The Limits of Pro Se Assistance in Immigration Proceedings: Discussion of NWIRP v. Sessions
Keywords
Pro Se RepresentationImmigration Law
Legal Orientation Program
Immigration Court Helpdesk
EOIR
Executive Office of Immigration Review
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project
NWIRP
Notice of Appearance
Legal Practice
Legal Profession
Civil Procedure
Immigration Law
Jurisprudence
Law
Law and Society
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Legal History
Legal Profession
Legal Writing and Research
Legislation
Litigation
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
http://ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/dlr/vol122/iss3/4http://ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&context=dlr
Abstract
This Article discusses issues regarding assistance of pro se litigants in the context of immigration law. In particular, Part II of this Article highlights programs such as the Legal Orientation Program (LOP) and Immigration Court Helpdesk (ICH) that attempt to alleviate some of the inherent difficulties non-citizen detainees face in immigration proceedings. Part III of this Article focuses on a 2008 Regulation by the Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR), which calls for discipline against attorneys that engage in a pattern or practice of failing to enter a Notice of Appearance when engaged in practice or preparation. Lastly, Part IV of this Article discusses a recent case brought by the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project (NWIRP) against the EOIR, the potential impact of this case on similar programs offering assistance to pro se immigrants, and recent developments in the litigation.Date
2018-04-01Type
textIdentifier
oai:ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu:dlr-1042http://ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/dlr/vol122/iss3/4
http://ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&context=dlr
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The Wage Effects of Immigration and EmigrationDocquier, Frederic; Peri, Giovanni; Ozden, Caglar (2012-03-19)Immigrants in Rome or Paris are more
 visible to the public eye than the Italian or French
 engineers in Silicon Valley, especially when it comes to the
 debate on the effects of immigration on the employment and
 wages of natives in high-income countries. This paper argues
 that such public fears, especially in European countries are
 misplaced; instead, more concern should be directed towards
 emigration. Using a new dataset on migration flows by
 education levels for the period 1990-2000, the results show
 the following: First, immigration had zero to small positive
 long-run effect on the average wages of natives, ranging
 from zero in Italy to +1.7 percent in Australia. Second,
 emigration had a mild to significant negative long-run
 effect ranging from zero for the US to -0.8 percent in the
 UK. Third, over the period 1990-2000, immigration generally
 improved the income distribution of European countries while
 emigration worsened it by increasing the wage gap between
 the high and low skilled natives. These patterns hold true
 using a range of parameters for the simulations, accounting
 for the estimates of undocumented immigrants, and correcting
 for the quality of schooling and/or labor-market downgrading
 of skills. All results go counter to the popular beliefs
 about migration, but they are due to the higher skill
 intensity of both emigration and immigration relative to non-migrants.
-
Breaking the Bank: Revisiting Central Bank of Denver after Enron and Sarbanes-OxleyTaylor, Celia (bepress Legal Repository, 2005-09-01)
-
A Complete Property Right AmendmentRyskamp, John H (bepress Legal Repository, 2006-10-19)The trend of the eminent domain reform and "Kelo plus" initiatives is toward a comprehensive Constitutional property right incorporating the elements of level of review, nature of government action, and extent of compensation. This article contains a draft amendment which reflects these concerns.