Strafe als gemeinsame Handlung von Eltern und Kind: ein Vorschlag zur Konzeptionalisierung und Rechtfertigung elterlicher Strafakte
Author(s)
Hahn, HenningKeywords
PhilosophieRecht
Philosophy
Law
Strafzwecktheorien; gemeinsame Handlung; restaurative Gerechtigkeit; körperliche Strafen
Philosophie, Theologie
Recht
Philosophy, Ethics, Religion
Law
Kind
Eltern
Strafe
Eltern-Kind-Beziehung
Gewalt
Autorität
Legitimation
Disziplinierung
Gerechtigkeit
Ethik
Rechtsphilosophie
child
parents
penalty
parent-child relationship
violence
authority
legitimation
disciplinary measures
justice
ethics
philosophy of law
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/56428https://doi.org/10.3224/diskurs.v13i1.03
Abstract
Das erste Ziel meiner Argumentation besteht darin zu verdeutlichen, dass sich Fragen der Strafbefugnis, des Strafzwecks und des Strafmaßes elterlicher Strafpraxis nicht einfach als ein Anwendungsbereich klassischer Strafzwecktheorien erklären lassen. Der Strafzweck ist hier ein anderer, die sanktionierten Normen reichen tiefer in das persönliche Verhalten hinein und vor allem ist die Beziehung zwischen Bestrafendem und Bestraftem eine genuin andere als die zwischen staatlichen Organen und mündigen Bürgern. In einem zweiten Schritt werde ich meinen positiven Vorschlag erläutern, elterliche Strafe stattdessen als eine gemeinsame Handlung zu beschreiben und zu rechtfertigen. Dieser Vorschlag setzt an der jüngsten Theoriebildung zu kollektiver Intentionalität an. Interpersonale bzw. elterliche Strafe ist demnach keine Handlung, die ein Subjekt an einem Objekt vornimmt; eine gelungene Strafhandlung ließe sich viel besser, so meine Kernthese, als eine gemeinsame Handlung beschreiben, in der Kind und Erwachsener in beidseitiger intentionaler Übereinstimmung zum Strafakt beitragen. Ausblickend werde ich zeigen, dass diese Sichtweise ein starkes Argument gegen körperliche Strafen impliziert.The first aim of my argument is to clarify why conventional justifications of juridical punishment - and theories of criminal justice in general - are not applicable to the case of parental punishment. The specific function of juridical punishment concerns the compliance of law-abiding citizens. This differs considerably from the function of parental punishment with respect to the purpose of the punitive action and the intimate and responsive relation between parents and child. In a second step, I will come up with a positive proposal to describe and ultimately justify parental punishment in terms of a joint action. This proposal draws on recent writings in the theory of collective action and intentionality. Parental punishment is not to be seen as an act that is committed by a subject (the parents) and suffered by an object (the child); rather, it should be conceptualized as a certain type of joint action that is committed in intentional agreement by both parents and child. In the outlook, I will argue that this perspective implies a strong argument against corporal punishment.
Date
2018-03-15Type
ZeitschriftenartikelIdentifier
oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/564281862-5002
https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/56428
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-56428-8
https://doi.org/10.3224/diskurs.v13i1.03
Copyright/License
Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine BearbeitungRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Sexuated Topology and the Suspension of Meaning: A Non-Hermeneutical Phenomenological Approach to Textual AnalysisBailey, Steven (2014-07-31)This study assumes the subject's pursuit of meaning is generally incapacitating and should be suspended. It aims to demonstrate how such a suspension is theoretically accomplished by utilizing Lacan's formulae of sexuation integrated with his work in discourse theory and topology. Part I places this study into context by examining scholarship from the established fields of hermeneutics, phenomenology, (post)structuralism, aesthetic theory and psychoanalysis in order to extract out their respective theory of meaning. These theories reveal that an historical struggle with meaning has been underway since the Reformation and reaches near crisis proportions in the 20th century. On the one hand this crisis is mollified by the rise of Heideggerian-Gadamerian hermeneutical phenomenology which questions traditional epistemological approaches to the text using a new ontological conceptualization of meaning and a conscious rejection of methodology. On the other hand this crisis is exacerbated when the ubiquitous nature of meaning is itself challenged by (post)structuralism's discovery of the signifier which inscribes a limit to meaning, and by the domains of sense and nonsense newly opened up by aesthetic theory. These historical developments culminate in the field of psychoanalysis which most consequentially delimits a cause of meaning said to be closely linked to the core of subjectivity. Part II extends these findings by rigorously constructing out of the Lacanian sexuated formulae a decidedly non-hermeneutical phenomenological approach useful in demonstrating the sexual nature of meaning. Explicated in their static state by way of an account of their original derivation from the Aristotelian logical square, it is argued that these four formulae are relevant to basic concerns of textual theory inclusive of the hermeneutical circle of meaning. These formulae are then set into motion by integrating them with Lacan's four discourses to demonstrate the breakdown of meaning. Finally, the cuts and sutures of two-dimensional space that is topology as set down in L'étourdit are performed to confirm how the very field of meaning is ultimately suspended from a nonsensical singular point known in Lacanian psychoanalysis as objet a. The contention is that by occupying this point the subject frees himself from the debilitating grip of meaning.
-
El acceso racional a Dios en la Institución de la Religión Cristiana de Juan Calvino Rational access to God in John Calvin’s «Institutes of the Christian Religion»Manfres Svensson (Pontificio Seminario Mayor San Rafael Valparaíso, 2012-09-01)El presente artículo analiza los primeros cinco capítulos de Institución de la Religión Cristiana, discutiendo algunas de las principales interpretaciones que se ha ofrecido de la doctrina del sensus divinitatis ahí presentada por Calvino, y preguntando por su general pertenencia a una tradición de fe en búsqueda de comprensión.<br>The present article presents an analysis of the first five chapters of John Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion, and discusses some of the main interpretations that have been advanced concerning the doctrine of the sensus divinitatis that Calvin espouses in this work.
-
El acceso racional a Dios en la Institución de la Religión Cristiana de Juan Calvino Rational access to God in John Calvin&#8217;s «Institutes of the Christian Religion»Manfres Svensson (Pontificio Seminario Mayor San Rafael Valparaíso, 2012-09-01)El presente artículo analiza los primeros cinco capítulos de Institución de la Religión Cristiana, discutiendo algunas de las principales interpretaciones que se ha ofrecido de la doctrina del sensus divinitatis ahí presentada por Calvino, y preguntando por su general pertenencia a una tradición de fe en búsqueda de comprensión.<br>The present article presents an analysis of the first five chapters of John Calvin&#8217;s Institutes of the Christian Religion, and discusses some of the main interpretations that have been advanced concerning the doctrine of the sensus divinitatis that Calvin espouses in this work.