Sukron, Mokhamad2019-09-252019-09-252016-04-052015-03http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/236595There are three important points that will be elucidated in this article: first what method uses MTA in conceiving hadith in relation with falsehood, second how MTA perspective of heresy (bid’ah), and third is re-construction the hadith of heresy (bid‘ah) according to MTA. MTA explains that what is called heresy (bid‘ah) in prophet’s hadith is bid‘ah in the matter of religion (worship) that certainly misleading. Yet, the falsehood in relation with worldly matter for MTA must be given a space to branch out as long as it gives positive impact and push people creativity in general meaning. It is suitable with prophet’s hadith said that “man sanna sunnah hasanah..... man sanna sunnah sayyiah...”. In this condition, MTA indirectly admits the variant of the bid‘ah. But the ordinary classification differs with the ulama’s classification either in terms of mutaqadimîn or muta’akhirîn, in general point of view, otherwise the classification is in contrary with the religious matters and worldly matters.indWith permission of the license/copyright holderMTAmethodhadithbid‘ahReligious ethicsSpirituality and ethicsMethods of ethicsTheological ethicsPhilosophical ethicsJournal volume