Author(s)
World BankKeywords
FINANCIAL RISKSINDEPENDENCE
PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION
HUMAN RESOURCES
GOOD GOVERNANCE
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
TRANSPARENCY
ENFORCEMENT
LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
GOVERNMENTS
STATE CONTROL
INTERNAL AUDIT
POLITICAL INTERFERENCE
PUBLIC POLICY
DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION
PRIVATE OWNERSHIP
STATE ASSETS
POLITICAL ELITES
PUBLIC DEBT
LEGISLATION
AUTHORITY
PUBLIC RESOURCES
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
MINISTERS
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY
REVOLUTION
STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES
PRIVATIZATION PROCEEDS
PUBLIC SERVICE
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
STATE FUNDING
GOVERNMENT REVENUE
EMPLOYMENT GENERATION
LEGAL FORM
SOCIAL RETURNS
DECISION-MAKING
ENTERPRISE REFORM
LEGAL STRUCTURES
FINANCIAL AUDITS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
PUBLIC FUNDS
ADMINISTRATIVE AUTONOMY
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
GOVERNANCE
REGULATORY REGIMES
LABOR PRODUCTIVITY
STATE ENTERPRISES
REGIONS
BUREAUCRATIC POWER
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
RESPONSIBILITY
OVERSIGHT
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
STATE BUDGET
DISCLOSURE
RISK MANAGEMENT
CENTRALIZATION
SOCIAL SAFETY NET
INFORMAL ECONOMY
PRIVATE SECTOR GROWTH
PUBLIC POLICIES
SOCIAL POLICIES
POLITICAL POWER
EXECUTION
POOR GOVERNANCE
STATE
REGULATORY BODIES
LAW
REGULATORY BODY
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
PUBLIC FUNDING
STATE INTERVENTION
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
STATE SUBSIDIES
GOVERNMENT
FISCAL
PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
ACCOUNTABILITY
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC INVESTMENT
POLITICAL CONTROL
CORRUPTION
FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION
EMBEZZLEMENT
REPRESENTATION
DECREE
HUMAN CAPITAL
FINANCIAL DISCIPLINE
INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
STATE BANKS
NATIONS
FOREIGN OWNERSHIP
STATE PARTICIPATION
MINISTRIES
NATIONALIZATION
FOREIGN INVESTMENT
FINANCIAL CONTROL
AUDIT
AUTHORITIES
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
NATIONALISM
INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY
PUBLIC INVESTMENTS
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
STATE OWNERSHIP
HUMAN RESOURCE
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
CONSTITUTION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL AUTONOMY
CITIZENS
SOCIAL SAFETY
POLITICIANS
FINANCING
GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP
FOREIGN TRADE
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
PUBLIC FINANCE
STATES
MANAGERIAL AUTONOMY
REPRESENTATIVES
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22749Abstract
The state-owned enterprise (SOE) landscape has become increasingly diverse. There used to be some relatively well-defined criteria, but with the growing complexity of state participation in the economy, there is no longer a uniform definition, and especially because the definition of a SOE has always been country-specific. SOE reforms can have major positive impacts not only by reducing fiscal risks by decreasing hidden subsidies, direct transfers, and overstaffing, but also by strengthening competition and developing capital markets. SOE reforms in developing countries began in the 1960s because of the poor performance of many of the SOEs. The reform movement sought to strengthen the internal capacity of SOEs. To enrich the discussion about possible avenues for performance-enhancing SOE reforms, this report presents the main principles of good governance of SOEs with references to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines on corporate governance of SOEs (OECD 2005). This document is divided into six parts: (1) an effective legal and regulatory framework for SOEs; (2) the state as an owner; (3) equitable treatment of shareholders; (4) relations with stakeholders; (5) transparency and disclosure; and (6) the responsibilities of the boards of SOEs.Date
2015-10-08Type
ReportIdentifier
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/22749http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22749
Copyright/License
CC BY 3.0 IGORelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Governance of State Owned Enterprises and Public Agencies in the Islamic Republic of MauritaniaWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-11-06)This study analyzes the governance
 framework of the business portfolio of Mauritanian
 institutions and government agencies and offers avenues for
 reform. The report begins with an overview of the scope of
 work and performance of the portfolio mentioned using the
 term Para-Statal sector and identifies the main challenges
 represented by this sector. It then analyzes the governance
 framework of Para-statal sector of Mauritania through
 comparative references from the guidelines of the OECD. The
 diagnosis includes an analysis of the legal framework, the
 supervisory function, risk monitoring budget and performance
 in terms of delivery of services, advice to administration,
 transparency and dissemination of information. The report
 closes with a detailed and sequenced action plan compiled
 from observations in the diagnosis and offers a series of
 suggestions for appropriate reforms to the institutional
 context of Mauritania. The action plan focuses primarily on
 strengthening the monitoring of risk of the budget and
 proposes ways of sequenced reforms taking into account both
 international examples and the Mauritanian context.
-
Gouvernance du secteur parapublic en Republique Islamique de MauritanieWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2015-11-06)This study analyzes the governance framework of the business portfolio of Mauritanian institutions and government agencies and offers avenues for reform. The report begins with an overview of the scope of work and performance of the portfolio mentioned using the term Para-Statal sector and identifies the main challenges represented by this sector. It then analyzes the governance framework of Para-statal sector of Mauritania through comparative references from the guidelines of the OECD. The diagnosis includes an analysis of the legal framework, the supervisory function, risk monitoring budget and performance in terms of delivery of services, advice to administration, transparency and dissemination of information. The report closes with a detailed and sequenced action plan compiled from observations in the diagnosis and offers a series of suggestions for appropriate reforms to the institutional context of Mauritania. The action plan focuses primarily on strengthening the monitoring of risk of the budget and proposes ways of sequenced reforms taking into account both international examples and the Mauritanian context.
-
Tajikistan : Fiscal Risks from State-Owned EnterprisesWorld Bank (Washington, DC, 2014-06)This policy note is part of the World
 Bank's Programmatic Public Expenditure Review (PER)
 work program for FY2012-2014. The PER consists of a series
 of fiscal policy notes, which aim at providing the
 Government of Tajikistan with recommendations to strengthen
 budgetary processes and analysis. This policy note, the
 fifth in the series continues the fiscal policy dialogue
 conducted in the previous notes. It is structured as
 follows. Chapter 2 reviews the role of state-owned
 enterprises (SOE) in Tajikistan's economy and
 identifies key issues. Chapter 3 assesses the fiscal risks
 posed by SOEs, especially those in the energy sector.
 Chapter 4 puts forth possible solutions. Chapter 5
 summarizes the main conclusions of this note: 1) despite
 privatizations and attempts at restructuring, Tajikistan
 still has a large, inefficient, and heavily indebted public
 sector; 2) the lack of comprehensive information about the
 sector undermines budget credibility and budget integrity;
 3) multiple but uncoordinated functions, responsibilities,
 and accountability lines limit government ability to form a
 comprehensive view of the SOE sector, define a consistent
 strategy, and effect transparency, performance, reporting,
 and oversight; 4) elaborate QFAs of SOEs and other public
 institutions create substantial fiscal risks and undermine
 the hard-earned benefits of fiscal consolidation; 5)
 liabilities, explicit and implicit, created by SOE
 operations are large and must be accounted for and properly
 delineated; 6) solutions proposed to address the major
 issues are phasing out QFAs, optimizing the size and scope
 of the SOE sector, and improving SOE management; and 7) SOE
 reform should be an integral part of the general reform agenda.