The Importance of Stakeholder Ownership for Capacity Development Results
Author(s)
Smithers, NicolaKeywords
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGEEDUCATION SECTOR
CIVIC SOCIETY
PARTICIPANTS
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
VILLAGES
SERVICE PROVIDERS
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
HUMAN RIGHTS
STAKEHOLDERS
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
CONSULTATION
CIVIL SERVANTS
EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
ACCOUNTABILITY
LABOR LAWS
PARTICIPATORY PROCESS
BUDGET ANALYSIS
LISTENING
RECONSTRUCTION
CITIZENSHIP
PREPARATION
INCENTIVES
TRADE UNIONS
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT
PARTICIPATION MECHANISMS
FISCAL TRANSPARENCY
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH
CORRUPTION
RELEVANCE
FOCUS GROUP
TRANSPARENCY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
COLLABORATION
WORKSHOP
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
VILLAGE
GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
DEMOCRACY
PARTICIPATORY BUDGET
BENEFICIARIES
BUDGET SYSTEMS
PARTNERS
COMMUNITY DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
OVERSIGHT
SOCIAL COST
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY
CIVIL SERVICE
RIGHT TO INFORMATION
GRANTS
INTEREST GROUPS
BENEFICIARY PARTICIPATION
CAPACITY BUILDING
LINE MINISTRIES
BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS
SOCIAL JUSTICE
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
PARTICIPATION
FEASIBILITY
OUTREACH
GOOD GOVERNANCE
BUDGET PROJECT
BUSINESS COMMUNITY
ANTI- CORRUPTION
COURT SYSTEM
POVERTY REDUCTION
CONSULTATIONS
MARGINALIZED GROUPS
SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
CIVIL SOCIETY ACTORS
FIGURES
BUDGET REFORMS
SERVICE DELIVERY
DISCRIMINATION
SOCIAL ORGANIZATION
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY
EDUCATION SERVICE DELIVERY
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION
DEBT RELIEF
PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING
LEVELS OF PARTICIPATION
SEXUAL ORIENTATION
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
CIVIL SOCIETY GROUPS
AWARENESS RAISING
FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS
CORRUPT OFFICIALS
STAKEHOLDER INTERESTS
ACCESS
ACCOUNTABILITY RELATIONSHIP
CIVIL SOCIETY AWARENESS
STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION
BUDGET TRANSPARENCY
ADVOCACY
PARTICIPATORY APPROACHES
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
CIVIL SOCIETY
STAKEHOLDER
INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING
PARTICIPATORY PLANNING
SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY INITIATIVES
CONSENSUS
LOCAL GROUPS
CIVIC ENGAGEMENT
LIVING STANDARDS
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
LOCAL INPUT
SURVEY
ANTI-CORRUPTION
BUILDING CONSENSUS
SOCIAL SERVICES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23034Abstract
Capacity development is widely accepted as critical to achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) and other development outcomes, but the results from capacity development initiatives have often been disappointing. This challenge signifies the urgent need to advance capacity development knowledge and practice. As a contribution to addressing this challenge, the World Bank Institute (WBI) has developed a strategic, country-led and approach to results focused capacity development, which involves collective action across society and an emphasis throughout on achieving results. The conceptual framework and processes for WBI’s approach are captured in the Capacity Development and Results Framework (CDRF) (Otoo, Agapitova and Behrens 2009). The focus of this paper is on the strength of stakeholder ownership. Drawing on a review of recent studies, literature and relevant examples, this paper seeks to deepen understanding of the importance of stakeholder ownership and its contributing institutional characteristics to achieving development goals. The paper identifies future collaborative research that would shed light on which change strategies are likely to be most effective in strengthening stakeholder ownership in different contexts.Date
2015-11-18Type
Publications & ResearchIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/23034http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23034
Copyright/License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Participatory Budgeting : Contents of CD RomShah, Anwar (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012-05-30)This book provides an overview of the principles underlying participatory budgeting. It analyzes the merits and demerits of participatory budgeting practices around the world with a view to guiding policy makers and practitioners on improving such practices in the interest of inclusive governance. This publication includes five regional surveys, and seven country case studies can be found on the accompanying CD ROM. The study explains that participatory budgeting has been advanced by budget practitioners and academics as an important tool for inclusive and accountable governance and has been implemented in various forms in many developing countries around the globe. It adds that through participatory budgeting, citizens have the opportunity to gain firsthand knowledge of government operations, influence government policies, and hold government to account. However, participatory processes also run the risk of capture by interest groups. Captured processes may continue to promote elitism in government decision making. This book examines the potential and perils of participatory budgeting, as observed from practices around the globe. It is divided into three parts. Part I presents the nuts and bolts of participatory budgeting. Part II surveys experiences with participatory budgeting in various regions of the world. Part III (Vol. 2) is on the CD ROM accompanying this book, and it examines case studies of practices in seven countries.
