H. Cohens Ethik und ihre Rezeption in der russischen Philosophie des Rechts

Abstract

The article draws attention to one remarkable feature in the perception of
 the Hermann Cohen doctrine in Russia, namely special attention on the part
 of Russian philosophers of the twentieth century to the turn of the ethical
 theories of the founder of the Marburg school of neo-Kantianism.
 In Russia, the most representative approach to the analysis of Cohen’s
 ethical theories is one conducted from the perspective of the philosophy of
 law. Ethical theories of the Marburg philosopher were in the center of scientific
 debate of the most famous Russian theorists of law – P.I. Novgorodtsev,
 B.A. Kistyakovsky, E.V. Spektorsky.
 The appeal rights of Russian theorists to analyze ethical problems Cohen
 highlighted the relation of law and morality. The central theme of the
 arguments in this respect was the theme of ethics orientation of the Marburg
 philosopher on jurisprudence. Of particular importance in view of the historicist and positivist tendencies
 that prevailed at the end of the 19th century in legal science in Russia,
 was rehabilitation of Cohen’s and his followers’ the concept of “natural law”.
 The main drawback of the criticism coming from Russian theorists of law
 in relation to Cohen is that their approach to the ideas of this great German
 thinker is not systematic enough, attempting to consider their ethical views
 independently from other parts of their philosophical constructions.

Vladimir Belov – profesor nauk filozoficznych na Saratowskim Uniwersytecie
 Państwowym im. N. G. Czernyszewskiego

Saratowski Uniwersytet Państwowy im. N. G. Czernyszewskiego

Savalsky V.A. Grundlagen der Philosophie des Rechts im wissenschaftlichen Idealismus.
 Marburg Schule der Philosophie. Cohen, Natorp, Stammler et al. T. 1 // Wissenschaftliche
 Notizen von der Kaiserlichen Universität Moskau, Jurid. Fakultät,
 Ausg. 33, M., 1909. 361 p. [Savalskij V.A. Osnovi filosofii prava v naučnom idealizme.
 Marburgskaja shkola filosofii. Kogen, Natorp, Shtammler i dr. T. 1 // Učenii
 zapiski Moskovskogo Imperatorskogo universiteta, jurid. f-ta, vip. 33].

Spektorsky E. Aus dem Reich der reinen Ethik // Probleme der Philosophie und Psychologie.
 1905. № 78. S. 384–412. [Spektorskij E. Iz oblasti čistoj etiki // Voprosi filosofii i psihologii].

Nowgoroder P.I. Russischer Anhänger von H. Cohen // Probleme der Philosophie und
 Psychologie. 1909. № 99. S. 636. [Novgorodzev P.I. Russkij posledovatel G. Kogena
 // Voprosi filosofii i psihologii].

Savalsky V. Antwort auf Professor Novgorodtsev // Probleme der Philosophie und Psychologie. № 105. 1910. S. 361. [Savalskij V. Otvet prof. Novgorodzevu // Voprosi
 filosofii i psihologii].

N.A. Dmitrieva “Russischer Neukantianismus: Marburgin Russland. Historische und philosophische Essays” M., 2007, S. 213. [Dmitrieva N.A. “Russkoje neokantianstvo:
 Marburg v Rossii. Istoriko-filosofskije očerki].

Kistyakovsky B.A. Sozialwissenschaften und Recht // Kistyakovsky B.A. Philosophie und
 Soziologie des Rechts. St. Petersburg., 1998, S. 233. [Kistjakovskij B.A. Sozialnie
 nauki i pravo // Kistjakovskij B.A. Filosofija i soziologija prava].

E.A. Frolova Neukantianische Philosophie des Rechts in Russland in den späten XIX –
 Anfang XX. M. 2013 S. 194–195. [Frolova E.A. Neokantianskaja filosofija prava
 v Rossii v konze XIX – načale XX].

373-381