The United Republic of Tanzania : Evaluation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Process and Arrangements under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility
Keywords
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTSILLITERACY
POLITICAL LIBERALIZATION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
RECURRENT EXPENDITURE
LEADERSHIP
ALLOCATION
HEALTH SECTOR
IMPACT ON POVERTY
FISCAL FEDERALISM
TARGETING
POLICY FORMULATION
BUDGETARY CONSTRAINTS
ABJECT POVERTY
CIVIL SOCIETY PARTICIPATION
MULTINATIONALS
HIPC
BUDGET MANAGEMENT PROCESS
RURAL
POVERTY REDUCTION TARGETS
POOR
POVERTY MONITORING SYSTEM
POVERTY SITUATION
TAX EVASION
SECTORAL REALLOCATION
PERFORMANCE BUDGETING
JUDICIARY
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
DEMOCRACY
ANALYTICAL CAPACITY
DONOR ASSISTANCE
BASELINE DATA
QUALITY OF EDUCATION
STRATEGIC RESOURCE ALLOCATION
INITIATIVE
SANITATION
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
MALNUTRITION
SECTOR EXPENDITURE
AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT
SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE
POVERTY INDICATORS
DEBT
MEMBER COUNTRIES
QUANTIFIABLE TARGETS
BUDGETARY RESOURCES
POOR FARMERS
GOVERNMENT REVENUE
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
HEALTH SERVICES
DONOR FUNDING
POVERTY MONITORING
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
SOCIAL INDICATORS
PARTICIPATORY POVERTY ASSESSMENT
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
PROGRAM DESIGN
POLICE
CAS
FISCAL AFFAIRS
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX
CASH BUDGETING
REFORM PROCESSES
NATIONAL POVERTY
DECISION-MAKING
HOUSEHOLD BUDGET
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE
FOREIGN DEBT
PUBLIC DEBT
BUDGET DEFICIT
ECONOMIC GROWTH
AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
POVERTY ERADICATION
RULING PARTY
ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES
EXPENDITURES
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS
ROLLING PLAN
DECENTRALIZATION
COLLAPSE
CASH BUDGET
POVERTY IMPACT
POVERTY REDUCTION EFFORTS
CIVIL SERVICE
BEST PRACTICES
TAX ADMINISTRATION
DATA COLLECTION
NATIONAL POVERTY LINES
MACROECONOMIC POLICY
NATIONAL STATISTICS
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
PRIVATIZATION
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY
CG
ANTI-CORRUPTION
MULTILATERAL DEBT FUND
SUBSISTENCE FARMERS
AGRICULTURAL INPUTS
SECTOR PROGRAMS
POOR COUNTRIES
FOREIGN COMPETITION
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
SOCIAL SERVICES
POVERTY REDUCTION PROGRAMS
ALLOCATION OF FUNDS
SOCIAL EXPENDITURES
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
NATIONAL POLICIES
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK
RULE OF LAW
MACROECONOMIC POLICIES
SOCIAL SERVICE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
TAX BASE
MASTER PLAN
ACCOUNTABILITY
SECTORAL EXPENDITURE
STRUCTURAL REFORMS
OVERSIGHT FUNCTION
RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS
ADJUSTMENT LENDING
EXPENDITURE PRIORITIES
JUSTICE
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
MACROECONOMIC FRAMEWORK
BUDGET SUPPORT
RURAL AREAS
INCOME
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
GOVERNMENT POLICY
MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE
PRIVATE SECTOR
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY PAPER
PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT
EXTERNAL DEBT
CONDITIONALITY
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
COMPLAINTS
SECTORAL INPUTS
DEBT OBLIGATIONS
REFORM PROGRAM
REFORM PROCESS
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
ECONOMIC POLICIES
SECTOR MINISTRY
BUDGET DISCIPLINE
ANALYTICAL SKILLS
SECTOR BUDGET
LACK OF INCENTIVES
RECURRENT EXPENDITURES
GOOD GOVERNANCE
BUDGET ESTIMATES
INCOME POVERTY
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
DRINKING WATER
POVERTY LINE
CONFLICT
INFLATION
PREFERENTIAL
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
FISCAL STANCE
EDUCATION SERVICES
EXTERNAL SHOCKS
POVERTY REDUCTION
INFORMATION FLOW
POVERTY REDUCTION SUPPORT
GOVERNMENT SPENDING
NATIONAL POLICY
TAX REFORM
AID EFFECTIVENESS
ANNUAL WORK PROGRAM
BUDGET CYCLE
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENT
TAXPAYERS
POVERTY FOCUS
AID DONORS
TAX EXEMPTIONS
DEBT RELIEF
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY
BUDGET YEAR
UNEMPLOYMENT
GROSS FIXED CAPITAL FORMATION
BUDGETING PROCESS
SECTORAL POLICIES
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
SERVICE DELIVERY
WAR
PUBLIC SERVICE
NGO
POVERTY PROFILE
SECTOR MINISTRIES
TRANSPARENCY
DISTRIBUTIONAL ISSUES
INEQUALITY
COST EFFECTIVENESS
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20219Abstract
This evaluation of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) and Poverty Reduction Growth Facility (PRGF) processes in Tanzania was jointly undertaken by the Operations Evaluation Department (OED) of the World Bank and the Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) of the IMF. The goal of the evaluation, as emphasized in the joint terms of reference, is to inform the policies and internal processes of the World Bank and the IMF, but not to evaluate the performance of the government. The report is laid out as follows: section two provides a background to the poverty situation in Tanzania as well as the economic and political context. The section also looks at the national strategies and processes for policy formulation that preceded the introduction of the PRSP and the PRGF. Section three discusses the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper process in Tanzania, starting with a look at the relevance of the process to the key development challenges facing the country and then turns to the issue of how the underlying principles of the PRSP have been applied. It concludes with an analysis of the preliminary results.Date
2014-09-17Identifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/20219http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20219