-
Demanding Good Governance : Lessons
 from Social Accountability Initiatives in AfricaMalena, Carmen; McNeil, Mary (World Bank, 2012-03-19)This is a challenging time for Africa.
 The combined effects of the global economic crisis, the need
 for equitable allocation of natural resource assets, and the
 ever-changing balance of influence and power between the
 developed and developing worlds are requiring African
 countries to re-evaluate their governance structures.
 "Social accountability," as defined in this book,
 is an approach to enhancing government accountability and
 transparency. It refers to the wide range of citizen actions
 to hold the state to account, as well as actions on the part
 of government, media, and other actors that promote or
 facilitate these efforts. Social accountability strategies
 and tools help empower ordinary citizens to exercise their
 inherent rights and to hold governments accountable for the
 use of public funds and how they exercise authority. Global
 experience has shown that such initiatives can be catalytic
 and that they increasingly play a critical role in securing
 and sustaining governance reforms that strengthen
 transparency and accountability. The case studies presented
 in this book represent a cross-section of African countries,
 drawing on initiatives launched and implemented both by
 civil society groups and by local and national governments
 in countries with different political contexts and cultures.
 Over the past decade, a wide range of social accountability
 practices- such as participatory budgeting, independent
 budget analysis, participatory monitoring of public
 expenditures and citizen evaluation of public services-have
 been developed and tested in countries such as Brazil,
 India, the Philippines, and South Africa. In less developed
 Sub-Saharan African countries, civil society and government
 actors are also actively creating and experimenting with
 social accountability approaches (and tools), but these
 experiences, their outcomes, and lessons have received less
 attention and been less documented, studied, and shared.
 This volume aims to help fill this gap by describing and
 analyzing a selection of social accountability initiatives
 from seven Sub-Saharan countries: Benin, Ghana, Malawi,
 Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe.
-
Demanding Good Governance : Lessons from Social Accountability Initiatives in AfricaMalena, Carmen; McNeil, Mary (World Bank, 2010)This is a challenging time for Africa. The combined effects of the global economic crisis, the need for equitable allocation of natural resource assets, and the ever-changing balance of influence and power between the developed and developing worlds are requiring African countries to re-evaluate their governance structures. "Social accountability," as defined in this book, is an approach to enhancing government accountability and transparency. It refers to the wide range of citizen actions to hold the state to account, as well as actions on the part of government, media, and other actors that promote or facilitate these efforts. Social accountability strategies and tools help empower ordinary citizens to exercise their inherent rights and to hold governments accountable for the use of public funds and how they exercise authority. Global experience has shown that such initiatives can be catalytic and that they increasingly play a critical role in securing and sustaining governance reforms that strengthen transparency and accountability. The case studies presented in this book represent a cross-section of African countries, drawing on initiatives launched and implemented both by civil society groups and by local and national governments in countries with different political contexts and cultures. Over the past decade, a wide range of social accountability practices- such as participatory budgeting, independent budget analysis, participatory monitoring of public expenditures and citizen evaluation of public services-have been developed and tested in countries such as Brazil, India, the Philippines, and South Africa. In less developed Sub-Saharan African countries, civil society and government actors are also actively creating and experimenting with social accountability approaches (and tools), but these experiences, their outcomes, and lessons have received less attention and been less documented, studied, and shared. This volume aims to help fill this gap by describing and analyzing a selection of social accountability initiatives from seven Sub-Saharan countries: Benin, Ghana, Malawi, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe.