Ethical Considerations in Oncology: Balancing the Interests of Patients, Oncologists, and Society
Keywords
Allowing to DieAutonomy
Allocation of Resources
Beneficence
Cancer
Case Studies
Clinical Ethics
Clinical Ethics Committees
Conflict of Interest
Consent
Consultation
Disclosure
Drugs
Doctors
Economics
Ethical Analysis
Ethics
Ethics Committees
Futility
Goals
Health
Health Facilities
Health Insurance
Hospital Ethics Committees
Informed Consent
Insurance
Justice
Legal Aspects
Life
Medical Ethics
Methods
Palliative Care
Patient Care
Patient Participation
Patients
Physician Self-Referral
Physicians
Prognosis
Proprietary Health Facilities
Quality of Life
Radiation
Resource Allocation
Review
Risk
Risk Management
Withholding Treatment
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Ethical+Considerations+in+Oncology:+Balancing+the+Interests+Of+patients,+Oncologists,+and+Society&title=Journal+of+Clinical+Oncology.++&volume=13&issue=9&pages=2464-2470&date=1995&au=Smith,+Thomas+J.http://hdl.handle.net/10822/750936
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oncologists face ethical dilemmas every day in deciding about choice of treatment, continuation of treatments, events near the end of life, conflicts of interest, and risk management. Yet, many oncologists have limited training in ethics. METHODS: Review of existing studies and definitions of useful terms. Case studies analyzed according to ethical principles. RESULTS: Individual oncology cases can be analyzed according to ethical principles with benefit to the patient, physician, and possibly society. Ethics cannot resolve many of the thorny questions about allocation of resources, justice, or possible conflict of interest. CONCLUSION: Oncology decision-making fits into formal ethical frameworks, and understanding both can help doctors and patients make difficult choices. Understanding of ethical principles can help daily practice, but does not solve current dilemmas of allocation of resources, unrealistic demands, etc. More formal collaboration between hospital ethics committees or personnel and clinical oncologists is recommended for the day-to-day decision-making process.Date
2015-05-05Identifier
oai:repository.library.georgetown.edu:10822/750936Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1995 Sep; 13(9): 2464-2470.
0732-183X
http://worldcatlibraries.org/registry/gateway?version=1.0&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&atitle=Ethical+Considerations+in+Oncology:+Balancing+the+Interests+Of+patients,+Oncologists,+and+Society&title=Journal+of+Clinical+Oncology.++&volume=13&issue=9&pages=2464-2470&date=1995&au=Smith,+Thomas+J.
http://hdl.handle.net/10822/750936
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und BibliothekareFerus, A. (Andreas) (Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare, 2014-03)Heft 1 des 67. Jahrgangs (2014) der Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare
-
Ethical Issues in the Big Data IndustryMartin, Kirsten E (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2015-05-28)Big Data combines information from diverse sources to create knowledge, make better predictions and tailor services. This article analyzes Big Data as an industry, not a technology, and identifies the ethical issues it faces. These issues arise from reselling consumers' data to the secondary market for Big Data. Remedies for the issues are proposed, with the goal of fostering a sustainable Big Data Industry.Click here for podcast summary (mp3)Click here for free 2-page executive summary (pdf)Click here for free presentation slides (pptx)
-
But What IS the 'Right Thing'?: Ethics and Information Systems in the Corporate DomainSmith, H. Jeff (AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2008-02-08)Information systems executives, and other executives, are often prodded to "do the right thing" when they face ethical quandaries. But how do they determine what is "right" ethically, especially when the ethical quandaries occur in the corporate domain? Some individuals rely solely on their own emotions, but they often have a hard time convincing rational thinkers to embrace their position. Other individuals rely on traditional philosophical theories, but this approach is seldom optimal in the corporate domain because the traditional philosophical theories do not specifically address the corporate setting. However, two theories do address ethical quandaries in the private sector: stockholder theory and stakeholder theory. This article discusses these two theories. Stockholder theory holds that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by taking actions that maximize the long-term profits to stockholders without violating the law or engaging in fraud or deception. Stakeholder theory claims that executives should resolve ethical quandaries by balancing stakeholder interests without violating the rights of any stakeholder. These theories are explored by first applying them to a specific real-world quandary: Blockbuster Video's reported plans to market its customer lists. Then the theories are applied to several other current quandaries. Finally, the article explores action steps for applying each theory.