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
PRSPs and BudgetsJudge, Lindsay; Klugman, Jeni; Alonso, Rosa (A Synthesis of Five Case Studies, 2005-01-18)This paper synthesizes the findings from
 a series of case studies on the interaction between the PRSP
 process and the budget. The five studies, Bolivia, Burkina
 Faso, Cambodia, Tanzania and Vietnam aim to assess the
 extent to which public finance management and budget
 allocations reflect the principles and content of the
 Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper PRSP, hence providing
 insights into progress in PRS implementation. The cases also
 shed light on whether the PRSP process itself has fostered
 more accountable, efficient and pro-poor budget processes
 and allocations as of 2003.The PRSP process, with its focus
 on data and information for evidence-based policy-making,
 open and participatory policy-making processes, poverty
 results and country-led donor coordination, alignment and
 harmonization has the potential to significantly improve the
 pro-poor focus and general accountability of budgeting
 processes.The cases confront a number of methodological
 challenges. First, in some countries and sectors, lack of
 appropriate data constrained the extent to which the
 research questions could be fully answered. Second, the PRSP
 remains a relatively recent innovation in all the countries
 studied and we recognize that many of our findings are
 preliminary, and require additional confirmation over time.
 Third, any assessment of the value added of the PRSP
 approach needs to be cognizant of the initial conditions in
 country, both to avoid ascribing successes to the PRSP which
 pre-date its existence, and to temper expectations about
 what the approach can deliver in a relatively short space of
 time given the starting point of each country. To address
 this last challenge, the case studies explicitly acknowledge
 the pre-existing situation in-country and try to assess the
 value added of the PRSP process.The four countries studied
 have a number of common features.Finally, and perhaps most
 importantly, all five countries share a high-level political
 commitment to addressing poverty, although the extent to
 which this commitment permeates throughout government
 agencies varies from country to country.The five countries,
 however, also display many distinctive features. Bolivia and
 Cambodia, for example, both suffer from high degrees of
 political fragmentation, which in Bolivia has manifested
 itself as civil unrest on a number of occasions in the last
 two years. Burkina Faso, Tanzania, and Vietnam, on the other
 hand, benefit from more stable political systems and an
 inherited commitment to pro-poor policies from socialist governments.
-
Chad Public Expenditure Review in the Agricultural, Rural Development, and Food Security SectorWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-08-13)Over the review period covered by this
 report (2003-2012), the budget allocated to agriculture
 increased noticeably more than the sector’s contribution to
 GDP. This reflects a notable effort by the Chad authorities
 to increase the budget to boost this sector’s development in
 recent years. In this proactive context, Chad signed its
 CAADP compact in December 2013 to continue supporting
 agriculture’s revival. The CAADP is being implemented in
 Chad even as the terms of the National Rural Sector
 Investment Program (PNISR, 2014-2020) are being finalized.
 Within the context of the CAADP, the Government of Chad
 (GOC) wished to undertake a review of public agriculture
 expenditures to learn from past budgetary implementation in
 this sector with a view to improving future program
 performance. Following a request by the Ministry of
 Agriculture and Irrigation (MoAI), the NEPAD planning and
 coordination agency gave Chad it’s backing for this review.
 This process was undertaken by the Program for Strengthening
 National Comprehensive Agricultural Public Expenditure in
 Sub-Saharan Africa, co-financed by the Bill and Melinda
 Gates Foundation and the CAADP Multi-Donor Trust Fund. This
 program, implemented by the World Bank, aims to improve the
 impact of the still-limited public resources available to
 governments in Sub-Saharan Africa to foster agricultural
 development and reduce poverty in rural areas, where most of
 the poor in these countries, notably Chad, live. This study
 follows and builds upon a number of similar studies
 conducted in recent years on public expenditure management,
 in particular in Chad the Action Plan for the Modernization
 of Public Finances (PAMFIP). However, these studies have
 focused on budget management as a whole, and none to date
 has looked at the agricultural sector specifically.
-
Common Practices in Setting Expenditure Ceilings within National BudgetsWatkins, Joanna; Dorotinsky, William (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016-11-29)Developing a national budget has always
 entailed a complex set of negotiations between national
 Government priorities, line ministry priorities, and a
 national funding envelope. This note explains how to
 introduce a medium term horizon into a government’s
 budgeting process, including the key steps involved. It
 provides guidance on setting aggregate and line ministry
 ceilings, reviewing experiences from countries with
 extensive experience of ceilings (for example, Finland, the
 Netherlands, Sweden, South Korea, Indonesia, Brazil,
 Australia, and Canada, among others), as well as those that
 have more recently adopted them. There is no one right way
 to set expenditure ceilings. Countries tailor expenditure
 ceilings to meet their specific needs, budget challenges,
 and capacity constraints. This note presents an iterative
 approach - starting from annual ceilings and gradually
 moving toward a medium-term expenditure framework - allowing
 for procedural, institutional, and organizational learning
 and adaptation along the way.