• English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • English 
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • español
    • português (Brasil)
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • русский
    • العربية
    • 中文
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Law and Ethics
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Ethics collections
  • Law and Ethics
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of the LibraryCommunitiesPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsThis CollectionPublication DateTitlesSubjectsAuthorsProfilesView

My Account

Login

The Library

AboutNew SubmissionSubmission GuideSearch GuideRepository PolicyContact

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

What Does it Mean to Have a Right?

  • CSV
  • RefMan
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • RefWorks
Author(s)
Birnbacher, Dieter
Keywords
Recht
Philosophie
Law
Philosophy
Recht
Philosophie, Theologie
Law
Philosophy, Ethics, Religion
Ethik
Kinderrechte
Fachsprache
Rechtswissenschaft
Rechte und Pflichten
ethics
children's rights
technical language
jurisprudence
rights and responsibilities
Show allShow less

Full record
Show full item record
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/99477
Online Access
https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/61998
https://doi.org/10.24357/igjr.4.4.509
Abstract
This contribution offers an introduction into the language of rights and the role rights play in ethics and law, with special reference to the rights of children. It emerges that there are a number of very different functions characteristic of 'rights talk', both in ethics and law, and that many of them offer opportunities for strengthening appeals to moral and legal principles while others involve pitfalls that should be avoided. In conclusion, two of the theoretical questions raised by rights are addressed: whether the concept of rights can be replaced without loss by the concept of obligation, and whether rights should be seen as social constructs derived from obligations, or whether it is more plausible to reverse the order of priority.
Date
2019-04-04
Type
Zeitschriftenartikel
Identifier
oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/61998
2190-6335
https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/61998
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-61998-4
https://doi.org/10.24357/igjr.4.4.509
Copyright/License
Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0
Collections
Law and Ethics
Philosophical Ethics

entitlement

 
DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
Quick Guide | Contact Us
Open Repository is a service operated by 
Atmire NV
 

Export search results

The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.