating the access to international financial instruments for Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) countries that support mitigation of and adaptation to climate change. This policy note explores two questions: (i) does the quality of government institutions matter for enabling action aimed at mitigation or adaptation to the climate change?; and (ii) what financial instruments are available to governments in addition to own resources to address climate change challenges? This policy note aims to present them with advice on how to achieve greater access to international financing or co-financing of projects supporting renewable and alternative energy generation for transport, agriculture, housing, preservation of unique ecosystems, and other projects supporting sustainable development. This policy note describes the climate challenges facing the LAC region and then discusses the various climate financing flows. It discusses the factors affecting LAC countries' access to climate financing, and how countries can apply to several of the principal global and regional climate funds. The objective is to disseminate knowledge that will help governments of all LAC countries, and particularly finance ministries, understand and access new climate funds and financing mechanisms. The policy note consists of three parts: part one reviews the global landscape of the climate change financing for mitigation and adaptation and emerging trends, identifies various financial instruments, and presents an overview of the LAC's share of available finances from several public financing sources, both bilateral and multilateral. Part two reviews two case studies for Bolivia and El Salvador that demonstrate how each of these countries addresses environmental challenges through its policies, institutional systems and involvement of the civil society. Part three includes technical annexes, which represent a compilation of technical information presenting main climate change financial instruments. A list of global and specialized climate funds of possible interest to LAC countries appear in annex one. A complementary list of climate finance instruments appears in annex two, in which climate funds as well as financial tools are named, described, and categorized according to their primary purpose. A more detailed description of several of the largest climate funds including when such funds were founded, their purpose, and eligibility requirements are presented in annex three. Annex four provides a step-by-step description of how to apply to the largest climate funds. Annex five lists the LAC projects that have been supported by Global Environment Facility (GEF) by country.
-
Beyond the Sum of Its PartsWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2017-08-14)The world development report 2010
 estimates that an additional $200 billion per year of
 climate-related financing is needed in developing countries
 between now and 2030 to keep global average temperature rise
 within 2 degrees Celsius. Developing countries face
 increased financing challenges over coming decades as they
 seek to pursue economic development along a lower emission
 trajectory. The goal of this paper is twofold: i) to provide
 greater information and clarity on these three
 mitigation-related climate financing instruments available
 for the World Bank Group (WBG) and their application in the
 context of specific projects and national policy frameworks;
 and ii) to draw lessons for the broader development
 community on how resources from different climate financing
 instruments can be combined for expanded impact, increased
 leverage, and enhanced efficiency. This paper represents an
 initial contribution to this field and will be followed by
 papers focusing on guarantees for low-carbon growth support
 for the private sector and the challenges of financing
 climate resilience and adaptation.
-
Joint MDB Report to the G8 on the Implementation of the Clean Energy Investment Framework and Their Climate Change Agenda Going ForwardEuropean Bank for Reconstruction and Development; World Bank Group; Inter-American Development Bank; Asian Development Bank; African Development Bank; European Investment Bank (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2017-09-11)The 2005 Gleneagles G8 summit in July
 2005 stimulated a concerted effort of the Multilateral
 Development Banks (MDBs) to broaden and accelerate programs
 on access to energy and climate change mitigation and
 adaptation through the Clean Energy Investment Framework
 (CEIF). At the Gleneagles summit, it was agreed that a
 report on the implementation of the CEIF would be prepared
 for the 2008 G8 (Group of Eight: Canada, France, Germany,
 Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United
 States) summit hosted by Japan. This joint report of the
 MDBs to the G8 summit in Hokkaido is intended to provide
 information on the outcomes and lessons learned under the
 CEIF, describe the collective MDB objectives for addressing
 the energy access and climate change challenges, and outline
 how the MDBs plan to build on the CEIF experience to date to
 more fully achieve these objectives. The report builds upon
 the 'the MDBs and the climate change agenda'
 report that was presented at the December 2007 Bali climate
 change conference. This report describes actions taken by
 each MDB to develop climate change strategies and programs
 of actions tailored to their particular client needs, based
 on resources and funding mechanisms currently available.
 Under the CEIF, the MDBs have strengthened collaboration on
 analytical work and programming and committed to expand this
 collaboration to optimize the impact of their collective
 actions. In addition to reporting on the status of the CEIF,
 this report outlines the collective ambition of the MDBs
 with respect to assisting the developing countries in
 meeting the climate change challenge, summarizes their
 evolving strategies designed to meet these objectives and
 the mechanisms through which they intend to achieve the
 necessary collaboration to optimize the collective impact of
 their climate change interventions.