China's Anti-Corruption Crackdown and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
Author(s)
Chow, Daniel C.K.Keywords
Advertising and Promotion ManagementAntitrust and Trade Regulation
Business and Corporate Communications
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics
Business Organizations Law
Common Law
Communications Law
Comparative and Foreign Law
Conflict of Laws
Contracts
Government Contracts
International Law
International Trade Law
Law
Law and Politics
Law and Society
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Litigation
Organizational Behavior and Theory
Organizations Law
Other Law
Rule of Law
Securities Law
Transnational Law
Full record
Show full item recordOnline Access
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/lawreview/vol5/iss2/4https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1141&context=lawreview
Abstract
China’s highly publicized crackdown on corruption may affect the type and number of cases in China that arise under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), but it should not be assumed that the crackdown will necessarily lead to fewer FCPA prosecutions. Although there is some overlap of the goals of China’s corruption crackdown and the goals of the FCPA, China’s crackdown also serves important goals of the ruling Communist Party. The main goal of the current crackdown is to reinforce the Party’s power by targeting enemies and rivals of the current leadership. The crackdown is not aimed at prohibiting bribes given to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining business; however, the FCPA is aimed at proscribing these types of bribes. As a result, while the crackdown may deter some types of FCPA cases from arising in China, other types of cases will be unaffected or may even increase.Date
2018-05-01Type
textIdentifier
oai:scholarship.law.tamu.edu:lawreview-1141https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/lawreview/vol5/iss2/4
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1141&context=lawreview