Can Local Institutions Reduce Poverty? Rural Decentralization in Burkina Faso
Keywords
RURAL POPULATIONKNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS
LOCAL ELECTIONS
GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
CONSENSUS
DEMOCRACY
PARTICIPATORY ACTION
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
LOCAL LEVEL INSTITUTIONS
HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
DECENTRALIZATION
INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS
RURAL FINANCE
INCOME LEVELS
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT
POLICY RESEARCH
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
SOCIAL ACTION
PARTICIPATORY MONITORING
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
TRANSPARENCY
LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
POVERTY ERADICATION
EXPENDITURE
EXCLUDED GROUPS
LOCAL LANGUAGES
GROWTH PATH
DECISION-MAKING
SUSTAINABILITY
SERVICE PROVISION
LOCAL GOVERNANCE
DATA SETS
COMMUNITY LEVEL
POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY MEMBERS
ECONOMICS
RESEARCH TEAM
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
URBAN AREAS
ETHNIC GROUPS
NATIONAL LEVELS
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC GROWTH
INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS
SOCIAL STABILITY
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
HEALTH CENTERS
INEQUALITY
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
SOCIAL NORMS
LOCAL COUNCILS
REDUCING POVERTY
RURAL PEOPLE
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT
DEVELOPMENT NETWORK
AGRICULTURE
FIELD RESEARCH
DATA SET
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
PARTICIPATORY PROCESSES
INCOME
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
STATE AGENCY
STATE INTERVENTION
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGES
LOCAL INSTITUTIONS
FEDERATIONS
CIVIL SOCIETY
PARTICIPATORY APPROACH
NATIONAL RESEARCH
ECONOMIC OUTCOMES
CROPS
NATIONAL POLICIES
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
LANDS
ETHNIC GROUP
POLITICAL PARTIES
NATURAL RESOURCES
LOCAL PEOPLE
SOCIAL CAPITAL
LOCAL LEVEL
SOCIAL GROUP
LEGITIMACY
TEAM LEADERS
PARTICIPATORY ANALYSIS
ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
POVERTY REDUCTION
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ASSET MANAGEMENT
PROPAGANDA
RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATIONS
FOOD SECURITY
LIVING CONDITIONS
NATIONAL LEVEL
RESOURCE MOBILIZATION
ACCOUNTABILITY
POVERTY LEVELS
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19551Abstract
The authors present evidence that in Burkina Faso, certain high-performing local institutions contribute to equitable economic development. They link reduced levels of poverty, and inequality to a high degree of internal village organization. The structure of these high-performing local organizations means they can exist in a number of African countries, because they depend more on internal participation, rather than on nay one country's cultural assets. The authors find that: 1) Service-asset management groups (SAMs) - one of three local institutions identified in the study - have helped to significantly reduce inequality in participating households. SAMs are a fusion of long-standing development committees, and indigenous management councils that collectively manage community assets, such as water. SAMs have combined the productivity goals of growth, with the values of equity, and solidarity. 2) Current development approaches use growth as an initiator, assuming that surpluses will be used to benefit the poor. SAMs, and other local institutions in Burkina Faso, start with equity, and solidarity, and aim for a result of growth, and development. 3) Internal participation is essential for SAMs to function. Only locally anchored participation can power the realignments, and institutional revisions needed to scale up development action. SAMs, and other local institutions have launched their communities on equitable growth paths, and are reducing poverty with little, or no outside assistance, despite severe resource constraints. Their impact could be enormous if external development resources augmented their potential. World Bank programs, and policy interventions could build on local strength, and make their activities more sustainable by mapping local institutions to guide new initiatives in pro-poor investment, and using that mapping to formalize, and increase internal local participation - expanding nationwide by using a network of local institutions. SAMs, and other local institutions, could be the vehicle for ensuring transparency, and accountability. Working with the results of local activities, national policies could favor the development of indigenously based, but externally oriented local economies.Date
2001-09Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/19551http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19551
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Kenya - Community Driven Development : Challenges and OpportunitiesWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2013-08-27)The overall objective of this analytical work is to assess the possibilities for using a community driven development approach in Kenya, to increase formal linkages, downward accountability of service delivery mechanisms, and social inclusiveness in the poverty reduction effort. The report explores relevant policy, and institutional features which color the community driven development (CDD) experience in the country. In the attempt to summarize existing data, and experience on CDD, the focus remains on the various institutional approaches used by different programs. These include a wide spectrum from government and non-government, including a look at the enabling legal, and administrative environment for community mobilization, and civic engagement. Initially, the report provides a background, and introduction to the study, and in analyzing the CDD, aims to inform the Government's the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper process, and the Bank's Country Assistance Strategy. It then reviews major policies which had impacted the present socioeconomic circumstances, and attempts at CDD. This policy analysis mainly focuses on institutional issues, covering interactions between provincial administration, central line ministries, and local government, and service delivery. Recommendations suggest the instutionalisation of villages, empowerment and improvement of local authorities functioning, and, the design of a supportive development administration, options viewed not as mutually exclusive, but designed to provoke stakeholder discussions.
-
Participation, Decentralization and Human RightsFriis-Hansen, Esbern; Kyed, Helene Maria (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2017-09-11)This report examines the theoretical and
 practical synergies between three intervention models that
 are currently being employed to improve local governance in
 developing countries: 1) democratic decentralization or
 devolution; 2) community participatory approaches, and; 3)
 rights-based approaches. The aim is to identify the
 possibilities and challenges of an 'integrative
 approach' to local governance that combines the
 strengths of each of the three intervention models. It is
 assumed that an integrative approach can help enhance
 efforts to improve the downward accountability of local
 governments, enhance equity in the distribution of services
 and in various citizens' access to influence, and
 increase citizen participation in local governance
 processes. This is supported by a number of empirical cases
 from Africa, Latin America, Asia and Bosnia-Herzegovina,
 which are presented in the report. Each case also highlights
 a number of context-specific challenges to using an
 integrative approach, such as available financial resources,
 national policy environments and local conflicts. The report
 fills this gap by both identifying theoretical synergies and
 by drawing on the few empirical cases that exist.
-
Local and Community Driven
 Development : Moving to Scale in Theory and PracticeSpector, Stephen; De Regt, Jacomina P.; Binswanger-Mkhize, Hans P. (World Bank, 2010)Services are failing poor urban and
 rural people in the developing world, and poverty remains
 concentrated in rural areas and urban slums. This state of
 affairs prevails despite prolonged efforts by many
 governments to improve rural and urban services and
 development programs. This book focuses on how communities
 and local governments can be empowered to contribute to
 their own development and, in the process, improve
 infrastructure, governance, services, and economic and
 social development, that is, ultimately, the broad range of
 activities for sustainable poverty reduction. Countries and
 their development partners have been trying to involve
 communities and local governments in their own development
 since the end of Second World War, when the first colonies
 gained independence in South Asia. Pioneers in both India
 and Bangladesh (then a part of Pakistan) developed a clear
 vision of how it will be done: local development should be
 planned and managed by local citizens, their communities,
 and their local governments within a clearly defined
 decentralized framework that devolves real power and
 resources to local governments and communities. Capacity
 support will be provided by technical institutions and
 sectors and nongovernmental institutions.