Direito fundamental a um processo justo, sob o enfoque do formalismo valorativo e da flexibilização procedimental
Author(s)
Santana, Anna Paula Sousa da FonsêcaContributor(s)
Coelho Neto, UbirajaraKeywords
Direito constitucionalFunção judicial
Poder judiciário
Controle da constitucionalidade
Equidade (Direito)
Ética jurídica
Ação judicial
Direito - História
Formalismo jurídico
Constitucionalismo
Formalismo-valorativo
Flexibilização procedimental
Processo justo
Ativismo judicial
Actions and defenses
Constitutional law
Equity
Forms (Law)
Judicial power
Judicial process
Law
Legal ethics
Constitutionalism
Value formalism
Procedural flexibility
Due process
Judicial activism
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/4346Abstract
This study aims to defend value formalism, like the formalism useful to the procedure as a means of achieving a fair process. For both historical analysis is made of the jurisdiction under the focus of the power conferred on the Judge from the Roman State to the present day. Takes the postwar constitutionalism as a starting point to treat the state as insurer of the fundamental rights of the citizen and as a provider of public policies. The process no longer seen as a mere tool in the service of the right
 stuff and will be recognized as a fundamental constitutional guarantee, as applied constitutional law. To do so, we start a process permeated by formalism-excessive in search of a value formalism emptying into the necessary balance or balance between the principles of effectiveness and legal certainty. Shows the need and possibility to change the paradigm of legal positivism to the model of principles and rules, as well as the possibility of dialogue in the countries of civil law institutes the common law. Search on the judicial activism the means to achieve the necessary flexibility procedural, either by technical management of litigation, the principle of elasticity, the use of axiological and ontological gaps as well as the principle of proportionality. All analysis aims to find solutions to reach decisions fairer and according with the democratic rule of law.O presente estudo tem por objetivo defender o formalismo-valorativo, ou seja, o formalismo útil ao procedimento, como meio de se alcançar um processo justo. Para tanto é feita a análise histórica da jurisdição sob o enfoque do poder conferido ao Juiz desde o Estado Romano até os dias atuais. Toma-se o constitucionalismo do pósguerra como ponto de partida para tratar do Estado como assegurador dos direitos fundamentais do cidadão e como provedor das políticas públicas. O processo deixa
 de ser visto como mero instrumento a serviço do direito material e passa a ser reconhecido como uma garantia constitucional fundamental, como direito constitucional aplicado. Para tanto, parte-se de um processo permeado por um formalismo-excessivo em busca de um formalismo-valorativo a desaguar no
 necessário equilíbrio ou ponderação entre os princípios da efetividade e segurança jurídica. Mostra-se a necessidade e possibilidade de mudança do paradigma do positivismo jurídico para o modelo de princípios e regras, como também a possibilidade de diálogo nos países da civil law de institutos da common law. Buscase no ativismo judicial o meio de concretizar a necessária flexibilização procedimental, seja pela técnica de gerenciamento de processos judiciais, pela aplicação do princípio
 da elasticidade, do uso das lacunas axiológicas e ontológicas, bem como do princípio da proporcionalidade. Toda a análise visa buscar soluções para o alcance de decisões mais justas e consetâneas com o Estado Democrático de Direito.
Date
2017-09-26Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionIdentifier
oai:ri.ufs.br:riufs/4346https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/4346
Copyright/License
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCollections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Entre a cruz e a espada: do excessivo controle judicial da administração pública à deferência judicial redimidaCardoso, Henrique Ribeiro; Santos, Mateus Levi Fontes (Pós-Graduação em DireitoUniversidade Federal de Sergipe, 2022-02-25)The goal of the dissertation is to justify and offer parameters for judicial deference to administrative 
 action in Brazil. The method used is the hypothetical-deductive one. The problem that guides the 
 research is whether, in the light of the Brazilian legal system, judicial deference, in the north 
 american strand, can be used as a limit to the broad judicial review of the performance of brazilian 
 public administration in its current context. The hypothesis is affirmative, since a parameterized 
 judicial deference, inspired by Chevron and Auer cases, is a constitutional and legal attitude, that 
 brings better consequences to the legal system. The institutionalism of Adrian Vermeule and Cass 
 Sunstein theoretically justifies the proposed judicial deference. Art. 22 of the new Introduction 
 Legal Act to the Norms of Brazilian Law (LINDB) is the specific legal basis for judicial deference 
 in Brazil. Thus, inspired by Chevron and Auer cases, a model of judicial deference applicable to 
 Brazil is proposed. Constitutional objections to this model are unconvincing. The 
 operationalization difficulties are surmountable and equalized by the likely advantages that its 
 adoption will bring to citizens, public administration and judiciary. Finally, the adoption of the 
 proposed model of deference will not increase the risk of arbitrariness in detriment of citizens, once 
 adopted the redeemed judicial deference. According to this approach – based on the idea of 
 morality of administrative law, proposed by Sunstein and Vermeule and grounded on the doctrine 
 of Lon Fuller – judicial deference involves counterparts from the administration. These charges, 
 specifically provided for in the new LINDB, set safeguards for citizens and limit arbitrariness. Such 
 an approach suggests a change in the profile of judicial review of the public administration – from 
 substantive review of specific solution to procedural and deferential review of reasonable choice.
-
FROM THE RELIGION OF OATH TO THE SECULAR OATH: CONCLUSIONS OF A STUDY ABOUT THE EVOLUTION OF PROCESSUAL OATH IN COLOMBIA THROUGH THE NINETEENTH CENTURYBernal, Andrés Botero (., 2015-03-11)Este artigo apresenta a conclusão de um trabalho maior que traz novas luzes sobre o processo de laicização do juramento processual ao longo do século XIX colombiano. Baseado em fontes primárias (processos judiciais, normativas e causas célebres) e secundárias, analisa-se o valor do juramento como garantia de verdade no marco da finalidade cultural do processo judicial, a evolução do juramento (política e processualmente) na modernidade e a passagem paulatina do juramento religioso ao secularizado no processo judicial colombiano. Discute-se, ainda, a forte relação entre religião (tanto a culta como a popular) e o juramento processual, o que contribui para a identificação das características mais importantes da cultura jurídica do século XIX.
-
A questão das sanções da Lei da improbidade administrativa : contribuições para
 procedimento e aplicação racional.Cardoso, Henrique Ribeiro; Amorim Junior, Silvio Roberto Oliveira de (Pós-Graduação em Direito, 2017-09-26)This is a Master´s Degree Dissertation that agrees with the premise that Law
 cannot be dissociated from Moral and with the conclusion that leads to the path to rationalize
 moral values in the juridical atmosphere. In that way, constitutional jurisdiction attempts its
 objectives and legitimates itself upon social medium by using juridical argumentation´s
 methods, which must be particularly respected, in Brazil, in the sphere of the analysis of
 administrative improbity´s acts. At the same time, Constitution is not only the main juridical
 text of a given State, endowed with normative power and imperative norms, but represents,
 fundamentally, the great variety of mankind knowledge´s lines, as well as it is guided by a
 truly axiological sense. Based in that post-positivist context, this Master´s Degree Dissertation
 comments about the Administrative Improbity Law (Brazilian Federal Law nº 8.429/1992) by
 offering, initially, a general panorama of the above-mentioned law; soon after, it specifies the
 object of study with its species and penalties. Finally, this work shows study about the
 necessity to establish a procedure tending to investigate the real occurrence of an improbity
 act and, in that way, it is put forward another contribution, intending to rationalize the fixation
 of Administrative Improbity Law s sanctions, together with the application of Proportionality.