Bertini, Daniele2022-12-142022-12-142021-1110.51917/dialogo.2021.8.1.17http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/4260429Intractable disagreements are commonly analyzed in terms of the semantic opposition of (at least) couples of disputed beliefs (purely epistemic view, from here on PEV). While such a view seems to be a very natural starting point, my intuitions are that such an approach is misleadingly unrealistic, and that an empirical modeling towards how individuals hold beliefs in intractable opposition constitutes a strong defeater for PEV. My work addresses disagreements within the religious domain. Accordingly, I will be concerned with developing my empirical understanding of religious beliefs, and will show the consequences of such proposal on how to answer the problem of religious diversity.eng2021 RCDST. All rights reserved.religious diversityepistemology of religious beliefsepistemology of disagreementsReligious ethicsArticle2393-1744