A Discouraging Omen: A Critical Evaluation of the Approved Uniform Language for Testimony and Reports for the Forensic Latent Print Discipline
Author(s)
Cole, Simon AKeywords
Fingerprint EvidenceFingerprinting
Fingerprint Identification
Forensic Evidence
Forensic Science
Forensic Latent Print
Latent Print Identification
ULTR
Law Review
Constitutional Law
Courts
Criminal Law
Criminal Procedure
Evidence
Law
Law and Society
Law Enforcement and Corrections
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Science and Technology Law
State and Local Government Law
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol34/iss4/7https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2942&context=gsulr
Abstract
The theme of the 2018 Georgia State University Law Review symposium is the Future of Forensic Science Reform. In this Article, I will assess the prospects for reform through a critical evaluation of a document published in February 2018 by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the Approved Uniform Language for Testimony and Reports for the Forensic Latent Print Discipline (ULTR). I argue that this document provides reason to be concerned about the prospects of forensic science reform. In Part I, I discuss the background of the ULTR. In Part II, I undertake a critical evaluation of the ULTR. In the Conclusion, I discuss why the importance of the ULTR extends beyond merely one document and one discipline to implicate the future of forensic science reform more generally.Date
2018-08-01Type
textIdentifier
oai:readingroom.law.gsu.edu:gsulr-2942https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol34/iss4/7
https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2942&context=gsulr